Segregated Arrays of Multiple Donor and Acceptor Units
A R T I C L E S
Figure 1. (a) Absorption spectral change of DP24 (1.5 × 10-7 M) upon titration with Py2F3 ([Py2F3]/[DP24] ) 0, 1.1, 2.3, 4.6, 6.8, 9.1, 11, 16, 23, 34, 52,
80, 126, 194, and 240) in CHCl3 at 25 °C. (b) Change in absorbance (A0 - A) of DP24, monitored at 415.0 nm, as a function of [Py] ()2 × [Py2F3]), and
its fitting profile. (c) Binding affinities (log K) of the pyridine units in Py2F1 (red), Py2F2 (green), and Py2F3 (blue) toward the zinc porphyrin units in P1,
DP6, DP12, and DP24 in CHCl3 at 25 °C. (d) A snapshot of gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of a mixture of DP24 and Py2F3 ([Py2F3]/[DP24] ) 25) with
CHCl3 as an eluent.
transfer. We and other groups have reported that some dendritic
multiporphyrin arrays including DPm, upon photoexcitation,
display highly efficient energy migration characteristics analo-
gous to those of the biological light-harvesting systems.6a,9
Hence, we decided to make use of zinc complexes of multi-
porphyrin dendrimers DPm with a certain structural rigidity for
an attempt to construct a concentric double layer of spatially
segregated arrays composed of multiple D and A units (Scheme
1). As an electron acceptor for DPm, we chose a fullerene such
as C60 because of its small reorganization energy and excellent
electron-accepting properties.10 Thus, we synthesized Py2Fn
having 1-3 fullerene units (n ) 1-3), where the bipyridine
(Py2) unit was expected to coordinate strongly in a bidentate
fashion to two neighboring zinc porphyrin units in DPm, thereby
allowing the formation of a fullerene array outside of the zinc
porphyrin array on the dendrimer surface (DPm⊃Py2Fn). Here,
one can change the packing densities of these D and A units in
the photoactive layer by varying the m and n values in the DPm
and Py2Fn components, respectively, and might therefore be able
to modulate the photoinduced charge-separation event.
bipyridine-terminated alcohols bearing 1-3 hydroxyl groups.11
In CHCl3, DP6 showed an absorption spectral profile typical of
5,15-diarylporphyrin zinc complexes, having a Soret absorption
band centered at 414 nm and Q-bands at 542 and 578 nm.
Compared with DP6, DP24 showed a broad Soret absorption band
centered at 415 nm, while DP12 showed a blue-shifted shoulder
at 398 nm along with a major Soret band at 411 nm. The latter
observation suggests that DP12 may adopt a planar geometry
with a H-aggregate-type arrangement of the zinc porphyrin units
along its periphery.7 On the other hand, Py2F1-Py2F3 all
displayed an electronic absorption band centered at 326 nm.11
Upon excitation at 326 nm, all Py2Fn fluoresced at 694 nm from
their fullerene units.10,11
As expected, DPm (m ) 6, 12, and 24) bound Py2Fn (n )
1-3) strongly to form stable DPm⊃Py2Fn. For example, upon
titration with Py2F3 in CHCl3 at 25 °C, DP24 (1.5 × 10-7 M)
displayed a large spectral change in the Soret and Q-bands
(Figure 1a), characteristic of the axial coordination of zinc
porphyrins, with a clear saturation profile at a molar ratio
[Py2F3]/[DP24] exceeding 12 (Figure 1b). This spectral change
profile did not give distinct isosbestic points possibly due to a
large effect of the multivalency of the complexation between
DP24 and Py2F3. However, the average binding affinity (K), as
estimated by simply assuming a one-to-one coordination
between the individual zinc porphyrin and pyridine units, was
Results and Discussion
Zinc complexes of multiporphyrin dendrimers DPm (m ) 6,
12, and 24) were synthesized according to a method analogous
to that reported previously for chiroptical sensing of chiral
bipyridine compounds.7 On the other hand, fullerene-appended
bipyridine ligands Py2Fn (n ) 1-3) were synthesized by
coupling of a fullerene-containing carboxylic acid precursor with
1.2 × 106 M-1 11
. This value is more than 2 orders of magnitude
greater than association constants reported for monodentate
coordination between zinc porphyrins and pyridine derivatives.12
Other combinations of DPm and Py2Fn for the titration all showed
analogous spectral change profiles with a marked saturation
tendency at a mole ratio [Py2Fn]/[DPm] close to m/2.11 Figure
1c shows average binding affinities K between the zinc
porphyrin and pyridine units, which are almost comparable to
one another in a range 1.1 × 106-4.4 × 106 M-1 irrespective
of the m and n values in DPm and Py2Fn, respectively. We also
found that resulting complexes DPm⊃Py2Fn are all stable under
conditions for gel permeation chromatography (GPC). For
example, a CHCl3 solution (0.5 mL) of a mixture of DP24 and
Py2F3 ([DP24] ) 1.6 × 10-5 M, [Py2F3]/[DP24] ) 25) was loaded
onto a Bio-beads S-X1 GPC column and then eluted with
CHCl3. As shown in Figure 1d, the chromatographic profile
(6) For dendritic multiporphyrin arrays: (a) Yeow, E. K. L.; Ghiggino, K. P.;
Reek, J. N. H.; Crossley, M. J.; Bosman, A. W.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.;
Meijer, E. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2596-2606. (b) Choi, M.-S.;
Aida, T.; Yamazaki, T.; Yamazaki, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
3194-3198. (c) Choi, M.-S.; Aida, T.; Yamazaki, T.; Yamazaki, I. Chem.
Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2667-2678. (d) Benites, M. R.; et al. J. Mater. Chem.
2002, 12, 65-80. (e) Choi, M.-S.; Yamazaki, T.; Yamazaki, I.; Aida, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 150-158. (f) Imahori, H. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2004, 108, 6130-6143. (g) Solladie´, N., Sooambar, C., Herschbach, H.,
Strub, J.-M., Leize, E., Van Dorsselaer, A., Talarico, A. M., Ventura, B.,
Flamigni, L. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1504-1507.
(7) Li, W.-S.; Jiang, D.-L.; Suna, Y.; Aida, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
7700-7702.
(8) (a) Mcdermott, G.; Prince, S. M.; Freer, A. A.; Hawthornthwaite-Lawless,
A. M.; Papiz, M. Z.; Cogdell, R. J.; Isaacs, N. W. Nature 1995, 374, 517-
521. (b) Karrasch, S.; Bullough, P. A.; Ghosh, R. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 631-
638. (c) Pullerits, T.; Sundstro¨m, V. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 381-389.
(9) (a) Cho, S.; Li, W.-S.; Yoon, M.-C.; Ahn, T. K.; Jiang, D.-L.; Kim, J.;
Aida, T.; Kim, D. Chem. Eur. J., in press. (b) Fujitsuka, M.; Hara, M.;
Tojo, S.; Okada, A.; Troiani, V.; Solladie´, N.; Majima, T. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2005, 109, 33-35.
(11) See Supporting Information.
(12) Sanders, J. K. M.; Bampos, N.; Clyde-Watson, Z.; Darling, S. L.; Hawley,
J. C.; Kim, H.-J.; Mak, C. C.; Webb, S. J. In Axial Coordination Chemistry
of Metalloporphyrins; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; The
Porphyrin Handbook; Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; Vol. 3, p 30.
(10) (a) Guldi, D. M.; Prato, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 695-703. (b) Guldi,
D. M. Chem. Commun. 2000, 321-327. (c) Thomas, K. G.; George, M.
V. HelV. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 1291-1308.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 32, 2006 10529