Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
4
K. Hirakawa, S. Morimoto / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 318 (2016) 1–6
one-electron reduction of MP(V)TPP (ꢀ0.50 V vs. SCE) [23],
equation:
respectively, and ES is theS1energy of MP(V)TPP (2.05 eV, estimat-
1
1
tf
1
tf0
¼
þ kET½FAꢁ
ð3Þ
ed from the fluorescence maximum: 606 nm). The estimated value
(ꢀ
theS1of MP(V)TPP is possible in the terms of thermodynamics.
G value of the electron transfer from folic acid to
DG = 0.71 eV) supported that electron transfer from folic acid to
where, t0f is the tf without folic acid and [FA] is the concentration of
The ꢀD
folic acid. The resulting value of kET (4.2 ꢂ109 Mꢀ1 sꢀ1) was
comparable with the value of diffusion control limit (kdif = 7.4
ꢂ 109 Mꢀ1 sꢀ1; Supplementary information). Consequently, the
quantum yield of the electron transfer process (FET) can be
expressed as follows:
theT1state of MP(V)TPP can be estimated from the similar equation
of Eq. (2), of which theES is replaced with theT1 energy (ET ). Since
1
1
theET of similar porphyrin is around 1.5 eV [31,32], the roughly
1
estimated value of ꢀ
DG is 0.2 eV, suggesting that the electron
transfer-mediated oxidation of folic acid by the T1state of MP(V)
TPP is exothermic reaction. However, in this experimental
condition, the photosensitized folic acid decomposition by the
T1state of MP(V)TPP could not be demonstrated. The driving force
of around 0.2 eV might be insufficient (described in Section 3.3).
The MP(V)TPP radical, formed through the electron transfer
from folic acid, should be returned to the original cationic form of
MP(V)TPP possibly by molecular oxygen under aerobic condition.
In the biological system, other oxidative materials such as metal
ions may assist the re-oxidation of this MP(V)TPP radical. The
photoreaction of MP(V)TPP should proceed catalytically.
kET½FAꢁ
FET
¼
ð4Þ
1
þ kET½FAꢁ
tf0
In this experimental condition ([FA] = 10
m
M), the value of FET
is 2.2 ꢂ10ꢀ4. The formed charge-transfer (CT) state undergoes
further reaction, leading to the decomposition of folic acid [13–18].
Alternatively, some part of the CT state can return to the ground
state through reverse-electron transfer. The reaction quantum
yield of the CT state to the decomposed product (Fr) can be
calculated using the following equation:
The sample solution containing 5 mM MP(V)TPP with or
FD
FET
Fr
¼
ð5Þ
without folic acid in a 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6)
were prepared to measure the time profile of fluorescence
intensity. The time profile of MP(V)TPP fluorescence intensity
could be analyzed by a single exponential function (Supplementary
information). The obtained fluorescence lifetime (tf) was 5.2 ns in a
10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). The electron transfer
should occur within this lifetime. To evaluate the electron transfer
rate constant, the tf with folic acid was measured. A significant
change of tf was not observed in the presence of relatively small
The calculated value of Fr (0.50) suggests that the efficiency of
the reverse-electron transfer (FRET = 0.50) is relatively large.
3.3. Protocol to evaluate the activity of photosensitizer using folic acid
This photosensitized reaction of folic acid decomposition and
resulting fluorescence enhancement can be applied to the
evaluation of the biomolecule damaging-activity of photosensi-
tizers. Because the PDT reaction occurs in the complex biological
system, this method may be used for a first screening process of
PDT drug. In general, the mechanisms of photosensitized
biomolecule damage can be explained by two processes, electron
transfer (Type I) and 1O2 generation (Type II) [33]. It has been
reported that 1O2 cannot decompose folic acid in aqueous solution,
whereas it is possible in D2O [29]. This study also demonstrated
that a 1O2 quencher does not inhibit the photosensitized folic acid
decomposition by MP(V)TPP. Therefore, the electron transfer-
mediated biomolecule damaging-activity of photosensitizers can
be simply evaluated by a fluorometry using folic acid in aqueous
solution.
concentration (around 10 mM) of folic acid, which is a similar
condition of the photosensitized reaction (Supplementary infor-
mation). Thus, the values of tf with relatively higher concentration
of folic acid were measured (Supplementary information). The
time profiles of fluorescence decay of MP(V)TPP with high
concentration of folic acid could be also fitted by single exponential
function. The analyzed values of tf were slightly and gradually
decreased depending on the concentration of folic acid. To obtain
the electron transfer rate coefficient (kET), these values were
analyzed by the Stern–Volmer plot (Fig. 6) using the following
For this fluorometry, a sample solution containing 10–20 mM
folic acid and photosensitizers are mixed in aqueous solution.
Because folic acid solution exhibits optimum stability at pH 7.6, the
pH range 6.0–8.0 is recommend. For example, sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.6) is appropriate. The concentration of the photo-
sensitizers should be adjusted to the appropriate absorbance of the
fluorescence apparatus used for this assay. A visible-light-emitting
diode (LED) is recommended as the light source. The sensitivity of
this analysis is proportional to the irradiation time, and several
minutes (10–30 min) may be sufficient for a general photosensi-
tizer. The biomolecules damaging-activity of photosensitizers can
be evaluated by the determination of the FD, which can be
estimated by Eq. (1).
Relevantly, photosensitized folic acid decomposition by other
compounds, riboflavin [15,17,34] and rhodamine-6G [22] were
reported. The folic acid decomposition by these molecules can be
explained by electron transfer mechanism. The ꢀ
riboflavin and rhodamine-6G are 0.81 eV and 0.34 eV [22],
G value of the case of riboflavin was estimated
from the reported redox potential [35] and excitation energy [36]
using the Eq. (2). In the case of rhodamine-6G, the reported value of
DG values of
respectively. The ꢀ
D
Fig. 6. Stern–Volmer plot of the fluorescence quenching of MP(V)TPP by folic acid.
The sample solution contained 5 mM MP(V)TPP and the indicated concentration of
folic acid in a 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). The excitation wavelength is
571 nm. The detection wavelength is >640 nm.