A R T I C L E S
Cianci et al.
mobile. In contrast, with more polar solvents like acetonitrile
or dioxane, the removal of weakly associated water is likely to
be effective16 (the soaking medium will reach a low water
activity). Although we might expect ion-pairing to be promoted
under these conditions, the structures reported in polar organic
solvents have not shown this. However, the cations most
commonly used in protein crystallization, Na+ and NH4+, are
isoelectronic with water and may often be modeled as water
oxygens, although their coordination with other atoms is
monitored. A further issue is that counterions may be rather
more mobile, or perhaps have several alternative sites with
partial occupancies, which would make them hard to resolve.
Counterion sites can be located more clearly if heavier elements
are used.17-23
and, thereby, of the enhanced catalytic activity in the presence
of CsCl in acetonitrile.
Material and Methods
Crystallization. Subtilisin Carlsberg was purchased from Sigma
(product code: P5380) and used for crystallization without further
purification. The protein powder was dissolved in 330 mM Na-
cacodylate buffer at pH 5.6 to a concentration of 10 mg/mL.
Subtilisin was crystallized by the batch method from buffer solution
saturated with Na2SO4 ∼13% (w/v) as precipitant.32 Long needle-
like crystals grew over a period of two weeks of typical dimensions
50 × 50 × 400 µm3. They were stored in mother liquor for up to
6 weeks, with no evidence for difference in catalytic activity over
this storage period.
Cs Soaking, Cross-Linking, and Acetonitrile Wash. Soaking
with CsCl or other salts and glutaraldehyde cross-linking was
performed in a single step, to reduce the number of washes and
transfers. This reduces the chances of osmotic shocks to the crystals
(very often fatal for the quality of diffraction). So the soak solution
was prepared freshly by mixing 2 volumes of 25% aqueous
glutaraldehyde with 3 volumes of 250 mM Na-cacodylate buffer
pH 6.5 containing 25% v/v glycerol and, where required, 1.5 M
salt. Crystals were soaked in this for 15 min, with vortexing in the
case of suspensions of multiple crystals for activity assay. Washing
in acetonitrile followed immediately. For crystallography, individual
crystals were washed 5 times with acetonitrile for 10 s, again
following the protocols described elsewhere.25 For catalytic activity
measurements, washing required vortexing and settling of the
suspension, with each wash taking about 90 s. There were two
washes in pure acetonitrile, then two in the reaction medium,
acetonitrile containing 1% (v/v) H2O and 1 M 1-propanol. Finally,
crystals were resuspended in reaction medium and preincubated at
25 °C with shaking for 20 min, with vortexing and if necessary
gentle poking to break up aggregated crystals.
Catalytic Activity Determination. A solution of n-acetyl
tyrosine ethyl ester in the reaction medium was added to the
suspension of crystals to give a final concentration of 10 mM. The
reaction mixture was incubated with shaking at 25 °C, with periodic
removal of small supernatant samples for analysis. Conversion to
the propyl ester was followed by HPLC as described,33 and the
initial rate was estimated from at least 5 points on the linear progress
curve. After the reaction, the mixture was centrifuged and the
supernatant was decanted. The pellet of crystals was solubilized
by heating in 1 M NaOH at 100 °C for 30 min, then the protein
content was estimated from the A280 of the cooled solution. This
value was used to estimate the initial rate in specific activity units.
Crystallography Data Collection and Structure Refinement.
Data collection was performed on SRS BL10,34 Daresbury Labora-
tory. A fluorescence scan showed a peak at 5721.51 eV. Diffraction
data were collected using softer X-rays35,36 at the Cs L1 edge (2.167
Å) and processed using the HKL2000 package.37
The structure was solved by molecular replacement using
MolRep,38 and refined with Refmac 5.0.39 Finally, anomalous
difference Fourier maps were calculated and electron density peaks
contoured at 4sigma level or higher were taken into consideration.
Ions were assigned on the basis of coordination geometry, map
peak height, B-factor, and occupancy of each site. Final Rfactor and
Rfree were 0.16 and 0.23 respectively for the Cs+ ion model (Cs-
ACN).
