C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
distance of 1.868 Å is similar to that obtained in previous studies
of C-H activation by σ-bond metathesis.20 The role of the metal
and the formation of the Ru-C are critical in favoring the otherwise
unexpected deprotonation of a phenyl group by a relatively weak
base.
The above results show that more aryl and heterocyclic C-H
bond functionalizations should be possible with catalysts offering,
via metal/base cooperative proton abstraction, an easy initial
orthometalation path.
Supporting Information Available: Computational details, Car-
tesian coordinates, and absolute energies for all computed structures.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
Figure 2. B3LYP-optimized structures for complexes 3t-a, 4t-a, and 5t-
a. Selected distances are indicated in Å.
References
(1) (a) Hassan, J.; Se´vignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, E.; Lemaire, M. Chem.
ReV. 2002, 102, 1359. (b) Littke, A.; Fu, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 4176. (c) Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; De
Meijere, A., Diederich, F. Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
(2) (a) Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. Nature 2002, 417, 507. (b) Go¨ttker-
Schnetmann, I.; White, P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1804. (c) Lersch, M.; Tilset, M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2471. (d)
Wiedemann, S. H.; Lewis, J. C.; Ellman, J. A.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2452.
Scheme 1. Possible Orthometalation Intermediates
(3) Ritleng, V.; Sirlin, C.; Pfeffer, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1731.
(4) Kakiuchi, F.; Murai, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 826.
(5) (a) Handbook of C-H Transformations; Dyker, G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2005. (b) Chatani, N. Directed Metallation. In Topics
in Organometallic Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, 2007.
(6) Alberico, D.; Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 174.
(7) (a) Terao, Y.; Kametani, Y.; Wakui, H.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura,
M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5967. (b) Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Chem. Lett.
2007, 36, 200. (c) Campeau, L. C.; Parisien, M.; Jean, A.; Fagnou, K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 581. (d) Gottumukkala, A. L.; Doucet, H.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 3626. (e) Gu¨rbu¨z, N.; Oˆ zdemir, I.; Cetinkaya,
B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2273. (f) Chiong, H. A.; Pham, Q.-N.;
Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9879. (g) Hull, K. L.; Lanni,
E. L.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14047 and references
cited therein.
(8) (a) Oi, S.; Fukita, S.; Inoue, Y. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2439. (b) Bedford,
R. B.; Limmert, M. E. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8669. (c) Ueura, K.; Satoh,
T.; Miura, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2229. (d) Lewis, J. C.; Wu, J. Y.;
Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1589
and references therein.
(9) (a) Martinez, R.; Chevalier, R.; Darses, S.; Genet, J. P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8232. (b) Ueno, S.; Chatani, N.; Kakiuchi, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6098.
(10) (a) Oi, S.; Fukita, S.; Hirata, N.; Watanuki, N.; Miyano, S.; Inoue, Y.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2579. (b) Oi, S.; Ogino, Y.; Fukita, S.; Inoue, Y. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 1783. (c) Oi, S.; Sakai, K.; Inoue, Y. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
4009. (d) Oi, S.; Aizawa, E.; Ogino, Y.; Inoue, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 3113. (e) Oi, S.; Tanaka, Y. S.; Inoue, Y. Organometallics 2006, 25,
4773. (f) Ackermann, L.; Born, R.; AÄ lvarez Bercedo, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6364.
(11) (a) Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3123. (b) Ackermann, L. Synthesis
2006, 10, 1557. (c) Ackermann, L.; Althammer, A.; Born, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2619. One N-aryl NHC-Ru catalyst led to 42%
of diarylated product (10a).
(12) Ackermann, L.; Althammer, A.; Born, R. Synlett 2007, 2833-2836.
(13) Fernandez, S.; Pfeffer, M.; Ritleng, V.; Sirlin, C. Organometallics 1999,
18, 2390.
(14) Cetinkaya, B.; Demir, S.; Ozdemir, I.; Semeril, D.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf,
P. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2323.
(15) Demerseman, B.; Mbaye, D. M.; Se´meril, D.; Toupet, L.; Bruneau, C.;
Dixneuf, P. H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1174.
(16) (a) Garc´ıa-Cuadrado, D.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras, F.; Echavarren, A.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1066. (b) Garc´ıa-Cuadrado, D.; de
Mendoza, P.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras, F.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6880.
(17) (a) Lafrance, M.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16496. (b)
Lafrance, M.; Rowley, C. N.; Woo, T. K.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 8754. (c) Davies, D. L; Donald, S. M. A.; Al-Duaij, O.;
Macgregor, S. A.; Polleth, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4210.
(18) B3LYP calculations with the Gaussian03 program, and a valence double-ú
plus polarization basis set. See Supporting Information for computational
details.
(19) Only one NHC was considered in order to have an empty coordination
site on the metal. Hydrogencarbonate, in principle, present together in
solution with carbonate, was used as the weak basicity alternative.
(20) (a) Oxgaard, J.; Muller, R. P.; Goddard, W. A.; Periana, R. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 352. (b) Cundari, T. R.; Grimes, T. V.; Gunnoe,
T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13172.
electron-withdrawing ones leading to 6 and 7. This absence of
discrimination by various arylbromides does not support an arene
electrophilic substitution process.
In contrast, as 2-pyridylbenzene with [RuCl2(arene)]2 easily leads
to orthometalation,13 a plausible mechanism via an initial ortho-
metalation-like process is presented in Scheme 1 (L ) NHC). The
intermediate II is expected to undergo PhBr reversible oxidative
addition to give III, that is able to release the arylation product 2
by reductive elimination. The less intuitive aspect is the critical
cleavage of the C-H bond. In principle, two mechanisms can be
postulated, the C-H oxidative addition producing a Ru(IV)
intermediate with a hydride ligand, or a direct proton abstraction16,17
from the phenyl by the base. We studied the process computation-
ally through DFT calculations18 on the system [Ru(IMe)(Cl)2(2-
pyridylbenzene)] (1t) (IMe ) N,N′-dimethylimidazolylidene),
- 19
corresponding to I, plus HCO3
.
The system 1t has several
isomers, all of them producing similar energy profiles. Only the
most stable one, labeled 1t-a, will be discussed here, and the
optimized structures for the other isomers are collected in the
Supporting Information.
Complex 1t-a presents an important agostic distortion, with an
ortho C-H distance of 1.179 Å. However, oxidative addition from
this species is disfavored, and the associated octahedral complex
with a hydride ligand 2t-a has a relative energy of 28.2 kcal/mol,
quite high above 1t-a. Both complexes are shown in the Supporting
Information. In contrast, the proton abstraction mechanism is much
-
easier. The introduction of HCO3 in the system results in its
coordination to ruthenium and the formation of an adduct, 3t-a,
22.9 kcal/mol below the separated fragments. This adduct evolves
to product 5t-a, with a Ru-phenyl bond, through transition state
4t-a. The transformation from 3t-a to 5t-a is exothermic by 13.7
kcal/mol, and the barrier is 13.9 kcal/mol. This low barrier indicates
a strong preference for the proton abstraction mechanism, even
-
when considering the weak HCO3 base.
The structures for species 3t-a, 4t-a, and 5t-a are shown in Figure
2. It is worth noticing that the hydrogen atom being transferred is
practically halfway between carbon (C-H distance, 1.383 Å) and
oxygen (O-H distance, 1.316 Å) in the transition state. In contrast,
the Ru-C bond is almost formed in the transition state 4t-a: the
Ru-C distance is 2.182 Å, whereas it is 2.009 Å in 5t-a. The Ru-H
JA710276X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 4, 2008 1157