yield, which was deduced to be 11 by spectroscopic
analysis.16 Deketalization of 11 in THF followed by autoxi-
Scheme 4. Reductive Rearrangement Pathway for 5 f 14
t
dative dehydrogenation17 (KOtBu, BuOH, O2, P(OEt)3,
40 °C) of the resulting crude hydroxy ketone 12 (epi-
desmethylcephalotaxine) afforded desmethylcephalotaxinone
(13) (mp 105-107 °C) in 86% yield,6b identical in every
respect with a sample prepared from natural (-)-CET18 by
hydrolysis7 and autoxidative dehydrogenation as for 11 f
13. Since the conversion of desmethylcephalotaxinone (13)
to natural (-)-CET via methylation, optical resolution with
L-tartaric acid,19 and borohydride reduction has been
demonstrated,1b the sequence outlined in Scheme 1 consti-
tutes a total synthesis of CET with an overall yield of ca.
12% to desmethylcephalotaxinone (3) from diester 7 through
an eight-stage sequence.
The synthesis described above evolved from an initial
strategic plan (Figure 1, path b) that was based on an
intramolecular Mannich cyclization20 of the iminium inter-
mediate 4 for the E-ring formation. We envisioned that the
corresponding precursor to 4 would be generated from cyclic
ketone 5 by a Clemmensen reductive rearrangement. The
anomalous Clemmensen reduction of cyclic R-amino ketone
was first noticed by Clemo in 1931,21 clarified by Prelog,22
and later studied systematically by Leonard and co-workers.23
Surprisingly, the potential of this interesting reductive
rearrangement in organic synthesis has not been recognized.
We took advantage of this unique Clemmensen-Clemo-
Prelog-Leonard reductive rearrangement for constructing the
benzazepine-bearing ABCD-ring system of CET. To our
delight, standard Clemmensen reduction (Zn-Hg, concen-
trated HCl, reflux) of R-amino ketone 5 led to allyl
benzazepine derivative 14 in 76% isolated yield (Scheme
3). Furthermore, we found that anhydrous Clemmensen
This facile rearrangement can be generalized (Scheme 4)
as an acid-catalyzed transannular interaction26 of N:fCdOH+
(leading to a transient aziridinium intermediate), which would
facilitate the benzylic C-N bond reductive cleavage.27 The
electron-rich aromatic system certainly contributed to this
facile process.
Acidic Wacker oxidation (vide supra) of 14 gave methyl
ketone 15 in 74% yield. However, the attempted generation
of iminium intermediate 4 from 15 by the oxidative action28
of Hg(OAc)2 resulted in a slow decomposition of 15 under
a variety of reaction conditions. In case an alternative
Polonovski-Potier protocol29 might be more selective, the
corresponding amine oxide of 15 prepared by m-CPBA
oxidation was treated with excess trifluoroacetic anhydride
(TFAA) in CH2Cl2, and enamine ketone 16 was obtained as
the sole product in 70% yield, which was apparently formed
by isomerization of the initially generated iminium salt 4.
Compound 16 had been previously synthesized6 by an
alternative enamine alkylation of the so-called Dolby-
Weinreb enamine,1b and it had been claimed6 by Weinreb
and Weinstein that cyclization to 2 (formally an endocyclic
enamine annulation) could not be realized under various
conditions, although Dolby et al. reported that acid-catalyzed
Scheme 3. Enamine Cyclopentenone Annulation Pathway to 2
(18) We thank Professor Xiao-Tian Liang of Beijing Institute of Materia
Medica for a gift of natural cephalotaxine.
(19) Cf. ref 1b, pp 219-220. See also: Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 56276.
(20) For an excellent review, see: Overman, L. E.; Ricca, D. J. In
ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon
Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, pp 1007-1046.
(21) (a) Clemo, G. R.; Ramage, G. R. J. Chem. Soc. 1931, 437. (b)
Clemo, G. R.; Raper, R.; Vipond, H. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 2095.
(22) Prelog, V.; Seiwerth, R. Chem. Ber. 1939, 72, 1638.
(23) (a) Leonard, N. J.; Wildman, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71,
3089. (b) Leonard, N. J.; Ruyle, W. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 3094.
(c) Leonard, N. J.; Barthel, E.; Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 3098. (d)
Leonard, N. J.; Curry, J. W.; Sagura, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75,
6249 and previous articles in this series. (e) Wilson, W. Chem. Ind. (London)
1955, 200. (f) Brewster, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 6364.
(24) Vedejs, E. Org. React. 1975, 22, 401.
(25) Studies along this line toward natural product synthesis are in
progress and will be reported in due course.
reduction conditions,24 with zinc dust in hot glacial acetic
acid, were also equally effective for this reductive rearrange-
ment. This convenient and mild procedure is well suited to
multifunctional substrates.25
(26) For a review, see: Leonard, N. J. Rec. Chem. Prog. 1956, 17, 243.
(27) Cf.: (a) Gaskell, A. J.; Joule, J. A. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 5115. In
contrast, see: (b) Noe´, E.; Se´raphin, D.; Zhang, Q.; Djate´, F.; He´nin, J.;
Laronze, J.-Y.; Le´vy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 5701. (c) A¨ıt-Mohand,
S.; Noe´, E.; He´nin, J.; Laronze, J.-Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3429.
(28) For leading references, see: (a) Leonard, N. J.; Hay, A. S.; Fulmer,
R. W.; Gash, V. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 439. (b) Leonard, N. J.;
Fulmer, R. W.; Hay, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 3457.
(29) For a review, see: Grierson, D. S.; Husson, H.-P. In ComprehensiVe
Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford,
1991; Vol. 6, pp 910-947.
(16) Cf.: (a) Yasuda, S.; Yamada, T.; Hanaoka, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 2023. (b) Yasuda, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Hanaoka, M.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 4229.
(17) For example, see: Woodward, R. B. (work with Volpp, G.;
Gougoutas, J. Z.) The HarVey Lectures 1963, 31.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 16, 2003
2933