The pathway of the synthesis of the acetates 13 and 14,
which served as precursors of the products of cyclization,
Z,Z-sulfide 7 and E,E-sulfide 8, is outlined in Scheme 1.
1,7-Octadiyne (9) was transformed in 28% yield to diol 10
by deprotonation and reaction with ethylene oxide. Diol 10
was divergently advanced to both Z,Z-diene 11 and E,E-
diene 12 in good yield by Lindlar reduction and reduction
with LiAlH4, respectively. The Lindlar reduction of 10
formed a 9:1 mixture of desired Z,Z-diene 11 and overre-
duced products. Fortunately, purification of the Z,Z-product
could be effected by chromatography with AgNO3 impreg-
nated silica gel after monotosylation8 of 11.
The 13-membered ring-containing products 7 and 8 were
prepared by treatment of the acetoxy tosylates 13 and 14
with NaOMe in 1:1 THF-MeOH. The stereochemistry of
the olefinic linkages in the Z,Z- and E,E-series was confirmed
1
by H NMR spectroscopy. The yields of 7 and 8 were
Still another factor that should be consequential is the
number of bond rotations required to access the cyclic
transition state from any particular conformation of the
starting compound. That number decreases with an increasing
number of non-rotatable (e.g., endocyclic, double, or triple)
bonds in the path of atoms that separates the reactive terminii.
Thus, it is easy to understand why the macrolactones 1-3
(10-, 13-, and 20-membered rings, respectively) can be
produced rapidly and in high yield by lactonization of the
corresponding hydroxy acids.5 There are numerous other
cases of the facilitation of cyclization reactions by decreasing
the flexibility of the chain undergoing ring closure.6
concentration dependent (especially for the E,E-case) because
of the formation of dimeric bis-sulfide byproduct (15) at
higher concentrations.
The rates of cyclization of the Z,Z- and E,E-sodium
thiolates 5 and 6 were determined at low concentration by
1H NMR. Specifically, the acetates were treated with
NaOCD3 in 1:1 THF-d8-CD3OD under Ar, which caused
rapid cleavage of the S-acetyl bond to form the sodium
thiolate 5 or 6, a reaction that is very fast even at -30 °C
1
(from H NMR studies), and then the rates of cyclization
were followed by observing the development of peaks
characteristic of product (7 or 8) at 30.0 °C, specifically the
methylene protons at C(7) and C(8) of 7 and 8 (Scheme 1).
At concentrations below 0.01 M, the cyclization reactions
were kinetically first order to a good approximation, and the
following values of the first-order rate constant, k1 (30.0 °C),
were extracted from the data: 0.0291 ( 1 × 10-4 min-1 for
the Z,Z-substrate 5, and 0.0038 ( 1 × 10-4 min-1 for the
E,E-substrate 6 at 0.005 M substrate concentration. From
this result, a ratio of relative rates of cyclization of the Z,Z-
sodium thiolate 5 and the E,E-sodium thiolate 6 of ap-
proximately 7.7 follows. Consistent with this difference in
rates of ring closure is the markedly greater tendency for
concentration-dependent formation of the dimeric product
all-E, bis-sulfide 15 which possesses a 26-membered ring.
We believe that the faster rate of 13-membered ring
formation for the Z,Z-sodium thiolate 5 as compared with
the E,E-sodium thiolate 6 is the resultant of at least three
identifiable factors. First, assuming a linear transition state
One starting point for the present study was the finding
that cis-14,15-epoxide of arachidonic acid (4) could be
formed selectively and easily by intramolecular oxygen-
transfer reaction of peroxyarachidonic acid.7 A second
stimulus was the discovery that selective intramolecular
oxygen-transfer reactions of polyunsaturated peroxyacids
containing E-olefinic linkages is considerably less favorable
than the case of the all-Z tetraenoic acid arachidonic acid
(B. Liau, unpublished work). We decided to study this effect
quantitatively by measuring the rates of cyclization by SN2
displacement of the Z,Z-substrate 5 and the E,E-substrate 6
under identical conditions.
for displacement, that is,
S--C-OTs ) 180 °, and an
S-C distance of ca. 2 Å the minimum number of bond
rotations required for generating the cyclic transition state
(5) Corey, E. J.; Nicolaou, K. C.; Melvin, L. S., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1975, 97, 653-654.
(6) For a review see Rousseau, G. Tetrahedron. 1955, 51, 2777-2849.
(7) Corey, E. J.; Niwa, H.; Falck, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1586-
1587.
(8) Bouzide, A.; Sauve´, G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2329-2332.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008
1056