P. C. Junk, M. M. Lezhnina et al.
FULL PAPER
Tb(paba)3PU, Tb(paba)3bipyPU and Tb(paba)3phenPU: For the
preparation of the transparent polyurethanes a commercial system
consisting of a hexamethylene diisocyanate prepolymer and a po-
lyol was used (from Lackwerke Peters, 47906 Kempen, Germany,
VT 3402 KK). To determine the exact amounts of polyol to be
substituted by the corresponding Tb complexes, the NCO content
was determined using chlorobenzene as solvent, dibutylamine as
reagent and bromothymol blue as the indicator for the HDI, for
the OH number of the polyol, pyridine, phthalic anhydride and
phenolphthalein were used, according to procedures previously de-
scribed.[21] Analytically, 5.40 mmol NCO/g diisocyanate and
5.34 mmol OH/g polyol were found.
filter (from Schott, Germany, UG11, 3 mm). The change of emis-
sion was monitored through a green interference filter (from LOT-
Oriel, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, 546FS10-50) and focussed on a
CCD camera (from Acton Research, Spectrum MM) through a
Nikon® lens at a distance of 25 cm. Light source, filters and detec-
tion unit were attached to a housing, which contained the samples
at the bottom. A freshly prepared Al mirror (thermal evaporation,
25 cm2) was used to turn the horizontally entering beam onto the
samples at the bottom, the camera was aligned on top of the hous-
ing. Background radiation was accounted for by subtraction of
BaSO4 measurements prior to interpretation.
Xray Crystallography Studies: For all compounds X-ray quality
crystals were sealed and mounted in thin-walled capillaries, with
hemispheres of data collected at room temperature with a Bruker
To obtain dilute samples for efficiency measurements, the com-
plexes (2 mmol) were dissolved in DMF and added to the hexa-
methylene diisocyanate (1 g, ratio paba: NCO group approximately SMART CCD diffractometer (Mo-Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å)
1:100), DMF was evaporated in vacuo and the complex solution
in diisocyanate thus obtained was mixed with the polyol (1:1 ratio),
the mixture was placed in a transparent cuvette of 1 cm path
length, air bubbles were removed under vacuum. The polymerisa-
tion to give the polyurethane was carried out at 60 °C in a drying
chamber. Polymers containing more than 1·10–2 mol complex/L
could be prepared in an analogous manner. For such samples, the
consumption of HDI by Tb(paba)3 or was accounted for in that a
lower amount of polyol was used. However, the emission intensities
(not quantum yields) were at a maximum at approximately
1·10–2 mol complex/L.
using the omega scan mode. Data sets were corrected for absorp-
tion using the program SADABS.[22] For all structures, the position
of the heavy atoms were found using the Patterson method for
heavy atoms and refined on F2 using SHELXL97–2[23] with X-
SEED as the graphic interface.[24] All non-hydrogen atoms were
located and were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. Hy-
drogen atoms were placed in calculated positions (riding model)
and were not refined. For compounds 2, 6, 8 and 9 hydrogen atoms
were located on the NH2 groups and on water molecules and were
refined isotropically. For compound 7 hydrogen atoms were not
located on heteroatoms and were not included in the refinement.
Crystal data, and a summary of data collection are listed below.
Optical Characterisation: All emission and excitation intensities in
the spectra reproduced are scaled against each other, such as to
grant direct comparability.
CCDC-607965 (for 2), -607966 (for 6), -607967 (for 7), -607968 (for
8) and -607969 (for 9) contain the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Emission and excitation spectra of the solids were recorded at an
angle of incidence of ca. 50° using a praying mantis type of set up
to allow horizontal sample positioning without a cover. Reflectance
spectra were obtained using an integrating sphere with a diameter
of 70 mm and 10 mm port openings vs. commercial white and black
references (Labsphere), and BaSO4, respectively. Two Acton 300
Monochromators of 300 mm focal length were thus synchronously
scanned. The intensity of the 450 W Xe source was detected with
an Acton Photomultiplier tube P2, the gratings had 1200 gmm–1.
