Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 1. Reaction Optimization
b
c
entry
photocat.
4CzIPN
Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6
Ir(ppy)3
N-alkoxyazinium
additive (equiv)
yield (%)
E/Z
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
B (2.0)
C (2.0)
D (2.0)
A (1.5)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
A (2.0)
TMSCN (1.5)
TMSCN (1.5)
TMSCN (1.5)
TMSCN (1.5)
TMSCl (1.5)
54
57
53
70
18
10
61
88
50
0
28
60
8
4
NR
78/22
89/11
83/17
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
TMSCN (1.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0), NaHCO3 (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0), KH2PO4 (2.0)
TMSCN (2.0)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
>20/1
d
16
Ru(bpy)3Cl2
TMSCN (2.0)
NR
a
b
c
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), HCOOEt (3 mL), blue LED, Ar, rt, 12 h. Isolated yield. NR = no reaction. E/Z ratio was determined by
d
1H NMR. Without light.
to generate α,β-unsaturated esters triggered by the addition of
an alkoxylcarbonyl radical has not been reported.
photocatalyst, the yield of 3a was improved to 70% yield, and a
high E selectivity was observed (E/Z > 20/1). Using TMSCl
instead of TMSCN, or in the absence of the additive, the
desired ester was detected in a lower yield, and the mixture of
difunctionalization products of styrene was observed, indicat-
ing that the addition of TMSCN is essential (entries 5 and 6).
Thus, we evaluated the amount of the reagent and found that
using 2.0 equiv of TMSCN as the additive provided the best
result, giving 3a in 88% yield with excellent E selectivity
(entries 7 and 8). Employing other N-alkoxyazinium salts as
the additive delivered the desired product in a decreased yield
(entries 9−11). Reduction of the A loading to 1.5 equiv led to
a lower yield, and we reasoned that the concentration of the in
situ generated isopropoxy radical is important (entry 12). The
addition of bases, such as NaHCO3 and KH2PO4, resulted in
suppression of the transformation (entries 13 and 14). Without
the photocatalyst or light irradiation, the reaction could not
proceed, suggesting that both photocatalyst and light are
critical for the reaction (entries 15 and 16).
The scope of alkenes was subsequently explored with the
optimal conditions (Scheme 2). As shown in Scheme 2,
styrenes bearing electron-donating groups, such as methyl and
methoxyl groups, delivered the expected products in moderate
to good yields (3b−e). Halogen and phenyl groups were
compatible (3f−j). Notably, a boronic ester substituent on the
phenyl ring was also tolerated. 2-Vinylnaphthalene and 1,3,5-
trimethyl-2-vinylbenzene could be used to deliver product 3l in
44% yield and 3m in 39% yield. Moreover, the 1,1-diaryl-
substituted ethylenes underwent the reaction smoothly to
afford the corresponding products (3n−u). α-Methylstyrene
was also a suitable substrate (3v). Gratifyingly, when we used
Recently, our group reported a visible-light-driven divergent
difunctionalization of alkenes with alkyl formates as the
alkoxylcarbonyl radical sources in a metal-free fashion.12 In
the proposed mechanism, nucleophiles can react with carbon
cation intermediates to afford alkanoate products. In this
regard, we envisioned that the carbon cation intermediates may
be converted to α,β-unsaturated esters via deprotonation in the
absence of nucleophiles. Nevertheless, in the reported system,
we found that alkanoate products could also be obtained
without external nucleophiles due to the existence of in situ
generated alcohols, including isopropanol from the isopropoxy
radical and another alcohol from the transesterification of
isopropanol and the alkyl formate. Thus, we speculated that
α,β-unsaturated esters might be obtained successfully by
trapping the in situ generated free alochols. Herein, we
described a visible-light-driven oxidative alkoxycarbonylation
of alkenes initiated by the intermolecular addition of
alkoxycarbonyl radicals for the preparation of α,β-unsaturated
esters using alkyl formates as the carbonyl source.
On the basis of our hypothesis, we initially opted to employ
the silicon containing reagent TMSCN as the trapper of in situ
generated free alcohols. To our delight, we found that, by using
styrene (1a) and ethyl formate (2a) as substrates, 1,2,3,5-
tetrakis(carbazol-9-yl)-4,6-dicyanobenzene (4CzIPN, 2 mol %)
as the photocatalyst, and A as the oxidant and oxygen radical
suppler, ethyl cinnamate (3a) was obtained successfully in 54%
yield (E/Z = 78/22) under blue LED irradiation (Table 1,
entry 1). Subsequently, other photocatalysts were investigated
(entries 2−4). Gratifyingly, when Ru(bpy)3Cl2 was used as the
3940
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3939−3943