Scheme 1. Catalytic Asymmetric 1,4-Addition of Glycine
Schiff Bases (2) to R,â-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds (1)
Table 1. Asymmetric 1,4-Addition of 2 to Methyl Crotonate
(1a) in the Presence of a Chiral Ca Complexa
entry
2
additive (10 mol %) yield (%)
3/4
ee(3/4) (%)
1b 2a
quant
<1/>99
58/42
11/89
8/92
44/56
68/32
56/46
18/82
-/99
0/82
2
3
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2b
2c
2d
(CF3)2CHOH
phenol
8a
8b
8c
85
90
46
71
89
78
90
N.P.
95
97
-/95
-/94
19/77
20/68
23/87
96/98
4
5
6
7
8d
8
9
10
>99/<1
>99/<1
72/-
99/-
11c 2d
a All reactions were performed in THF at -30 °C for 12 h by using 1
(0.36 mmol) and 2 (0.30 mmol) in the presence of MS 4Å (100 mg) and a
chiral Ca complex prepared from Ca(OiPr)2 (0.030 mmol) and ligand 6
(0.030 mmol) unless otherwis noted. b The reaction time was 3 h. c Ligand
7 was used and the reaction temperature was -20 °C. 8a ) p-methox-
yphenol, 8b ) 2,6-dimethylphenol, 8c ) 2-phenylphenol, 8d ) 2-(2-
methoxyphenyl)phenol. N.P. ) no desired product.
esters, only 1,4-adducts were obtained, while pyrrolidine
derivatives were exclusively produced in the reactions with
crotonate derivatives. Careful examination of the reaction
mechanism suggested that the reaction might proceed via a
stepwise mechanism; that is, 1,4-addition of 2 to 1a provides
enolate 5, followed by protonation providing 3 or cyclization
giving 4. We envisioned that if enolate 5 prepared from
crotonate derivatives and glycine derivatives 2 were proto-
nated, 3-substituted glutamic acids might be obtained. Based
on this consideration, we started to investigate diastereo- and
enantioselective 1,4-addition of 2 to crotonate derivatives
using a calcium catalyst.
First, we examined a proton source to trap the enolate
intermediate 5 in the reaction of 1a with 2a using a chiral
calcium catalyst prepared from Ca(OiPr)2 and ligand 6. When
1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropyl alcohol was selected as a
proton source, the reaction proceeded in good yield but the
1,4-adduct was racemic (Table 1, entry 2). Phenol derivatives
were then tested as proton sources. When phenol or p-
methoxyphenol were employed, the [3 + 2] cycloaddition
proceeded predominantly (entries 3 and 4). However, the
1,4-addition product was obtained preferentially using bulkier
phenol derivatives albeit with low selectivities (entries 5-7).
Next, we employed glycine derivatives with modified imines
to probe supression of the intramolecular cycloaddition by
controlling its electrophilicity. When a glycine derivative
bearing a bis(p-methoxyphenyl)methylene group (2b) was
employed, the 1,4-addition product was obtained with high
enantioselectivity (entry 8) but still in low yield. To suppress
the intramolecular cyclization further, we conducted the
reaction using bis(methylthio)methylene-protected glycine
derivative (2c). However, the desired reaction did not proceed
at all (entry 9). We then planned to control the reaction
course by altering the steric properties of the substrates.
When a tert-butylphenylmethylene glycine derivative (2d)
was used,7 the desired 1,4-addition adduct was obtained
exclusively with good enantioselectivity (entry 10). Ad-
ditionally, the use of ligand 7 improved the selectivity, and
the desired 1,4-addition adduct was obtained exclusively with
excellent enantioselectivity (entry 11). Moreover, to our
delight, the product obtained was a single diastereoisomer;
notably diastero- and enantioselective 1,4-addition has been
attained.
We then investigate the substrate scope of this 1,4-addition
reaction, summarized in Table 2. In most cases, the reactions
proceeded smoothly to afford the desired glutamic acid
derivatives with excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities.
The reaction proceeded even in the presence of 2 mol %
catalyst loading (entry 2). Ethyl crotonate (1b) also worked
well; however, the selectivity was a little lower (entry 3).
Methyl or ethyl 2-pentenoate reacted with 2d smoothly, with
excellent yields and enantioselectivities (entries 4 and 5).
The reactivity of R,â-unsaturated esters with longer alkyl
chains was a little lower, and the reaction of 1e proceeded
slowly, but high selectivity was obtained (entry 6). Branched
substrate 1f also gave the corresponding product in moderate
yield with high ee (entry 7). The reaction of 1g, bearing a
benzyloxy group at the terminal position, gave the desired
product as a diastereomeric mixture in good yield. The ee
(5) Catalytic asymmetric 1,4-addition reactions: (a) Arai, S.; Takahashi,
F.; Tsuji, R.; Nishida, A. Heterocycles 2006, 67, 495. (b) Lygo, B.; Allbutt,
B.; Kirton, E. H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4461. (c) O’Donnell, M.
J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 506. (d) Ohshima, T.; Shibuguchi, T.; Fukuta,
Y.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7743. (e) Akiyama, T.; Hara, M.;
Fuchibe, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1734.
(f) Shibuguchi, T.; Fukuta, Y.; Akachi, Y.; Sekine, A.; Ohshima, T.;
Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9539. (g) Arai, S.; Tsuji, R.;
Nishida, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9535. (h) O’Donnell, M. J.; Delgado,
F. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6641. (i) Ishikawa, T.; Araki, Y.; Kumamoto, T.;
Seki, H.; Fukuda, K.; Isobe, T. Chem. Commun. 2001, 245. (j) Zhang, F.-
Y., Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1097. (k) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Xu,
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5347.
(7) (a) Duhamel, L.; Duhamel, P.; Fouquay, S.; Eddine, J. J.; Peschard,
O.; Plaquevent, J.-C.; Ravard, A.; Solliard, R.; Valonot, J.-Y.; Vincens, H.
Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 5495. (b) Duhamel, P.; Eddine, J. J.; Valonot, J.-Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2355.
(6) Saito, S.; Tsubogo, T.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
5364.
808
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 5, 2008