The excitation spectra of Tb(paba)3HDI, Tb(paba)3PDI and
Tb(paba)3DPDI presented in Figure 9 were corrected for the lamp
and spectrometer profiles with BaMgAl10O17: Eu (“BAM”).
Tb(paba)3, Tb(paba)3bipy, Tb(paba)3phen were also measured
against Lumogen Red doped PMMA powders (doping level
50 ppm), whose quantum yield was taken as a constant 42% in the
excitation range between 250 nm and 500 nm. Relative quantum
yields of the clear PU composite monoliths [Tb(paba)3PU,
Tb(paba)3bipyPU, Tb(paba)3phenPU], prepared in 1 cm cuvettes,
were determined relative to a Lumen Red/PMMA disk of 3 mm
thickness. Due to the confinement in the reference disk of lower
thickness, some loss due to lateral propagation of emitted light
within the disk is possible, but could not be accounted for, because
neither sample cuvette nor reference disk could be inserted into the
integrating sphere. Additionally, we would like to point out that
the quantum efficiencies given, while reproducible within our op-
tical setup, may still carry imprecisions, not the least owing to the
lack of a suitable green emitting standard with continuous quan-
tum yield in the spectral excitation range between 250 and 500 nm
(estimated imprecision margin Ϯ10%). However, the general trends
described and discussed will not be affected.
Crystal Data for Compound 2: C21H20GdN3O7, M = 583.65,
0.24ϫ0.18ϫ0.15 mm, monoclinic, space group P21/n (No. 14), a
= 9.7452(9), b = 22.736(2), c = 9.8229(9) Å, β = 99.9290(10)°, V =
2143.9(3) Å3, Z = 4, Dc = 1.808 g/cm3, F(000) = 1148, 9744 reflec-
tions collected, 3072 unique (Rint = 0.0665). Final GooF = 1.045,
R1 = 0.0287, wR2 = 0.0691, R indices based on 2639 reflections
with IϾ2σ(I) (refinement on F2), 323 parameters, 0 restraints. Lp
and absorption corrections applied, µ = 3.142 mm–1.
Crystal Data for Compound 6: C33H30N5O8Tb, M = 783.54,
¯
0.36ϫ0.35ϫ0.32 mm, triclinic, space group P1 (No. 2), a =
10.4554(8), b = 12.3129(9), c = 14.0035(10) Å, α = 92.8650(10), β
= 102.8890(10), γ = 109.0390(10)°, V = 1646.4(2) Å3, Z = 2, Dc =
1.581 g/cm3, F(000) = 784, 7545 reflections collected, 4665 unique
(Rint = 0.0461). Final GooF = 1.050, R1 = 0.0466, wR2 = 0.1283,
R indices based on 4260 reflections with IϾ2σ(I) (refinement on
F2), 466 parameters, 15 restraints. Lp and absorption corrections
applied, µ = 2.206 mm–1.
Crystal Data for Compound 7: C230H228N38O66Tb6, M = 5534.02,
¯
0.32ϫ0.30ϫ0.15 mm, triclinic, space group P1 (No. 2), a =
17.460(3), b = 18.615(3), c = 19.377(3) Å, α = 80.199(3), β =
72.342(3), γ = 73.823(3)°, V = 5738.3(14) Å3, Z = 1, Dc = 1.601 g/
cm3, F(000) = 2792, 26873 reflections collected, 16542 unique (Rint
= 0.0803). Final GooF = 1.011, R1 = 0.0768, wR2 = 0.1882, R
indices based on 9943 reflections with IϾ2σ(I) (refinement on F2),
1531 parameters, 0 restraints. Lp and absorption corrections ap-
plied, µ = 1.918 mm–1.
The photochemical degradation data of the samples presented in
Figure 9 were collected under irradiation with a 150-W Xe lamp
that was shone onto an area of 400 cm2 through a UV band pass
Crystal Data for Compound 8: C33H30EuN5O8, M = 776.58,
0.20ϫ0.20ϫ0.20 mm, triclinic, space group P1 (No. 2), a =
10.4543(11), b = 12.2021(13), c = 14.0607(15) Å, α = 92.904(2), β
¯
300
www.eurjic.org
© 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 291–301