Kurahashi et al.
Discussion
level as the excited-state doublet. Thus, one-electron oxida-
tion of the Mn center in MnIII(salen) changes the sign of the
D value from negative to positive, while the D value remains
negative upon one-electron oxidation of the phenolate in
MnIII(salen). But such correlations might be limited to the
present system, because signs and magnitudes of D are
dependent on coordination environments.8d,11a,24d,e EPR is
also a sensitive probe for the fifth external ligand, and E/D
values vary depending on Cl (∼0.20), OH (∼0.20), OMe
(∼0.07), and dO (∼0.05) as an external fifth ligand.
Interestingly, this trend is completely parallel to the UV–vis
absorption shifts in the phenolate-to-MnIV charge-transfer
band. The previous resonance Raman study showed that the
C-O stretching of the phenoxyl radical (Y7a′) appeared at
different positions depending on metal ions even in the same
ligand system, and this was attributed to different extents of
double-bond character of the phenoxyl radical C-O bond,
which are influenced by metal ions.26 Interestingly, in the
case of phenoxyl radicals from Mn(salen) and Fe(salen), Y7a′
bands are observed at exactly the same position (1485 cm-1),
which may indicate that the natures of phenoxyl radicals from
MnIII(salen) and FeIII(salen) are exactly the same, irrespective
of different redox potentials and Lewis acidities of Mn
and Fe.
In light of the present spectroscopic data, some previous
observations might be worth re-examining. One is a report
that describes two crystallographically characterized mono-
nuclear Mn complexes with tridentate ONO coordination,
which were assigned as MnIV-phenolate.27 Quite interest-
ingly, the CH2Cl2 solutions of these show absorptions at 640
nm (ε ) 1945 M-1 cm-1)/890 nm (ε ) 1090 M-1 cm-1)
and 640 nm (ε ) 3850 M-1 cm-1)/970 nm (ε ) 900
M-1cm-1), respectively. The absorptions at 640 nm are
consistent with MnIV-phenolate, but the absorptions at 890
and 970 nm rather suggest the MnIII-phenoxyl radical. This
might indicate that the reported system contains an equilib-
rium between MnIV-phenolate and the MnIII-phenoxyl radical
in solution. Another example is a paper that reports a high-
valent Mn(salen) species from Jacobsen’s catalyst.8e Reaction
of Jacobsen’s catalyst with m-CPBA generates a transient
intermediate with absorption at 684 nm (ε ) 4000 M-1
cm-1). This transient intermediate was assumed to be
MnIV(salen+•) with the 684 nm absorption assigned as a salen
ligand radical. However, the present study casts doubt on their
Spectroscopic Features of MnIV-Phenolate versus
MnIII-Phenoxyl Radical. Absorption features in the visible
region could be a fingerprint to distinguish between MnIV-
phenolate and MnIII-phenoxyl radical formulations. MnIV-
phenolate, Cl-MnIV(salen), shows an intense absorption at
730 nm (ε ) 6022 M-1 cm-1), which could be assigned to
the phenolate-to-MnIV charge-transfer band. The phenolate-
to-MnIV charge-transfer band is shifted to higher energy upon
replacement of the fifth ligand from Cl (730 nm) to OH (720
nm), OMe (600 nm),23 and dO (<600 nm). Consistent with
our observation, MnIV complexes containing phenolate
groups are reported to show intense absorption (ε )
2000–6000 M-1 cm-1) in the range of 500–650 nm.24 On
the other hand, the MnIII-phenoxyl radical, H2O-
MnIII(salen+•), exhibits a broad absorption at 905 nm (ε )
7000 M-1 cm-1). By analogy to our previous result on
Fe(salen),7 further one-electron oxidation of H2O-MnIII-
(salen+•) may most probably generate a MnIII-diphenoxyl
radical, H2O-MnIII(salen2+••), which shows an absorption
of doubled intensity at 980 nm. According to the recent
experimental and theoretical studies on metal-organic radical
complexes by Wieghardt and Neese,25 these absorptions at
