M. Ziółek et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 464 (2008) 181–186
185
ler than that of CTAB and TX ones [22,23] and the free volume for
the deactivation mechanism is more restricted, therefore the SAA
trans-keto tautomer lifetime might be longer in SDS. In alcohols
and micelles an extra transient absorption feature with a maxi-
mum between 400 and 425 nm can be also recognized as an addi-
tional component of minor amplitude and lifetime in the range of
single ls (Figs. S11 and S13). Its possible origin is the open trans-
enol structure (with respect to C–C (phenyl) bond) created after
reenolization, which then converts to the initial closed (with intra-
molecular hydrogen bond) enol tautomer.
To summarize, it has been found that three depopulation routes
are responsible for the deactivation of the ground state of the SAA
trans-keto tautomer in solution: ‘normal’ first-order process via
the ground state of cis-keto tautomer (back trans–cis isomerisation
followed by back intramolecular proton transfer), second-order
double proton transfer in the hydrogen-bonded complex of two
trans-keto tautomers and pseudo first-order solvent-assisted reeno-
lization via the intermolecular proton transfer. The last mechanism
operates very efficiently in alcohols and micellar systems. The
proposed deactivation scheme for SAA is also presented in Fig. S14.
Fig. 4. Kinetic curves of the transient absorption signals of SAA in ACN for different
concentration with the fitted function according to Eq. (1). The fitted rate constants
3
ꢁ1
9
ꢁ1 ꢁ1
are:
k
1
= 1.5 ꢀ10
s
and
k
2
= 0.7 ꢀ10
M
s . For clarity, only every 150
experimental point is shown.
4
. Conclusions
On the contrary, in alcohols the trans-keto tautomer lifetime is
significantly decreased as observed for some other Schiff bases
The photochromic cycle of SAA as well as spectroscopic and
[
7,19], there is no influence on the SAA concentration and the de-
cay is mono-exponential (time constants: 11 s in TFE, 9 s in
MeOH and 0.15 s in HFIP). This effect might be explained by the
photophysical properties of the SAA tautomers participating in this
cycle has been investigated by means of the stationary and time-
resolved UV–vis spectroscopy. The similarities and differences be-
tween the SAA dynamics in homogeneous solvents and micellar
systems are summarized in Table 3. SAA can be proposed as a con-
venient probe for studying the properties of photochromic Schiff
bases in heterogeneous environments due to a remarkable resis-
tance to hydrolysis, a considerable stabilization of the primary enol
form and a relatively simple deactivation scheme.
l
l
l
solvent assisted reenolization involving the complex with one or
more solvent molecules, like proposed for salicylidene-1-naphtyl-
amine [6]. More detailed studies of 2-(2 -hydroxyphenyl)-3-H-in-
dole [33] indicated the participation of two alcohol molecules in
the catalysis of the deactivation rate of trans-keto tautomer. By
analogy with those studies, the back proton transfer in the SAA
molecule probably takes place through the intermolecular ex-
change of the hydrogen atom from the alcohols’ hydroxyl groups,
see Fig. S14. Very short trans-keto tautomer lifetimes were also ob-
0
Acknowledgements
served for SAA in the micelles: 0.45
ls in SDS, 0.25 ls in TX and
This work was performed under financial support of the Minis-
try of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) Poland project N204
0
.20 s in CTAB (Fig. S10). This should be probably explained by
l
the water-assisted process (water has proton donating ability com-
parable to that of strong alcohols – see Table S1) and confirms that
the SAA is located in the polar part of the micelles, where the water
molecules are present. The molecular size of SDS micelles is smal-
1
49 32/3777. Dynamic measurements were made at the Center for
Ultrafast Laser Spectroscopy at the A. Mickiewicz University in
Poznan, Poland. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jerzy
Karolczak assistance with time-resolved fluorescence measure-
ments and Dr. Gotard Burdzinski assistance with nanosecond tran-
sient absorption measurements. We also thank Dr. Krzysztof
Dobek and Dr. Dariusz Komar for permission to use their fitting
program for time-resolved emission data.
Table 3
Summary of the main SAA tautomers’ properties in solution and in micellar systems
Tautomers SAA in solution
SAA in micelles
Enol
Stationary absorption band: red
shift with increasing
Stationary absorption band
similar to that in polar solvents.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
polarizability and blue shift with
increasing polarity and proticity.
cis-Keto
The shortest lifetime in polar
solvents, the lifetime increases
with increasing polarizability,
viscosity and proticity. Single-
exponential fluorescence decay
Lifetime comparable or longer
than that in highly viscous
solvents. Multi-exponential
fluorescence decay with
wavelength-dependent
References
[1] T. Rosenfeld, M. Ottolenghi, A.Y. Meyer, Mol. Photochem. 5 (1973) 39.
[2] P.F. Barbara, P.M. Rentzepis, L.E. Brus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 2786.
(except for highly viscous
amplitudes of emission.
[
[
3] K. Kownacki, Ł. Kaczmarek, A. Grabowska, Chem. Phys. Lett. 210 (1993) 373.
4] K. Kownacki, A. Mordzinski, R. Wilbrandt, A. Grabowska, Chem. Phys. Lett. 227
solvents).
trans-Keto Non-exponential decay and
concentration dependant
Very short lifetime comparable to
that in most protic alcohols (due
to the effect of water present in
micelles). Only first order
process.
(
1994) 270.
[5] R.S. Becker, C. Lenoble, A. Zein, J. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 3509.
[6] J.S. Stephan, A. Mordzi n´ ski, C. Ríos Rodríguez, K.H. Grellmann, Chem. Phys. Lett.
229 (1994) 541.
[7] A. Ohshima, A. Momotake, T. Arai, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 79 (2006) 305.
[8] S. Mitra, N. Tamai, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5 (2003) 4647.
lifetime in non-protic solvents –
mixed first and second order
processes. Lifetime increases
with increasing polarity. Proticity
of the solvents drastically
[
9] M.I. Knyazhansky, A.V. Metelitsa, M.E. Kletskii, A.A. Millov, S.O. Besugliy, J. Mol.
Struct. 526 (2000) 65.
shortens the lifetime and makes
it pure first order.
[
[
10] M. Irie, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 1683.
11] M. Sliwa et al., Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 4727.