site. Proteases used as the ligation catalyst tolerate a
higher structural diversity at this position, although the
substrate specificity of these enzymes primarily narrows
the scope of these enzymes for synthesis.4 Substantial
improvements have been attained by the development
of substrate mimetics used as donor components that
eliminate the specificity problem.5 Nonspecificity toward
the peptide sequence of substrate mimetics is reached
by attaching a site-specific ester leaving group at the
C-terminus of the originally nonspecific peptide moiety.
This concept achieves protease-mediated peptide coupling
at nonspecific and even artificial ligation sites, regardless
of the specificity of the enzyme.6 Moreover, as nonspecific
sequences are coupled, the newly formed peptide bond
is stable against secondary cleavage. On the other hand,
the risk of undesired cleavages of sensitive peptide bonds
by the protease remains a serious limitation of this
approach.7
Su bstr a te Mim etics-Sp ecific P ep tid e
Liga ses: Stu d ies on th e Syn th etic Utility of
a Zym ogen a n d Zym ogen -Lik e En zym es
Kathrin Rall‡ and Frank Bordusa*,†,‡
Research Unit “Enzymology of Protein Folding”,
Max-Planck-Society, Weinbergweg 22,
D-06120 Halle/ Saale, Germany, and
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
bordusa@enzyme-halle.mpg.de
Received J une 28, 2002
Abstr a ct: Although proteases are capable of synthesizing
peptide bonds, they are not proficient at peptide fragment
ligation. Further manipulations are needed to shift the
native enzyme activity from the cleavage to the synthesis
of peptides. This account reports on the synthetic potential
of nonactivatable trypsinogen and zymogen-like enzymes
designed to minimize proteolytic side reactions during
peptide synthesis.
This paper reports on the synthetic utility of a nonac-
tivatable zymogen, i.e., mutant trypsinogen K15A, for the
substrate mimetics-mediated coupling of specific amino
acid-containing peptides. The study has been expanded
to a zymogen-like enzyme species (mutant trypsin D194N)
with a partly destabilized activation domain. Further
optimization of the biocatalyst yielded the mutant tryp-
sins D189S,D194N and K60E,D189S,D194N.
Chemical synthesis is the most powerful method for
assembling selectively modified proteins, providing a
freedom for protein engineering inaccessible by standard
site-directed mutagenesis. Presently, there are several
feasible strategies of chemical protein synthesis, each
with its own individual advantages and disadvantages.
Step-by-step solid-phase synthesis, although reaching a
high degree of sophistication, is restricted by the cumula-
tive effects of synthetic inefficiencies. This inevitably
results in the accumulation of low-level resin-bound by-
products that usually limits step-by-step synthesis to the
preparation of peptides of about 50 amino acids.1 Con-
vergent synthetic approaches, which apply protected pep-
tide fragments as reactants, allow for several proteins
to be assembled, but they have been mainly handicapped
by the insolubility of larger protected peptides in solvents
required for purification or subsequent ligation.2 To solve
this problem, several chemoselective ligation strategies
have been developed enabling unprotected peptides to be
coupled. Presently, “native chemical ligation” is the most
successful and most commonly used synthetic ligation
approach.3 Because of a mechanism that is based on the
reaction of a peptide thioester with an acceptor peptide
bearing an N-terminal Cys, this strategy, however, is
highly limited in the choice of residues at the ligation
Originally, zymogens were known as catalytically
inactive precursors of active enzymes. Activation of the
precursor enzyme to the active species is usually a result
of limited proteolytic cleavage. In the case of trypsinogen/
trypsin conversion, the peptide bond between Lys15 and
Ile16 of the zymogen becomes specifically cleaved either
by enterokinase or autocatalytically by trypsin itself.
Thus, the exchange of Lys15 with Ala protects trypsino-
gen against activation. Most zymogens have practically
no or only negligible proteolytic activity. In contrast,
activity vis-a`-vis ester bonds, although reduced signifi-
cantly, could be detected.8 Decrease in the zymogen’s
esterase activity was found to be mainly the result of
(4) (a) Schellenberger, V.; J akubke, H.-D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1991, 30, 1437-1449. (b) Wong, C.-H. Science 1989, 244, 1145-
1152. (c) J ackson, D. Y.; Burnier, J .; Quan, C.; Stanley, M.; Tom, J .;
Wells, J . A. Science 1994, 266, 243-247.
(5) (a) Mitin, Y. V.; Schellenberger, V.; Schellenberger, U.; J akubke,
H.-D.; Zapevalova, N. P. In Peptides; Giralt, E.; Andreu, D., Eds.;
ESCOM: Leiden, 1990, 287-288. (b) Sekizaki, H.; Itoh, K.; Toyota,
E.; Tanizawa, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996, 44, 1577-1579. (c)
Bordusa, F.; Ullmann, D.; Elsner, C.; J akubke, H.-D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2473-2475. (d) Thormann, M.; Thust, S.;
Hofmann, H.-J .; Bordusa, F. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 6056-6062.
(6) (a) Sekizaki, H.; Itoh, K.; Toyota, E.; Tanizawa, K. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1998, 46, 846-849. (b) Wehofsky, N.; Bordusa, F. FEBS Lett.
1999, 443, 220-224. (c) Gu¨nther, R.; Stein, A.; Bordusa, F. J . Org.
Chem. In press. (d) Gu¨nther, R.; Bordusa, F. Chem. Eur. J . 2000, 6,
463-467. (e) Gu¨nther, R.; Thust, S.; Hofmann, H.-J .; Bordusa, F. Eur.
J . Biochem. 2000, 267, 3496-3501. (f) Gu¨nther, R.; Stein, A.; Bordusa,
F. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1672-1679.
(7) (a) Wehofsky, N.; Kirbach, S. W.; Haensler, M.; Wissmann, J .-
D.; Bordusa, F. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2027-2030. (b) Xu, S.; Rall, K.;
Bordusa, F. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1627-1632. (c) Gru¨nberg, R.;
Domgall, I.; Gu¨nther, R.; Rall, K.; Hofmann, H.-J .; Bordusa, F. Eur.
J . Biochem. 2000, 267, 7024-7230.
(8) (a) Gertler, A.; Walsh, K. A.; Neurath, H. Biochemistry, 1973,
13, 1302-1307. (b) Ullmann, D.; Salchert, K.; Bordusa, F.; Schaaf, R.;
J akubke, H.-D. In Proceedings of the 5th Akabori Conference; Wu¨nsch,
E., Ed.; R. & J . Blank: Munich, 1994; pp 70-75.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 345
5522806. Fax: +49 345 5511972.
† Max-Planck-Society.
‡ University of Leipzig.
(1) (a) Bodansky, M.; Bodansky, A. The Practice of Peptide Synthesis;
Springer-Verlag: New York, 1984. (b) Kaiser, E. T. Acc. Chem. Res.
1989, 22, 957.
(2) see review: Borgia, J . A.; Fields, G. B. TIBTECH. 2000, 18, 243-
251.
(3) (a) Kemp, D. S.; Grattan, J . A.; Reczek, J . J . Org. Chem. 1975,
40, 3465-3466. (b) Fotouhi, N.; Galakatos, N. G.; Kemp, D. S. J . Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 2803-2809. (c) Schnalzer, M.; Kent, S. B. H. Science
1992, 256, 221-225. (d) Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. M.; Clark-Lewis, I.;
Kent, S. B. H. Science 1994, 266, 776-779. (e) Tam, J . P.; Liu, C.-F.;
Shao, J . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 12485-12489.
10.1021/jo026117i CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/20/2002
J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9103-9106
9103