Organic Process Research & Development 2007, 11, 1062–1064
Discovery of the Decarboxylative Blaise Reaction and Its Application to the Efficient
Synthesis of Ethyl 2,6-Dichloro-5-fluoronicotinoylacetate1
Jae Hoon Lee, Bo Seung Choi, Jay Hyok Chang, Sam Sik Kim, and Hyunik Shin*
Chemical DeVelopment DiVision, LG Life Sciences, Ltd./R&D, 104-1 Moonji-dong, Yusong-gu, Daejeon 305-380, Korea
Scheme 1
Abstract:
An efficient synthesis of 2,6-dichloro-5-fluoronicotinoylacetate (1)
has been accomplished in a single step using the unprecedented
decarboxylative Blaise reaction of 3-cyano-2,6-dichloro-5-fluoro-
pyridine (4) with potassium ethyl malonate in the presence of zinc
chloride.
A naphthyridine ring is embedded as a key structural unit
of many potent quinolone antibiotics such as enoxacin,2
tosufloxacin,3 trovafloxacin,4 and gemifloxacin (Scheme 1).5 To
construct this structural segment, most of the reported syntheses
employed as a key starting material ethyl 2,6-dichloro-5-
fluoronicotinoylacetate (1), which was prepared from a common
synthetic route, the reaction of an acetate enolate equivalent
with 2,6-dichloro-5-fluoronicotinoyl chloride (2) (Scheme 2).
The reaction of magnesium enolate of diethyl malonate with
the nicotinoyl chloride 2 proceeded well to give the diester
intermediate 3 (R ) OEt), which was partially hydrolyzed and
decarboxylated to give 1.6 However, this process is complicated
by the selective partial hydrolysis of the diester intermediate
3: the formation of the methyl ketone impurity7 via double
decarboxylation was observed as a side product. To circumvent
this drawback, malonate monoester8 and ethyl acetoacetate9
Scheme 2
were used instead of diethyl malonate as an acetate enolate
equivalent. As an alternative route, we have devised the one-
pot Blaise reaction transformation10 of nitrile 4 to 1 (Scheme
3). Although this process is more efficient than the current
commercial process, its highly exothermic nature, use of excess
materials, and use of lachrymatory ethyl bromoacetate leave
room for further improvement for a large-scale operation.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 82-42-8662471. Fax:
82-42-8665754. E-mail: hisin@lgls.co.kr.
(1) The content of the paper has been published as a part of patent. See:
Shin, H.; Choi, B. S.; Lee, J. H. WO 2007064077, 2007.
(2) (a) Miyamoto, T.; Egawa, H.; Shibamori, K.; Matsumoto, J.-I.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987, 24, 1333–1339. (b) Matsumoto, J.-I.;
Miyamoto, T.; Minamida, A.; Nishimura, Y.; Egawa, H.; Nishimura,
H. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 673.
(3) Chu, D. T. W.; Fernandes, P. B.; Claiborne, A. K.; Gracey, E. H.;
Pernet, A. G. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 2363.
Scheme 3
(4) (a) Brighty, K. E.; Castaldi, M. J. Synlett 1996, 1097. (b) Braish, T. F.;
Castaldi, M. J.; Chan, S.; Fox, D. E.; Keltonic, T.; McGarry, J.;
Hawkins, J. M.; Norris, T.; Rose, P. R.; Sieser, J. E.; Sitter, B. J.;
Watson, H., Jr. Synlett 1996, 1100.
(5) Hong, C. Y.; Kim, Y. K.; Chang, J. H.; Kim, S. H.; Choi, H.; Nam,
D. H.; Kim, Y. Z.; Kwak, J. H. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3584.
(6) (a) The reported yield of 1 from the acid chloride 2 is 74%. See:
Bouzard, D.; Di Cesare, P.; Essiz, M.; Jacquet, J. P.; Ledoussal, B.;
Remuzon, P.; Kessler, R. E.; Fung-Tomc, J. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35,
518. (b) Miyamoto, T.; Matsumoto, J.-I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1990,
38, 3211.
On the basis that the copper(I) salt facilitated the decar-
boxylation of malonic acid,11 we envisaged the decarboxylative
Blaise reaction on the premise that zinc ethyl malonate species
would undergo decarboxylation to form the Reformatsky
(7) In an acid-catalyzed decarboxylation of 3 (R ) OEt), ca. 10% (area
% by HPLC) of the methyl ketone impurity was usually formed in
the reaction mixture. The analysis of the isolated 1 showed ca. 2%
contamination of the methyl ketone impurity. 1H NMR data of the
methyl ketone impurity: (300 MHz) δ 7.57 (d, J ) 7.3Hz, 1H), 2.71
(s, 3H).
(10) Shin, H.; Choi, B. S.; Lee, K. K.; Choi, H.-w.; Chang, J. H.; Lee,
K. W.; Nam, D. H.; Kim, N.-S. Synthesis 2004, 2629. (b) Choi, B. S.;
Chang, J. H.; Choi, H.-w.; Kim, Y. K.; Lee, K. K.; Lee, K. W.; Lee,
J. H.; Heo, T.; Nam, D. H.; Shin, H. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2005, 9,
311.
(8) (a) The reported yield of 1 from the acid chloride 2 is 96%. Refer to
ref 2. (b) O’Neill, B. T.; Busch, F. R.; Lehner, R. S. EP 449445, 1991.
(c) Clay, R. J.; Collom, T. A.; Karrick, G. L.; Wemple, J. Synthesis
1993, 290.
(9) The reported yield of 1 from the acid chloride 2 is 70%. See: Urban,
F. J.; Moore, B. S.; Spargo, P. L. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1997, 29,
231.
(11) Toussaint, O.; Capdevielle, P.; Maumy, M. Synthesis 1986, 1029. (b)
Darensbourg, D. J.; Holtcamp, M. W.; Khandelwal, B.; Reibenspies,
J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 531.
1062
•
Vol. 11, No. 6, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op7001694 CCC: $37.00
2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/13/2007