2910
M. A. K. Vogel et al.
LETTER
Willaredt, J.; Dambacher, T.; Breuer, T.; Ottaway, C.;
Fletschinger, M.; Boele, J.; Fritz, H.; Putzas, D.; Rotter, H.
W.; Bordwell, F. G.; Satish, A. V.; Ji, G. Z.; Peters, E. M.;
Peters, K.; von Schnering, H. G.; Walz, L. Liebigs Ann.
1996, 7, 1055; and references cited therein.
Acknowledgment
Financial support by the Agency for Science Technology and Re-
search (A*STAR Singapore) is gratefully acknowledged. We are
indebted to Lanxess Deutschland GmbH for the generous donation
of nonafluorobutane-1-sulfonyl fluoride.
(15) This mode of reactivity termed as internal quenching was
originally described by Corey and Gross for highly regio-
and stereoselective synthesis of silyl enolates by
References and Notes
deprotonation of carbonyl compounds with lithium
dialkylamide bases in the presence of trialkylsilyl chlorides.
See: Corey, E. J.; Gross, A. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
495.
(1) (a) Scott, W. J.; McMurry, J. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21,
47. (b) Ritter, K. Synthesis 1993, 735. (c) Cacchi, S. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 45. (d) Brückner, R.; Suffert, J.
Synlett 1999, 657.
(2) For Heck reaction, see: (a) Webel, M.; Reissig, H.-U.
Synlett 1997, 1141. (b) Bräse, S. Synlett 1999, 1654.
(c) Lyapkalo, I. M.; Webel, M.; Reissig, H.-U. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 4189. (d) Lyapkalo, I. M.; Webel, M.; Reissig,
H.-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3646. (e) Högermeier, J.;
Reissig, H.-U.; Brüdgam, I.; Hartl, H. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2004, 346, 1868. (f) Lyapkalo, I. M.; Högermeier, J.;
Reissig, H.-U. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7721. (g) Vogel, M.
A. K.; Stark, C. B. W.; Lyapkalo, I. M. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 1019.
(16) While THF is more convenient and environmentally benign
solvent, DMF is found to be advantageous for the Pd-
catalyzed cross-couplings of alkenyl nonaflates.2g,5b,8 Hence,
should one choose to carry out a subsequent coupling
reaction without isolation of the nonaflate 4, DMF is a
preferable solvent for the one-pot nonaflation–coupling
sequence.
(17) General Procedure: A one-necked round-bottomed
reaction flask equipped with a three-way tap and a teflon-
coated magnetic stirring bar was heated with a heat-gun
under vacuum for a few minutes and then cooled under an
atmosphere of dry argon. A solvent (1 mL), a carbonyl
compound 3 (1.00 mmol) and NfF (1.15 mmol) were
successively added via syringe into the reaction flask. The
mixture was cooled to 0 °C under vigorous stirring before
P-base (1.15 mmol) was added dropwise. The three-way tap
was quickly replaced with a glass stopper, and the reaction
mixture was stirred at r.t. unless stated otherwise for
a-methylcycloalkanones and aldehydes 3j,k (see Table 1).
After the carbonyl compound 3 had been fully consumed (1H
NMR control), the resulting mixture was quenched with H2O
(5 mL) and extracted with pentane (4 × 25 mL). The
combined organic phase was washed with H2O (20 mL) and
dried (MgSO4). After the volatiles were removed carefully
under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator (≥ 100 mbar
for 4a; £20 °C water-bath temperature for all the
(3) For Negishi reaction, see: Bellina, F.; Ciucci, D.; Rossi, R.;
Vergamini, P. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 2103.
(4) For Stille reaction, see: (a) Wada, A.; Ieki, Y.; Ito, M.
Synlett 2002, 1061. (b) Wada, A.; Ieki, Y.; Nakamura, S.;
Ito, M. Synthesis 2005, 1581.
(5) For Suzuki reaction, see: (a) Högermeier, J.; Reissig, H.-U.
Synlett 2006, 2759. (b) Högermeier, J.; Reissig, H.-U.
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2410.
(6) For Sonagashira reaction, see ref. 4 and: (a) Suffert, J.;
Eggers, A.; Scheuplein, S. W.; Brückner, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 4177. (b) Okauchi, T.; Yano, T.; Fukamachi,
T.; Ichikawa, J.; Minami, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
5337. (c) Lyapkalo, I. M.; Vogel, M. A. K. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4019; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 4124.
