10.1002/ejoc.202000315
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
[1]
a) M. B. Smith, J. March, March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry 6th ed.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2007, 587-655. b) G. Brahmachari,
RCS Adv. 2016, 6, 64676. c) C. J. Li, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2023.
P. G. M. Wuts, T. W. Greene, Greene’s Protective groups in organic
synthesis 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2014.
a) M. K. Basu, S. Samajdar, F. F. Becker, B. K. Banik, Synlett 2002, 319.
b) B. Karimi, B. Golshani, Synthesis 2002, 784.
In Scheme 4, demonstration of synthetic utility of the 9,10-
phenanthrenedioxy acetal are shown. When 2 M HCl aqueous
solution was treated to a mixture of 9,10-phenanthrenedioxy
acetal 3d and ethylenglycol acetal 7 at room temperature in THF,
ethylenglycol acetal 7 was selectively deprotected and 9,10-
phenanthrenedioxy acetal was isolated in 84% yield. 3h
possesses two kinds of acid sensitive protective groups such as
tert-butyldimethylsilyl group and 9,10-phenanthrenedioxy acetal,
these protective groups are selectively removed by treatment
using tetrabutylammonium fluoride and CAN to afford phenol 8
and ketone 2h, respectively.
[2]
[3]
[4]
a) J. Grabowski, J. M. Granda, J. Jurczak, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16,
3114. b) J. Deutsch, A. Martin, H. Lieske, J. Catal. 2007, 245, 428. c) M.
Barbasiewicz, M. Maukosza, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3745.
[5]
a) C. Tortoreto, T. A. L. Egger, L. Guenee, J. Lacour, Org. Lett. 2016, 18,
240. b) M. E. Alonso, M. C. Garcia, A. W. Chitty, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
3445. c) Z. Yang, C. Lei, X. Zhao, R. Liu, H. Wei, Y. Ma, S. Meng, Q.
Cao, J. Wei, X. Wang, ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 9377. d) S. K. De, R. A.
Gibbs, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8141. e) A. Clerici, N. Pastori, O.
Porta, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 15679.
[6]
a) A. Dhakshinamoorthy, M. Alvaro, M. Puche, V. Fornes, H. Garcia,
ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 2026. b) M. X. Tan, L. Gu, N. Li, J. Y. Ying, Y.
Zhang, Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1127.
[7]
[8]
a) For review, see: D. I. A. Othman, M. Kitamura, Heterocycles 2016, 92,
1761.
Recent publication of our group, see: a) M. Kitamura, R. Sakata, T.
Okauchi, Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1931; b) M. Kitamura, M. Kisanuki,
R. Sakata, T. Okauchi. Chem. Lett. 2011, 40, 1129; c) M. Kitamura, M.
Kisanuki, T. Okauchi, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 905; d) M. Kitamura, K.
Kubo, S. Yoshinaga, Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 1653; e) M. Kitamura,
M. Kisanuki, K. Kanemura, T, Okauchi, Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1554; f) M.
Kitamura, S. Takahashi, T. Okauchi, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 8406; g) M.
Kitamura, K. Otsuka, S. Takahashi, T. Okauchi, Tetrahedron Lett. 2017,
58, 3508; h) D. I. A. Othman, K. Otsuka, S. Takahashi, K. B. Selim, M. A.
El-Sayed, A. S. Tantawy, T. Okauchi, M. Kitamura, Synlett 2018, 29, 457;
i) S. Takahashi, H. Shimooka, T. Okauchi, M. Kitamura, Chem. Lett. 2019,
48, 28. Recent reaction of diazonaphthoquinone by other groups, see: j)
K. Bahadur, S. Magar, Y. R. Lee, Org. Lett. 2013. 15. 4288; k) E. K. R.
Baral, Y. R. Lee, S. H. Kim, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2883; l) E. K.
R. Baral, Y. R. Lee, S. H. Kim, Y. J. Wee, Synthesis 2016, 48, 579; m) K.
B. Somai Magar, T. N. J. I. Edison, Y. R. Lee, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017,
7046; n) B. Ghosh, A. Biswas, S. Chakraborty, R. Samanta, Chem. -
Asian J. 2018, 13, 2388; o) H.-X. Wang, Q. Wan, K. Wu, K.-H. Low, C.
Yang, C.-Y. Zhou, J.-S. Huang, C.-M. Che, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141,
9027; p) H. -X. Wang, Y. Richard, Q. Wan, C. -Y. Zhou, C. -M. Che,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 1845.
Scheme 4. Demonstration of selective deprotection.
[9]
For reviews, see: a) M. P. Doyle, Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 919; b) A. Padwa,
K. E. Krumpe, Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 5385; c) T. Ye, M. A. McKervey,
Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1091; d) A. Padwa, D. J. Austin, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1797; e) M. P. Doyle, T. Ye, M. A. McKervey, in
Modern catalytic methods for organic synthesis with diazo compounds,
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998; f) H. M. L. Davies, R. E. J. Beckwith,
Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2861; g) Z. Zhang, J. Wang, Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 6577; h) M. P. Doyle, R. Duffy, M. Ratnikov, L. Zhou, Chem. Rev.
2010, 110, 704-724. i) A. Ford, H. Miel, A. Ring, C. N. Slattery, A. R.
Maguire, M. A. McKervey, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9981.
In conclusion, we developed the PdBr2-catalyzed acetal formation
reaction with diazophenanthrenequinone under non-acidic
conditions. The acetal that has a phenanthrene skeleton has good
stability against mild acidic reaction conditions and was
transformed to the corresponding carbonyl compound under
strong acidic or oxidation conditions using aqueous CAN.
[10] For a review, see: A. Padwa, S. F. Hornbuckle, Chem. Rev. 1991, 91,
263.
[11] a) M. Kitamura, N. Tashiro, R. Sakata, T. Okauchi, Synlett 2010, 2503;
b) M. Kitamura, R. Sakata, N. Tashiro, A. Ikegami, T. Okauchi, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 88, 824.
Acknowledgements
[12] J. E. Baldwin, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 734.
[13] 9,10-Phenanthrenequinone was formed as by-product in the
deprotection reaction.
This work was supported by a Grant in Aid for KAKENHI
(17K19125).
Keywords: acetal • diazo compounds • palladium • protective
group
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.