functionalized at the “back” boron or methine position). That
is, the synthetic methodology and coordination chemistry of
aryltris(pyrazolyl)borates (Figure 1, left) have been well-
developed,4 which has permitted significant advances in iron-
(II) spin-crossover chemistry.5 On the other hand, the chemistry
of analogous tris(pyrazolyl)methane derivatives (Figure 1, right)
are almost unknown because synthetic difficulties render these
derivatives nearly inaccessible by standard routes. The lone
reported example of a tris(pyrazolyl)methyl bound directly to
an arene is PhC(pz2py)3, prepared in a mere 8% yield from
trichlorotoluene and the sodium pyrazolide.6 To make matters
more grim, similar reactions with other pyrazolyls fail to give
usable quantities of desired products.7 It occurred to us during
the course of our investigations into developing new fluorescent
turn-on sensors based on modified aniline derivatives8 that it
may be possible to take advantage of the quinoidal resonance
forms of electron donors such as commercially available
trifluoromethylaniline to provide access to tris(pyrazolyl)-
toluidines via an elimination-addition mechanism, as depicted
in Scheme 1. Derivatives such as H2NC6H4C(pz)3 would also
be appealing since they would contain a built-in entry point for
further functionalization (including the possibility of serving
as monomers for new polyanilines). We now communicate the
successful implementation of this strategy for the preparation
of three new electroactive tris(pyrazolyl)toluidines, p- and o-H2-
NC6H4C(pz)3 and p-EtNHC6H4C(pz)3. Subsequent conversion
of the former to p-BrC6H4C(pz)3 or to p-Et2NHC6H4C(pz)3 is
also described. Future reports will elaborate on the organic and
coordination chemistry of these derivatives.
A Practical Synthesis of
Tris(pyrazolyl)methylaryls
Brendan J. Liddle and James R. Gardinier*
Department of Chemistry, Marquette UniVersity, P.O. Box 1881,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1881
ReceiVed September 5, 2007
The preparation of three tris(pyrazolyl)toluidines from trif-
luoromethylaniline reagents is described that likely takes
advantage of (quinoidal) resonance-stabilized activation of
the C-F bonds. Subsequent transformations lead to two
additional (for a total of five new) tris(pyrazolyl)methylaryls.
This simple reaction is remarkable because only one other
tris(pyrazolyl)methylaryl has been reported previously, be-
cause it is usually very difficult to activate fluoroalkane C-F
bonds, and because of the potential scope of the reaction.
Since the seminal reports on the preparation and coordination
chemistry of tris(pyrazolyl)borates and tris(pyrazolyl)methanes,1
variations on these so-called scorpionate ligands have permeated
all aspects of inorganic chemistry. Substantial research effort
first went into developing multiple generations of tris(pyrazolyl)-
borates, such as developing bulky derivatives to stabilize unusual
coordination complexes.2 On the other hand, the chemistry of
the parent tris(pyrazolyl)methane, HC(pz)3 (pz ) pyrazolyl),
and its derivatives was relegated to near obscurity until an
efficient high-yield synthetic route reported by the Reger group
incited vigorous research on these derivatives (nearly 30 years
after the initial report).3 Currently, there exists a disparity in
the chemistry of certain “third-generation” scorpionates (ligands
FIGURE 1. Third generation scorpionates based on tris(pyrazolyl)-
borates (left) and tris(pyrazolyl)methanes (right).
The optimized one-pot preparative route to tris(pyrazolyl)-
toluidines is found in Scheme 2. A summary of synthetic
variants is presented in Table 1. Several details are worth noting
(4) (a) Dias, H. V. R.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Rangan, K. Inorg. Chem. 2007,
46, 1960. (b) Kisko, J. L.; Hascall, T.; Kimblin, C.; Parkin, G. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 12, 1929. (c) Sohrin, Y.; Kokusen, H.; Matsui,
M. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 3928. (d) White, D. L.; Faller, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1548.
(5) (a) Reger, D. L.; Gardinier, J. R.; Elgin, J. D.; Smith, M. D.; Hautot,
D.; Long, G. J.; Grandjean, F. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 8862. (b) Reger, D.
L.; Gardinier, J. R.; Bakbak, S.; Semeniuc, R. F.; Bunz, U. H. F.; Smith,
M. D. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1035. (c) Reger, D. L.; Gardinier, J. R.;
Smith, M. D.; Shahin, A. M.; Long, G. J.; Rebbouh, L.; Grandjean, F. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 44, 1852. Reger, D. L.; Gardinier, J. R.; Gemmill, W. R.;
Smith, M. D.; Shahin, A. M.; Long, Gary J.; Rebbouh, L.; Grandjean, F. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2303.
(1) (a) Trofimenko, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1842. (b) Trofimenko,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5118. (c) Trofimenko, S. Scorpionates:
The Coordination Chemistry of Polypyrazolylborate Ligands; Imperial
College Press: London, UK, 1999.
(2) For example: (a) Kisko, J. L.; Hascall, T.; Parkin, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 10561. (b) Han, R.; Looney, A.; McNeill, K.; Parkin, G.;
Rheingold, A. L.; Haggerty, B. S. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1993, 49, 105. (c)
Han, R.; Gorrell, I. B.; Looney, A. G.; Parkin, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1991, 10, 717. (d) Gorrell, I. B.; Parkin, G. Inorg. Chem. 1990,
29, 2452.
(6) Humphrey, E. R.; Mann, K. L. V.; Reeves, Z. R.; Behrendt, A.;
Jeffery, J. C.; Maher, J. P.; McCleverty, J. A.; Ward, M. D. New J. Chem.
1999, 23, 417.
(3) (a) Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2005, 249 (5-6),
525. (b) Reger, D. L.; Grattan, T. C.; Brown, K. J.; Little, C. A.; Lamba,
J. J. S.; Rheingold, A. L.; Sommer, R. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 607,
120. (c) Jameson, D. L.; Castellano, R. K.; Reger, D. L.; Collins, J. E.;
Tolman, W. B.; Tokar, C. J. Inorg. Synth. 1998, 32, 51.
(7) Reger, D. L. Private communication.
(8) (a) Liddle, B. J.; Silva, R. M.; Morin, T. J.; Macedo, F. P.; Shukla,
R.; Lindeman, S. V.; Gardinier, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5637. (b)
Liddle, B. J.; Lindeman, S. V.; Reger, D. L.; Gardinier, J. R. Inorg. Chem.
2007, 46, 8484.
10.1021/jo701924w CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/10/2007
9794
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9794-9797