generated could also be continuously drained, achieving an
KS
KT
Stripping constant for liquid–vapour mass transfer
(L min−
1
)
HMF of 20%.
Y
Comparing the C and CD tests, the inconvenience of operating
under C conditions is related to the accumulation of by-products,
whilst through partial draining an optimum reactant concen-
tration and dehydration rates could be fixed. It is true that C tests
at 200 °C and low X0 showed the highest FURY values.
Mass-transfer constant in WT systems (Units)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funds from the Spanish Ministerio
de Economía y Competitividad ENE2009-12743-C04-04 and
from the Gobierno Vasco (Programa de Formación de Personal
Investigador del Departamento de Educación, Universidades
e Investigación). The authors gratefully acknowledge Dow
Chemical for kindly supplying the Amberlyst 70 catalyst.
However, the feasibility of simultaneous N -stripping and X + G
2
feedings should be evaluated using CD type configurations at X
0
−1
similar around 30 g L , which could achieve a FUR of 66% at
Y
7
9% XCONV and high product purity in the condensate stream, as
well as relatively low GCONV
.
4. Conclusions
Furfural production has been studied using Amberlyst 70 as a
heterogeneous acid-catalyst under different operating configur-
References
ations. Batchwise conditions showed low FUR due to enhanced
Y
1
R. Karinen, K. Vilonen and M. Niemelä, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 1002–
016.
side-reactions in the presence of glucose and HMF. However,
nitrogen turned out to be an effective stripping agent. FURY
values of 75% were achieved under continuous feeding con-
ditions. Taking into account that glucose was fed in relatively
1
2 K. J. Zeitsch, First Ed. in Sugar Series, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2000,
vol. 13, 1.
3
D. R. Arnold and J. L. Buzzard, Proc. South African Chem. Eng. Cong.,
003, 3–5.
4 R. Weingarten, J. Cho, W. C. J. Conner and G. W. Huber, Green Chem.,
010, 12, 1423–1429.
2
higher flow rates than xylose, the proposed N -stripping
2
2
configurations are promising. Moreover, high furfural selectivity
5
A. S. Mamman, J. M. Lee, Y. C. Kim, I. T. Hwang, N. J. Park,
was achieved in the condensate stream. The FUR values were
Y
Y. K. Hwang, J. S. Chang and J. S. Hwang, Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin.,
higher using nitrogen than toluene, which enforces the idea that
2
008, 2, 438–454.
6 A. S. Dias, M. Pillinger and A. A. Valente, J. Catal., 2005, 229,
14–423.
N -stripping shows more industrial feasibility with respect to
2
4
other biphasic water/solvent systems. Taking into account the
7
S. Lima, P. Neves, M. M. Antunes, M. Pillinger, N. Ignatyev and
low kinetic performance of A70, further N -stripping studies
2
A. A. Valente, Appl. Catal., A, 2009, 363, 93–99.
should be focused on using hydrothermally stable and selective
heterogeneous catalysts. The method developed during this work
showed promising results as a starting point to produce furan-
based fuel additives from pentosan-rich biomass.
8 Y. C. Kim and H. S. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (Seoul, Repub. Korea),
2001, 7, 424–429.
9
I. Agirrezabal-Telleria, J. Requies, M. B. Güemez and P. L. Arias, Appl.
Catal., B, 2011, 115–116, 178.
10 A. S. Dias, M. Pillinger and A. A. Valente, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater., 2006, 94, 214–225.
1
1 C. Moreau, R. Durand, D. Peyron, J. Duhamet and P. Rivalier, Ind. Crop.
Prod., 1998, 7, 95–99.
2 R. Weingarten, G. A. Tompsett, W. C. Conner and G. W. Huber, J. Catal.,
2011, 279, 174–182.
Nomenclature
1
1
1
−
1
X0
XR
GR
Initial xylose concentration in the reactor (g L )
Xylose concentration in the reactor (g L )
Glucose concentration in the reactor (g L
−
1
3 E. Lam, E. Majid, A. C. W. Leung, J. H. Chong, K. A. Mahmoud and
J. H. T. Luong, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 535–541.
4 A. S. Dias, S. Lima, M. Pillinger and A. A. Valente, Catal. Lett., 2007,
114, 151–160.
−
1
)
XCONV Xylose conversion (%)
GCONV Glucose conversion (%)
15 S. Lima, M. M. Antunes, A. Fernandes, M. Pillinger, M. F. Ribeiro and
A. A. Valente, Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 388, 141–148.
A70
FURR
Amberlyst 70
FUR concentration in the water-phase in the reactor
(
16 R. O’Neill, M. N. Ahmad, L. Vanoye and F. Aiouache, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 2009, 48, 4300–4306.
−1
g L )
FURT FUR concentration in the toluene phase (g L
HMFR HMF concentration in the water-phase in the reactor
17 H. D. Mansilla, J. Baeza, S. Urzua, G. Maturana, J. Villasenor and
−
1
N. Duran, Bioresour. Technol., 1998, 66, 189–193.
8 A. Chareonlimkun, V. Champreda, A. Shotipruk and N. Laosiripojana,
Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101, 4179–4186.
9 I. Agirrezabal-Telleria, A. Larreategui, J. Requies, M. B. Güemez and
P. L. Arias, Bioresour. Technol., 2011, 102, 7478–7485.
)
1
−
1
(
g L )
1
FURC FUR concentration in the condensate stripped stream
−
1
20 G. W. Huber, J. N. Cheda, C. J. Barrett and J. A. Dumesic, Science,
005, 308, 1446–1450.
1 M. A. Vannice, Kinetics of Catalytic Reactions, Springer, 2005, p. 65.
(
g L )
2
HMFC HMF concentration in the condensate stripped stream
2
−
1
(
g L )
22 J. W. Lee, J. Y. Zhu, D. Scordia and T. W. Jeffries, Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol., 2011, 165, 814–822.
2
FURY FUR yield (%)
HMFY HMF yield (%)
3 Y. Román-Leshkov, J. N. Chheda and J. A. Dumesic, Science, 2006, 312,
933–1937.
1
k′
Kinetic constants with respect to the A70 catalyst mass
load
2
4 J. P. Lange, E. van der Heide, B. van Buijtenen and R. Price, Chem-
SusChem, 2012, 5, 150–166.
3140 | Green Chem., 2012, 14, 3132–3140
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012