Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Article
The steady-state fluorescence measurements were per-
formed keeping the excitation wavelength for 1 at 350 nm
with and excitation and emission band pass of 10 nm. Fixed
concentration of 1 (20 μM) was titrated over the incremental
concentration range of DNA (0−34 μM).
Estimation of the Binding Parameters. The binding
affinity of 1 to DNA was estimated from absorbance and
fluorescence titration data using modified Benesi−Hildebrand
(BH) eq 142
Table 2. Crystal Data and Structure Refinement for 1
parameters
formula
1
C12H15ClMnN8O4
formula Weight
crystal System
space group
425.71
monoclinic
P21/c (no. 14)
a, b, c [Å]
13.1596(6), 15.2760(8), 8.7403(5)
α, β, γ [deg]
V [Å3]
90, 108.474(2), 90
1666.48(15)
1
ΔA
1
1
1
[M]
Z
4
=
+
×
D (calc) [g/cm3]
μ (Mo Kα) [mm]
F(000)
1.697
0.992
868
ΔAmax
(ΔAmax)KBH
(1)
Here, the difference in absorbance or fluorescence is denoted
by ΔA, and [M] is the concentration of DNA. By plotting the
reciprocal of the difference in absorbance/fluorescence
intensity against the reciprocal of DNA concentration, the
BH plot was constructed. The association constant (KBH) for
1−DNA complexation was calculated from the ratio of the
intercept to the slope.21,22,30
Continuous Variation Analysis (Job’s Plot). Stoichiom-
etry for the complexation of compound 1 with DNA was
determined by the continuous variation method (Job’s plot).43
The fluorescence signal was recorded for solutions where the
concentrations of both DNA and 1 were varied, while the sum
of their concentrations was kept fixed. The plot of difference in
fluorescence intensity (ΔF) of the compound at 430 nm was
plotted as a function of the input mole fraction of 1. Inflection
point in the resulting plot corresponds to the mole fraction of
the bound 1 in the DNA-1 complex. The stoichiometry was
obtained in terms of DNA-1[(1 − χcompound)/χcompound], where,
χ denotes the mole fraction of compound 1. The results
presented are average of three experiments.21
Determination of the Binding Mechanism by the
Hoechst 33258 Displacement Assay. The competitive
binding efficiency between Hoechst 33258 and 1 with DNA
was determined by fluorimetry in the range of 400−600 nm.44
Aliquots of stock solution of 1 (upto 0−32 μM) were added to
the equilibrated mixture of CT−DNA (20 μM) and Hoechst
33258 (1.91 μM) (termed as the Hoechst−DNA complex) at
room temperature. The excitation wavelength was set as 350
nm.
Circular Dichroism Spectral Study. Circular dichroism
(CD) spectra were performed on a JASCO J815 model unit
(JASCO International Co. Ltd. Japan) equipped with a JASCO
temperature controller (PFD 425L/15) at 298.15 0.5 K in
the region 200−400 nm by following the literature
methods.29,30 A rectangular stainless quartz cuvette of 1 cm
path length was used. Titrations were performed by the
addition of incremental concentrations of 1 to a fixed
concentration of DNA (60 μM). The molar ellipticity values
[θ] were calculated from the equation [θ] = 100 × θ/(C × l),
where C is the concentration in moles/lit, and l is the cell path
length of the cuvette in cm. The molar ellipticity [θ] (deg cm2/
dmol) values are expressed in terms of base pairs.43
crystal Size [mm]
temperature (K)
radiation [λ, Å]
θmin−max [deg]
data set
tot., uniq. data, R(int)
observed data [I > 2σ(I)]
Nref, Npar
0.18 × 0.29 × 0.35
100
0.71073
2.7, 33.2
−19: 19; −23: 23; −13: 13
27324, 6324, 0.045
5020
6324, 260
R, wR2, S
0.0417, 0.1011, 1.05
associated with the conductor-like polarizable continuum
model (CPCM).36 Becke’s hybrid function37 with the Lee−
Yang−Parr (LYP) correlation function38 was used throughout
the study. The absorbance spectral properties in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) medium was calculated by time-dependent
DFT (TDDFT)39 associated with the CPCM. We computed
the lowest 40 sextet−sextet transitions (as ligand environments
of Mn(II) is in weak field strength, so the metal center is in
high spin state with spin multiplicity 6 having the d5 system).
We employed 6-31+G** for C, H, N, O, Cl, and for Mn
atoms, and we used LanL2DZ as the basis set for all the
calculations. All the calculations were performed with the
Gaussian 09W software package.40 Gauss Sum 2.1 program41
was used to calculate the molecular orbital contributions from
groups or atoms.
DNA Binding Measurements. DNA binding measure-
ments were carried out following similar protocols elaborated
previously.21,22,29,30 The DNA sample exhibited a characteristic
ultraviolet absorption spectrum with an A260/A280 ratio
between 1.88 and 1.92 and an A260/A230 ratio between 2.12
and 2.22. The DNA concentration in base pairs was estimated
by recording absorbance at 260 nm employing a molar
absorption coefficient (ε) value of 13,200 M−1 cm−1. All
experiments were performed in filtered 10 mM citrate−
phosphate (CP) buffer, pH 7.0, prepared in triple-distilled
water. Biophysical experiments were carried out in 2% DMSO-
buffer (v/v) solution of the complex (1). The kinetic study of
the decomposition of the complex in the 2% DMSO buffer (v/
v) solution for 2.7 h was carried out to ascertain the stability of
the complex 1 in the testing media.
Hydrodynamic Studies. Hydrodynamic studies were
carried out to characterize the binding mode of the complex
with DNA. The details of hydrodynamic studies are described
Absorbance and Fluorescence Spectral Titrations.
The absorption and fluorescence spectral titrations were
performed at 298.15
0.5 K using quartz cuvettes of path
length 1 cm, following the methods standardized in our
laboratory and reported earlier.21,22,29,30 The electronic spectra
of 1 were monitored as a function of the concentration of
DNA. In each case, a fixed concentration of 1 (20 μM) was
titrated with increasing concentration of DNA (0−30 μM).
ITC Study. ITC studies were executed on a VP-ITC
microcalorimeter to derive the binding and thermodynamic
parameters of 1-DNA association. During the titration, aliquots
of 1 (128 μM) were injected from the rotating syringe into the
isothermal chamber containing 60 μM, 1.4235 mL of DNA
C
J. Chem. Eng. Data XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX