Communication
ChemComm
4-aminophenol (Fig. 4c). The reaction conditions were Conflicts of interest
optimized by changing the concentration of NaBH4 (0.05–0.2 M)
There are no conflicts to declare.
and catalyst (50–100 mL dispersion of 1 mg mLÀ1) for the reduction
of nitrophenol (0.13 mM, Table S4 and Fig. S16, ESI†). 96%
conversion occurred within 3.5 min using 50 mL of 1 mg mLÀ1
of Ag@NPOP dispersion and 0.2 M of NaBH4 (Fig. 4c and
Fig. S16, ESI†).
Notes and references
1 (a) P. Kaur, J. T. Hupp and S. T. Nguyen, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 819;
(b) N. Chaoui, M. Trunk, R. Dawson, J. Schmidt and A. Thomas,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 3302; (c) J. Wu, F. Xu, S. Li, P. Ma,
X. Zhang, Q. Liu, R. Fu and D. Wu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1802922;
(d) J. S. M. Lee and A. I. Cooper, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 2171;
(e) R. Liu, K. T. Tan, Y. Gong, Y. Chen, Z. Li, S. Xie, T. He, Z. Lu,
H. Yang and D. Jiang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 120.
2 (a) S. Kramer, N. R. Bennedsen and S. Kegnæs, ACS Catal., 2018,
8, 6961; (b) M. W. Hussain, V. Bharadwaj, A. Giri, A. Chande and
A. Patra, Chem. Sci., 2020, 11, 7910; (c) R. Tao, X. Ma, X. Wei, Y. Jin,
L. Qiu and W. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 17360; (d) X. Yang
and Q. Xu, Trends Chem., 2020, 2, 214.
3 (a) M. Yoshizawa, J. K. Klosterman and M. Fujita, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 3418; (b) T. Hasell and A. I. Cooper, Nat. Rev. Mater.,
2016, 1, 16053; (c) Q. Zhang, L. Catti and K. Tiefenbacher, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2018, 51, 2107.
4 (a) Y. Jin, B. A. Voss, A. Jin, H. Long, R. D. Noble and W. Zhang,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 6650; (b) M. W. Hussain, A. Giri and
A. Patra, Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2019, 3, 2567.
5 (a) Y. Jin, B. A. Voss, R. McCaffrey, C. T. Baggett, R. D. Noble and
W. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 874; (b) O. Buyukcakir, Y. Seo and
A. Coskun, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 4149; (c) Y. Yang, X. Zou, P. Cui,
Y. Zhou, S. Zhao, L. Wang, Y. Yuan and G. Zhu, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces, 2017, 9, 30958; (d) Q. Zhu, X. Wang, R. Clowes, P. Cui,
L. Chen, M. A. Little and A. I. Cooper, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020,
142, 16842; (e) A. Giri, A. Sahoo, T. K. Dutta and A. Patra, ACS Omega,
2020, 5, 28413.
6 (a) H. Yang, Y. Du, S. Wan, G. D. Trahan, Y. Jin and W. Zhang, Chem.
Sci., 2015, 6, 4049; (b) Y. Du, H. Yang, J. M. Whiteley, S. Wan, Y. Jin,
S. Lee and W. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1737; (c) Y. Du,
H. Yang, S. Wan, Y. Jina and W. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017,
5, 9163.
7 H. Li, B. Meng, S. H. Chai, H. Liu and S. Dai, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 905.
8 A. Giri, M. W. Hussain, B. Sk and A. Patra, Chem. Mater., 2019,
31, 8440.
9 (a) H. Kudo, R. Hayashi, K. Mitani, T. Yokozawa, N. C. Kasuga
and T. Nishikubo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7948;
(b) J. Tian, P. K. Thallapally, S. J. Dalgarno, P. B. McGrail and
J. L. Atwood, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 5492; (c) R. S. Patil,
C. Zhang, C. L. Barnes and J. L. Atwood, Cryst. Growth Des., 2017,
17, 7.
A linear correlation between ln(Ct/Co) [where Ct = the
absorbance of the reaction mixture (B408 nm) at time t and
C0 = the absorbance before the addition of the Ag@NPOP]
against time suggested pseudo-first-order kinetics (Fig. 4c,
inset).17 The rate constant for the catalytic reduction of
4-nitrophenol was estimated to be 1.60 Â 10À2 sÀ1 which was
comparable or higher than those of well-known porous
catalysts (Table S7, ESI†).18 The Ag@NPOP exhibited faster
reaction kinetics for various nitroarenes under similar reaction
conditions (Fig. 4d and Fig. S17, ESI†). The reaction at a higher
scale (1 mmol) of nitroaromatic substrates using the Ag@NPOP
as catalyst showed high conversion (B90%) within 2 h (Fig.
S38–S40, ESI†). The Ag@NPOP was isolated by centrifugation
and was reused for multiple cycles. A similar percentage of
conversion up to 15 cycles indicated excellent recyclability of
the catalyst (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, FTIR, FESEM, and HRTEM
analyses of the recovered Ag@NPOP ascertained the robustness
of the catalyst (Fig. S20–S22, ESI†). The Ag@NPOP outper-
formed the commercially available Ag nanoparticle dispersion
under identical reaction conditions, presumably due to a
homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles throughout the por-
ous NPOP matrix (Fig. 4d and Fig. S18, ESI†). Preliminary
investigations also revealed a promising catalytic performance
of the Ag@NPOP for the synthesis of propargylamine deriva-
tives through a multicomponent reaction (Fig. S23, S24 and
S41–S44, ESI†).
In summary, we demonstrated a cage-to-network design
strategy by employing a multifunctional ‘preporous’ building
unit, noria, for the development of a highly microporous
organic polymer (NPOP). Owing to 24 phenolic hydroxyl groups 10 (a) H. Kudo, T. Miyamae, K. Kitagawa, K. Isoi, N. Murayama and
J. Hayashi, ChemistrySelect, 2018, 3, 2223; (b) D. Jiang, R. Deng, G. Li,
G. Zheng and H. Guo, RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 6185.
11 L. P. Skala, A. Yang, M. J. Klemes, L. Xiao and W. R. Dichtel, J. Am.
and multiple cavities, noria turned out to be a suitable catalyst
for the conversion of CO2 and epoxides to cyclic organic
carbonates. On the other hand, the NPOP bridged the gap
between homo- and heterogeneous catalysts exhibiting
excellent metal-free catalytic efficiency with high recyclability
for CO2 fixation (Table S6, ESI†). Furthermore, in situ reduction of
silver nitrate by the NPOP led to a Ag nanoparticle encapsulated
porous network, Ag@NPOP, which showed a remarkable
Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 13315.
12 (a) M. W. Hussain, S. Bandyopadhyay and A. Patra, Chem. Commun.,
2017, 53, 10576; (b) L. Zou, Y. Sun, S. Che, X. Yang, X. Wang,
M. Bosch, Q. Wang, H. Li, M. Smith, S. Yuan, Z. Perry and
H. C. Zhou, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1700229.
13 K. Huang, J. Y. Zhang, F. Liu and S. Dai, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 9079.
14 A. P. Katsoulidis, J. He and M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 2012,
24, 1937.
catalytic activity toward nitroarene reduction (Table S7, ESI†). 15 Y. B. Huang, Q. Wang, J. Liang, X. Wang and R. Cao, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2016, 138, 10104.
16 W. Zhang, Y. Mei, X. Huang, P. Wu, H. Wu and M. He, ACS Appl.
The highly efficient catalytic performance shown in the current
study delineates exciting future avenues of noria-based porous
Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 44241.
organic materials in heterogeneous organocatalysis.
Financial support from MHRD STARS/APR2019/CS/560/FS,
SERB/CHM/2017/113 (file no. EMR/2017/000233), infrastruc-
tural support, and FIST supported TEM facility to the
Dept. of Chemistry, IISER Bhopal are gratefully acknowledged.
AG and NP thank UGC and DST-INSPIRE, respectively, for a
fellowship.
17 T. Aditya, A. Pal and T. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 9410.
´
18 (a) P. Pachfule, S. Kandambeth, D. D. Dıaz and R. Banerjee, Chem.
Commun., 2014, 50, 3169; (b) X. Shi, Y. Yao, Y. Xu, K. Liu, G. Zhu,
L. Chi and G. Lu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 7481;
(c) W. Gong, Q. Wu, G. Jiang and G. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019,
7, 13449; (d) S. Goswami, H. Noh, L. R. Redfern, K. Otake, C. Kung,
Y. Cui, K. W. Chapman, O. K. Farha and J. T. Hupp, Chem. Mater.,
2019, 31, 1485; (e) X. Yang, J. Sun, M. Kitta, H. Pang and Q. Xu, Nat.
Catal., 2018, 1, 214.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 4404–4407 | 4407