J. D. Neighbors et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 516–519
519
1)
n
-BuLi, -78 o
C
C
Supplementary data
2) CuCN, -65 o
OCH3
O
Br
OCH3
MOMO
Experimental procedures and/or spectral data for com-
pounds 15–20, 23–28, and 31–33 are available. Supplemen-
tary data associated with this article can be found, in the
33
MOMO
Br
O
67%
OTBS
OTBS
27
23
OCH3
References and notes
O
4
schweinfurthin F
10 3-deoxyschweinfurthin B
1. Beutler, J. A.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Johnson, T.; Boyd, M. R. J. Nat.
Prod. 1998, 61, 1509–1512.
HO
H
21
OH
2. Beutler, J. A.; Jato, J.; Cragg, G. M.; Boyd, M. R. Nat. Prod. Lett.
2000, 14, 399–404.
Scheme 4. Coupling of metallated arene 23 and epoxybromide 33.
3. Yoder, B. J.; Cao, S. G.; Norris, A.; Miller, J. S.; Ratovoson, F.;
Razafitsalama, J.; Andriantsiferana, R.; Rasamison, V. E.; Kingston,
D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 342–346.
4. Paull, K. D.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Hodes, L.; Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.
A.; Rubinstein, L.; Plowman, J.; Boyd, M. R. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
1989, 81, 1088–1092.
literature +8.5 (c 0.01, CH3OH)). Treatment of alcohol
32 with methanesulfonyl chloride followed by lithium
bromide gave the known epoxybromide 33.
To our great delight subjection of the aryl bromide 23 to
halogen metal exchange conditions followed by transmetal-
lation with copper cyanide or copper bromide–dimethyl
sulfide complex, gave upon reaction with epoxybromide
33 the desired product 27 in 67% yield (Scheme 4). Epoxide
27 was converted to the aldehyde 7 through the sequence
shown in Scheme 2, and then converted to 3-deoxyschwein-
furthin B (10) via known methods.7 Analysis of the enan-
tiomeric excess of the final product by HPLC18 indicated
material of 94% ee confirming the stereocontrol of the cas-
cade process. This represents the removal of eight steps
from the first generation sequence leading to tricyclic left-
half diol 21, leaving the complete route from vanillin to
aldehyde 7 with a total of just eight steps in the longest
linear sequence and 23% overall yield.
Use of a Shi epoxidation and new protecting group tac-
tics in this second generation synthesis of the hexahydro-
xanthene substructure of schweinfurthin F and 3dSB has
dramatically improved access to this series of agents. This
should allow synthesis of sufficient quantities of 3dSB to
initiate in vivo investigations in mice. These efforts will
be the subject of future communications in this area.
5. Paull, K. D. Prediction of biochemical mechanism of action from the
in vitro antitumor screen of the National Cancer Institute. In Cancer
Chemotherapeutic Agents; Foye, W. O., Ed.; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1995; pp 9–45.
6. Neighbors, J. D.; Salnikova, M. S.; Beutler, J. A.; Wiemer, D. F.
Biorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 1771–1784.
7. Neighbors, J. D.; Beutler, J. A.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 925–931.
8. Treadwell, E. M.; Neighbors, J. D.; Wiemer, D. F. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
3639–3642.
9. Mente, N. R.; Wiemer, A. J.; Neighbors, J. D.; Beutler, J. A.;
Hohl, R. J.; Wiemer, D. F. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17,
911–915.
10. Wiemer, D. F.; Neighbors, J. D.; Beutler, J. A.; Preparation of
Schweinfurthin analogues, WO 2005092878, 2005, University of Iowa
Research Foundation, USA; Government of the United States of
America as Represented by the Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services: USA. p 76.
11. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M., 3rd ed. In Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New York, 1999; Vol. xxi, 779 p.
12. (a) Wang, Z. X.; Shi, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3099–3104; (b) Shu,
L.; Shi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8721–8724.
13. Garcia, M. A.; Meou, A.; Brun, P. Synlett 1996, 1049–1050.
14. Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Shieh, W. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
5995–5998.
15. Meier, H.; Uebelhart, P.; Eugster, C. H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1986, 69,
106–123.
16. Gansaeuer, A.; Justicia, J.; Rosales, A.; Rinker, B. Synlett 2005,
1954–1956.
Acknowledgments
17. Meou, A.; Garcia, M. A.; Brun, P. J. Mol. Cat. Chem. 1999, 138,
221–226.
Financial support from the Roy J. Carver Charitable
Trust, the Children’s Tumor Fund, the Breast Cancer
Research Program (DAMD17-01-1-0276 and DAMD17-
02-1-0423), an Oncology Research Training Award from
the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Institutional
National Research Service Award (2 T32 CA79445) and
the Predoctoral Training Program in the Pharmacological
Sciences (2 T32 GM067795), is gratefully acknowledged.
18. The HPLC analyses were performed on a Shimadzu LC-20AT
instrument with a Chiralcel OD-H column. The enantiomeric excess
of the epoxidation was determined by elution with a 99:1 mixture of
hexanes and 2-propanol. Retention times for the enantiomers of
epoxide 31 were 22.6 min (3.5%) and 24.7 min (96.5%), respectively.
For compound 10, the analysis was conducted with a solvent mixture
of 84:16 hexanes and 2-propanol, and retention times of 48.9 min
(2.9%) and 63.3 min (97.1%) were observed.