905 and 980 nm are most likely assigned to intervalence
charge transfer between the phenolate and the phenoxyl
radical and ligand-to-ligand charge transfer between the
phenoxyl radicals for H2O-MnIII(salen+•) and H2O-
MnIII(salen2+••), respectively. But the only example of the
MnIII-phenoxyl radical complex from the monophenolate
complex also shows an absorption maximum at 1015 nm (ε
) 1800 M-1 cm-1),11a and thus a metal-to-ligand charge
transfer assignment may not be completely ruled out for the
905 nm band in the present case. Variable-temperature EPR
could differentiate between MnIV-phenolate and the MnIII-
phenoxyl radical from the present MnIII(salen). Temperature
dependence of EPR signals from all of the MnIV(salen)’s
investigated herein shows that transitions between the ms )
(1/2 levels are the lowest energy levels, thus indicative of
positive D values. In contrast, H2O-MnIII(salen+•) exhibits
EPR signals, which arise from transitions from both the ms
) (1/2 and Ms ) (3/2 levels, and their temperature
dependence reveals a negative D value because of the Ms )
(3/2 level as the ground Kramers doublet and the ms ) (1/2
(23) MeO-MnIV(salen) was prepared by addition of 1 equiv of NaOMe
in MeOH to H2O-MnII.I (salen+•) in CH2Cl2 at 203 K. The electronic
structure was confirmed by UV-vis, EPR, 2H NMR, and ESI-MS
spectroscopy (Figure S10).
(25) (a) Herebian, D.; Bothe, E.; Neese, F.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9116–9128. (b) Herebian, D.;
Wieghardt, K. E.; Neese, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10997–
11005. (c) Blanchard, S.; Neese, F.; Bothe, E.; Bill, E.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3636–3656. (d) Ray, K.;
Begum, A.; Weyhermüller, T.; Piligkos, S.; van Slageren, J.; Neese,
F.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4403–4415. (e) Ray,
K.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2005,
44, 5345–5360. (f) Chlopek, K.; Bothe, E.; Neese, F.; Weyhermüller,
T.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 6298–6307. (g) Kokatam,
S.; Ray, K.; Pap, J.; Bill, E.; Geiger, W. E.; LeSuer, R. J.; Rieger,
P. H.; Weyhermüller, T.; Neese, F.; Wieghardt, K. Inorg. Chem. 2007,
46, 1100–1111.
(24) (a) Matsushita, T.; Hirata, Y.; Shono, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982,
55, 108–112. (b) Okawa, H.; Nakamura, M.; Kida, S. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 466–470. (c) Chin, D.-H.; Saywer, D. T.; Schaefer,
W. P.; Simmons, C. J. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 752–758. (d) Hartman,
J. R.; Foxman, B. M.; Cooper, S. R. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 1381–
1387. (e) Lynch, M. W.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Fitzgerald, B. J.;
Pierpont, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2041–2049. (f) Tirant,
M.; Smith, T. D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 121, 5–11. (g) Kessissoglou,
D. P.; Li, X.; Butler, W. M.; Pecoraro, V. L. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26,
2487–2492. (h) Chandra, S. K.; Basu, P.; Ray, D.; Pal, S.; Chakravorty,
A. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2423–2428. (i) Mikuriya, M.; Jie, D.;
Kakuta, Y.; Tokii, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 1132–1139. (j)
Adam, B.; Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Goerdt, B.; Haselhorst, G.; Hildenbrand,
K.; Sokolowski, A.; Steenken, S.; Weyhermüller, T.; Wieghardt, K.
Chem.—Eur. J. 1997, 3, 308–319.
(26) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2165–2175.
(27) Dutta, S.; Basu, P.; Chakravorty, A. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 4031–
4037.
(28) Green, M. T.; Dawson, J. H.; Gray, H. B. Science 2004, 304, 1653–
1656.
1682 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2008