Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 10455−10457
Novel 2-Mercaptopyridine−Ruthenium Complex Exhibiting
Electrochemically Induced Linkage Isomerization Switched On/Off by
Protolysis
Tomohiko Hamaguchi,* Kikujiro Ujimoto, and Isao Ando
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Fukuoka UniVersity, 8-19-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku,
Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
Received June 18, 2007
A ruthenium complex [ruthenium bis(2,2
′
-bipyridine)(2-mercapto-
information. This is an important feature for memory devices.
Write denotes recording information by oxidization or
reduction of the metal center and retaining the information
as the difference in the coordination environment. Read
denotes getting the information back from the complex as
the difference in a property, e.g., UV-vis absorption.
For example, [RuII(NH3)5(DMSO)]2+ (DMSO ) dimethyl
sulfoxide) is one of the most famous molecules exhibiting
electrochemically induced linkage isomerization.4 In this
complex, RuII is coordinated by the S atom of DMSO. After
oxidation of RuII to RuIII, the complex isomerizes to the other
isomer in which RuIII is coordinated by the O atom. The
related complexes5,6 are suitable as candidates for a molecular
memory device. However, they have a problem; information
could be overwritten by an unintended external signal
because they have no mechanism to protect information like
the write-protect tab of a floppy disk. Some carboxamide-
ruthenium complexes6 could solve this problem, but only a
few such complexes have been reported so far.5g
Here, we report a new ruthenium complex, 1H2+, that has
a mechanism to protect information. 1H2+ is designed to
contain a RuII atom and 2-mercaptopyridine in thione form,7
which coordinates to the Ru atom only with the S atom. The
N atom of 2-mercaptopyridine is protonated and does not
coordinate to the Ru atom. Linkage isomerization from S-
to N-bound is difficult in oxidation of 1H2+ because
protonation of 2-mercaptopyridine prevents the N atom from
pyridine)(pyridine)](PF6)2 was crystallographically characterized from
its deprotonated form and was electrochemically investigated. In
the deprotonated complex, the 2-mercaptopyridine ligand coordi-
nates to the Ru atom only by the S atom; therefore, the N atom
of the 2-mercaptopyridine ligand can be protonated. In a CH3CN
solution, the complex shows a reversible redox couple attributed
/
II
to RuIII
complex gives irreversible voltammograms, implying electrochemi-
cally induced linkage isomerization between RuII S and RuIII
N.
Analysis of the observed cyclic voltammograms gave the equilib-
−S. The addition of a base to the CH3CN solution of the
−
−
rium and rate constants for linkage isomerization: KII
)
1.2
×
NS
17
1018, KIII
)
0.64, kII
)
)
5
×
10 s-1, kII
)
4
×
10- s-1, kIII
NS
NS
SN
NS
1
)
0.26 s-1, and kIII
0.40 s-
.
SN
Molecular devices,1,2 especially molecular memory,2 which
is interesting as an advanced information storage device, have
received a lot of attention. Molecular memory is able to store
information into one molecule and should help in increasing
the storage density. Such devices require molecular bista-
bility, i.e., a molecule with two or more stable states that
are reversibly exchanged by external stimuli. Transition-metal
complexes exhibiting electrochemically induced linkage
isomerization have been reported3 as model compounds for
molecular memory. They contain an ambidentate ligand
bound to a metal center and exhibit exchange of the coor-
dination atom for another atom on applying voltage sufficient
to oxidize or reduce the metal center. A different coordina-
tion environment produces different properties of the com-
plex; therefore, those complexes are able to write and read
(4) Scotto, N.; Yen, A.; Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 2542.
(5) (a) Giesbrecht, E.; Rojas, R. L. E.; Toma, H. E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1985, 2469. (b) Johansson, O.; Lomoth, R. Chem. Commun.
2005, 1578. (c) Tomita, A.; Sano, M. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5825.
(d) Tomita, A.; Sano, M. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 200. (e) Sano, M.;
Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 705. (f) Silva, D. O.; Toma, H. E.
Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72, 1705. (g) Sens, C.; Rodr´ıguez, M.; Romero,
I.; Llobet, A.; Parella, T.; Sullivan, B. P.; Buchholz, J. B. Inorg. Chem.
2003, 42, 2040.
(6) (a) Fairlie, D. P.; Ilan, Y.; Taube, H. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 1029.
(b) Chou, M. H.; Brunschwing, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N.; Yeh, A.;
Chang, R. C.; Lin, C.-T. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 5347.
(7) (a) Bajaj, H. C.; Das, A.; van Eldik, R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1998, 1563. (b) Deeming, A. J.; Hardcastle, K. I.; Meah M. N.; Bates,
P. A.; Dawes, H. M.; Hursthouse, M. B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1988, 227.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thama@
fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
(1) (a) Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Silva, A. P.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A.
J. M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1997,
97, 1515. (b) Licchelli, M.; Pallavicini, P.; Fabbrizzi, L. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1999, 32, 846. (c) Ward, M. D. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1995, 24, 121.
(2) (a) Carroll, R. L.; Gorman, C. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
4378. (b) Fabbrizzi, L.; Pallavicini, P.; Amendola, V. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 2001, 216-217, 435.
(3) Toma, H. E.; Rocha, R. C. Croat. Chem. Acta 2001, 74, 499.
10.1021/ic701186k CCC: $37.00
Published on Web 11/09/2007
© 2007 American Chemical Society
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 25, 2007 10455