The protease subtilisin Carlsberg has the status of a model
in low-water enzymology, and structures have been reported
for crystals soaked in dioxane24 and acetonitrile.25,14 It has a
catalytic Asp-His-Ser triad, which must bear a net negative
charge for good catalytic activity, as found in alkaline aqueous
solutions. The possible counterions in low dielectric media and
their effects have been discussed.8 Counterion effects may also
contribute to a much studied phenomenon when lyophilized
enzyme powders are used as catalysts in organic media. Activity
of subtilisin and other enzymes is increased enormously by
drying with an excess of neutral salts like KCl,26-31 and
specificity can also be favorably altered.29
In this paper, the placement of ions in crystals of subtilisin
Carlsberg soaked with CsCl and acetonitrile is investigated. In
parallel, the catalytic activity of the crystals suspended in
acetonitrile has been determined. Interestingly, treatment with
CsCl was found to increase the activity several fold. Using X-ray
crystallography with anomalous dispersion, clear sites for Cs+
and Cl- ions are identified around the protein molecule, where
they may be affecting catalysis. Correct identification of the
ion sites helps the modeling of electrostatic potential surfaces
(16) Halling, P. J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2004, 359, 1287–1297.
(17) Basu, S.; Rambo, R. P.; Strauss-Soukup, J.; Cate, J. H.; Ferre’-
D’Amare, A. R.; Strobel, S. A.; Doudna, J. A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998,
5, 986–992.
(18) Tereshko, V.; Wilds, C. J.; Minasov, G.; Prakash, P. T.; Maier, M. A.;
Howard, A.; Wawrzak, Z.; Manoharan, M.; Egli, M. Nucleic Acids
Res. 2001, 29, 1208–1215.
(19) Dauter, Z.; Dauter, M.; Rajashankar, R. J. Acta Crystallogr. 2000,
D56, 232–237.
(20) Korolev, S.; Dementieva, I.; Sanishvili, R.; Minor, W.; Otwinowski,
Z.; Joachimiak, A. Acta Crystallogr. 2001, D57, 1008–1012.
(21) Nagem, R. A. P.; Dauter, Z.; Polikarpov, I. Acta Crystallogr. 2001,
D57, 996–1002.
(22) Evans, G.; Bricogne, G. Acta Crystallogr. 2002, D58, 976–991.
(23) Schultz, D. A.; Friedman, A. M.; White, M. A.; Fox, R. O. Protein
Sci. 2005, 14, 2862–2870.
(24) Schmitke, J. L.; Stern, L. J.; Klibanov, A. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1997, 94, 4250–4255.
(25) Fitzpatrick, P. A.; Steinmetz, A. C.; Ringe, D.; Klibanov, A. M. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 8653–8657.
(26) Khmelnitsky, Y. L.; Welch, S. H.; Clark, D. S.; Dordick, J. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 19943, 116, 2647–2648.
The plot of 〈|∆Fanom|/σ∆Fanom〉 versus resolution for the Cs-ACN
model indicates a strong anomalous scattering signal across the
(27) Ru, M. T.; HiroKane, S. Y.; Lo, A. S.; Dordick, J. S.; Reimer, J. A.;
Clark, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1565–1571.
(28) Altreuter, D. H.; Dordick, J. S.; Clark, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 1871–1876.
(32) Petsko, G. A.; Tsernoglou, D. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 106, 453–456.
(33) Fernandes, J. F. A.; Halling, P. J. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18, 1455–
1457, 2002.
(34) Cianci, M.; Antonyuk, S.; Bliss, N.; Bailey, M. W.; Buffey, S. G.;
Cheung, K. C.; Clarke, J. A.; Derbyshire, G. E.; Ellis, M. J.; Enderby,
M. J.; Grant, A. F.; Holbourn, M. P.; Laundy, D.; Nave, C.; Ryder,
R.; Stephenson, P.; Helliwell, J. R.; Hasnain, S. S. J. Synchrotron.
Radiat. 2003, 12, 442–445.
(29) Eppler, R. K.; Komor, R. S.; Huynh, J.; Dordick, J. S.; Reimer, J. A.;
Clark, D. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 5706–5710.
(30) Eppler, R. K.; Hudson, E. P.; Chase, S. D.; Dordick, J. S.; Reimer,
J. A.; Clark, D. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105 (41), 15672–
15677.
(31) Serdakowski, A. L.; Dordick, J. S. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26 (1),
48–54.
9
2294 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 7, 2010