(7) (a) Zimmer, R.; Webel, M.; Reissig, H.-U. J. Prakt. Chem.
1998, 340, 274; and references cited therein. (b) Lyapkalo,
I. M.; Webel, M.; Reissig, H.-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
1015. (c) Aulenta, F.; Reissig, H.-U. Synlett 2006, 2993.
(8) Lyapkalo, I. M.; Webel, M.; Reissig, H.-U. Synlett 2001,
1293.
compounds), the residue was subjected to flash
chromatography [silica gel, pentane for 4a–j, hexane–
EtOAc (1:1) for 4k] to give pure enol nonaflates 4 as
colorless or yellowish liquids.
(18) Kinetically controlled nonaflation of a-methylcyclo-
alkanones 3f,g and aldehydes 3j,k was carried out according
to the above procedure except that the temperature was kept
at –30 °C in the case of 3f,j,k, and at –20 °C in the case of
3g. For the conversion of aldehydes 3j,k, 1.08 equivalents of
P1-base was used.
(9) Subramanian, L. R.; Bentz, H.; Hanack, M. Synthesis 1973,
293.
(10) Bürger, H.; Heyder, F.; Pawelke, G.; Niederprüm, H. J.
Fluorine Chem. 1979, 13, 25l.
(11) (a) Lithium amide bases readily react with NfF even at low
temperature to give the anticipated nonafluorobutane-1-
sulfonamides: Lyapkalo, I. M.; Reissig, H.-U.; Schäfer, A.;
Wagner, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 4206. (b) For this
reason, only the stepwise procedure is possible. See refs. 5b
and 8.
(12) Trialkylamines are not basic enough to promote the
nonaflation whereas DBU gives low conversions due to the
side reaction with NfF. The results will be reported in a
subsequent full account.
(13) It has the highest basicity (pKa = 28.35 in MeCN) among
commercially available P1-bases: Schwesinger, R.;
Willaredt, J.; Schlemper, H.; Keller, M.; Schmitt, D.; Fritz,
H. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 2435.
(14) (a) Commercially available as a 2 M solution in THF (pKa =
33.49 in MeCN). (b) According to the primary
classification given by Schwesinger, the subscript
designates the number of P-atoms in the molecule. For the
synthesis and properties of P2- or higher-order phosphazene
bases, see: Schwesinger, R.; Schlemper, H.; Hasenfratz, C.;
(19) A general synthesis of alkynes or allenes from acyclic
ketones and NfF depending on the base employed and the
structural features of the ketones will be described by us
elsewhere: Vogel, M. A. K.; Stark, C. B. W.; Lyapkalo, I.
M.; manuscript in preparation.
(20) Spectroscopic Data: 1H NMR (400.23 MHz) and 13C NMR
(100.65 MHz) data in CDCl3 (d in ppm from internal SiMe4)
of the selected products 4 are given below.
4b: 1H NMR (400.23 MHz, CDCl3): d = 0.99 (d, 3J = 6.4 Hz,
3 H, Me), 1.39–1.49 (1 H), 1.68–1.87 (3 H), 2.20–2.34 (2 H),
2.35–2.45 (1 H) (all m, 3 × CH2, CHMe), 5.73 (m, 1 H,
CH=). 13C NMR (100.65 MHz, CDCl3): d = 20.6 (Me), 27.3
(CHMe), 27.4, 30.6, 32.0 (all CH2), 118.0 (CH=C), 149.3
(CH=C). 4e: 1H NMR (400.23 MHz, C6D6): d = 2.99 (s, 2 H,
CH2), 6.17 (s, 1 H, CH=), 6.86–6.89 (1 H), 6.94–7.08 (all m,
3 H, CHAr). 13C NMR (100.65 MHz, C6D6): d = 37.5 (CH2),
119.8 (CH=C), 122.4, 123.9, 126.3, 127.3 (all CHAr), 137.7,
140.3 (CAr), 153.7 (CH=C). 4h: 1H NMR (400.23 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 1.13 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, Me), 2.30–2.36 (m, 2
Synlett 2007, No. 18, 2907–2911 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York