protection in organic synthesis has been successfully dem-
onstrated by the studies of organotrifluoroborates, which are
tolerable toward various reactions including oxidation, they
are still reactive in SMC.7 It seems likely that the develop-
ment of effective protective groups for boronyl groups in
SMC shall open up the new possibilities for the synthesis of
new organoboron compounds.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Monoprotected Benzenediboronic
Acid Derivatives
In this paper, we report benzenediboronic acid derivatives
of which boronyl groups are differentially protected as new
divalent cross-coupling modules for the convenient synthesis
of oligoarene derivatives (Scheme 1).8 The modules have
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Oligoarenes by Using Monoprotected
Benzenediboronic Acid Derivatives as Divalent Coupling
Modules
p- and o-derivatives, requiring the modified catalyst system
(Pd(dba)2/PCy3) to obtain a reasonable yield of m-2.
The monoprotected p-benzenediboronic acid derivative p-2
was subjected to SMC with p-bromotoluene under various
reaction conditions (Table 1). The reaction rate was greatly
two boronyl-derived substituents whose reactivities were
differentiated by the introduction of a temporary protective
group onto one of the two boron atoms. The temporary
protection of otherwise reactive boronyl groups was achieved
by 1,8-diaminonaphthalene, which we recently established
as a masking group for boronyl groups in iterative SMC.9-11
Our initial attempts at preparing the requisite monopro-
tected modules by simple condensation of benzenediboronic
acids with 1,8-diaminonaphthalene resulted in nonselective
formation of mixtures of monoprotected and diprotected
diboronic acids. We then turned our attention to use of
boronyl-protecteded haloarylboronic acid derivatives as start-
ing materials. Protected haloarylboronic acids p-, m-, and
o-1 were subjected to palladium-catalyzed borylation with
bis(pinacolato)diboron (Scheme 2).12 Reactions of p- and o-1
proceeded in the presence of PdCl2(dppf) in DMSO, giving
benzenediboronic acid derivatives p- and o-2, respectively,
whose boron atoms are unsymmetrically substituted with 1,8-
diaminonaphthalene and pinacol. On the other hand, m-1
showed an apparently lower reactivity than the corresponding
Table 1. Optimization of Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling Reaction
Conditionsa
entry
X
catalyst
base
KF
CsF
% yieldb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Br Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Br Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Br Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Br Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Br Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Br Pd(OAc)2/PPh3 (1/2)
Br Pd(OAc)2/dppf (1/1)
37
51
Na2CO3 58
K3PO4
NaOH
NaOH
NaOH
NaOH
NaOH
97
99 (99)
99
99
8c Cl
9c Cl
10
Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2
Pd(OAc)2/PPh3 (1/2)
92 (90)
N.R.
(94)
OTf Pd(OAc)2/(2-biphenyl)PCy2 (1/2) NaOH
a A mixture of aryl halide (0.14 mmol), p-2 (0.14 mmol), a catalyst (2.7
µmol), and base (0.41 mmol) was stirred at 60 °C for 4 h. b NMR yield.
Isolated yield in the parentheses. c 3 mol % of catalyst at 80 °C for 24 h.
(6) (a) Beletskaya, I.; Moberg, C. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3435. (b)
Ishiyama, T.; Nishijima, K.-i.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 7219. (c) Marder, T. B.; Norman, N. C. Top. Catal. 1998, 5,
63. (d) Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 611, 392.
(7) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275.
(8) (a) Tour, J. M. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 537. (b) Berresheim, A. J.;
Mu¨ller, M.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1747. (c) Segura, J. L.; Martin,
N. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 2403.
influenced by bases: K3PO4 and NaOH were found to be
most effective in promoting the reaction in dioxane/H2O in
the presence of Pd[P(t-Bu)3]2 as a catalyst, whereas KF, CsF,
and Na2CO3 resulted in a slower reaction at 60 °C. After
prolonged reaction time (18 h), however, almost quantitative
yields were attained even with the less effective bases (entries
1-5). It should be noted that the 1,8-diaminonaphthalene
protective group was found to be perfectly tolerable toward
strong bases in the presence of water.9 The high tolerance
toward bases is characteristic of the 1,8-diaminonaphthalene
(9) Noguchi, H.; Hojo, K.; Suginome, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
758.
(10) Gillis, E. P.; Burke, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6716.
(11) (a) Liess, P.; Hensel, V.; Schlu¨ter, A.-D. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1037.
(b) Blake, A. J.; Cooke, P. A.; Doyle, K. J.; Gair, S.; Simpkins, N. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9093. (c) Read, M. W.; Escobedo, J. O.; Willis,
D. M.; Beck, P. A.; Strongin, R. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3201. (d) Spivey,
A. C.; Turner, D. J.; Turner, M. L.; Yeates, S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1899. (e)
Ishikawa, S.; Manabe, K. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 164.
(12) (a) Ishiyama, T.; Murata, M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
7508. (b) Ishiyama, T.; Ishida, K.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9813.
378
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008