C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The pyridines activated by coordination to a LA10 would be
responsible for the oxidative addition of the C(2)-H bond to nickel-
(0) species A,11 a plausible initiation step of the present catalysis
(Scheme 2).12 Hydronickelation across the alkyne coordinating to
the nickel center in the direction avoiding a steric repulsion between
the bulkier R3 and the pyridyl group in B takes place to give C,
which upon reductive elimination affords 3 in the presence of zinc
LA catalysts (path A). The use of AlMe3, a stronger Lewis acid
than diorganozincs,10 or lower reaction temperature retards the
reductive elimination and/or promotes the second insertion of an
additional alkyne into either of the C-Ni bonds in C to give D or
E, resulting in the formation of dienylated product 4 upon reductive
elimination (path B).13 Another mechanistic scenario involving a
metallacycle formation14 (not shown) could be conceivable. Ex-
perimental and theoretical mechanistic analyses will be further
investigated in detail.
Table 2. Nickel-Lewis Acid Catalyzed Direct C-2 Alkenylation of
Pyridines
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the divergent direct C-2
alkenylation of pyridines by nickel-LA cooperative catalysis to
synthesize a wide variety of 2-alkenylated pyridines in chemo-,
regio-, and stereoselective manners under mild conditions. Develop-
ment of other C-H functionalizations by nickel-LA dual catalysis
is in progress in our laboratories.
Acknowledgment. We thank Professor James P. Stambuli for
proof reading the manuscript and helpful comments. This work has
been supported financially by a Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific
Research and that for Priority Areas “Chemistry of Concerto
Catalysis” from MEXT, The Sumitomo Foundation, and The
Uehara Memorial Foundation. K.S.K. acknowledges Honjo Inter-
national Scholarship Foundation for financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedures including spectroscopic and analytical data. This material is
References
(1) Smith, D. M. In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds; Coffey, S.,
Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1976; Vol. 4, Part F, pp 27-229.
(2) Kakiuchi, F.; Chatani, N. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1077.
(3) (a) Moore, E. J.; Pretzer, W. R.; O’Connell, T. J.; Harris, J.; LaBounty,
L.; Chou, L.; Grimmer, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5888. (b)
Murakami, M.; Hori, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4720. (c) Lewis, J.
C.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5332.
(d) Kawashima, T.; Takao, T.; Suzuki, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
11006.
a Isolated yields of isomerically pure products based on 2 as the limiting
reagent. b Determined by 1H NMR analysis of a crude product. c PMe(t-
Bu)2 was used as a ligand. d About 10% of 4 was also observed. e Si )
SiMe2t-Bu. f Isolated yields of a mixture of stereoisomers. g Ni(cod)2 (10
mol %), P(i-Pr)3 (40 mol %), and a LA catalyst (20 mol %) were used.
h About 5% of 3ea was also observed.
(4) (a) Jordan, R. F.; Taylor, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 778. (b)
Mukhopadhyay, S.; Rothenberg, G.; Gitis, D.; Baidossi, M.; Ponde, D.
E.; Sasson, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 1809.
(5) Grigg, R.; Savic, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5737.
(6) (a) Campeau, L.-C.; Rousseaux, S.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 18020. (b) Leclerc, J.-P.; Fagnou, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 7781. (c) Kanyiva, K. S.; Nakao, Y.; Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 8872.
Scheme 2. Plausible Mechanism
(7) See Supporting Information for details.
(8) The mild reaction conditions of the present protocol could also be derived
from the higher reactivity of alkynes than that of alkenes.
(9) The E/Z ratio of 3ae was 80:20 at 0.7 h.
(10) Le´vy, G.; de Loth, P.; Gallais, F. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. C 1974,
278, 1405.
(11) (a) Ogoshi, S.; Ueta, M.; Oka, M.; Kurosawa, H. Chem. Commun. 2004,
2732. (b) Nakao, Y.; Kanyiva, K. S.; Oda, S.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8146. (c) Kanyiva, K. S.; Nakao, Y.; Hiyama, T.
Heterocycles 2007, 72, 677.
(12) C-H activation via carbene formation can not be ruled out; see: (a)
Esteruelas, M. A.; Ferna´ndez-Alvarez, F. J.; On˜ate, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 13044. (b) Alvarez, E.; Conejero, S.; Paneque, M.; Petronilho,
A.; Poveda, M. L.; Serrano, O.; Carmona, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 13060. (c) Alvarez, E.; Conejero, S.; Lara, P.; Lopez, J. A.; Paneque,
M.; Petronilho, A.; Poveda, M. L.; del Rio, D.; Serrano, O.; Carmona, E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14130.
(13) This contrasts the recent paper that notes the C-N bond reductive
elimination from pyridylpalladium amido complexes was accelerated by
the coordination of pyridyl nitrogen to LAs. See: (a) Shen, Q.; Hartwig,
J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7734. On the other hand, reductive
elimination of C-C bonds are reported to be slow with an electron-
withdrawing organic group; see: (b) Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F.
Organometallics 2004, 23, 3398.
(14) (a) Patel, S. J.; Jamison, T. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1364. (b)
Ogoshi, S.; Ikeda, H.; Kurosawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
4930.
substituent on the same side as the pyridyl group (entries 15 and
16), although silyl-substituted adduct 3ae isomerized under the
reaction conditions to give a stereoisomeric mixture.9 Terminal
alkynes were not applicable to this transformation due to rapid oligo-
and/or trimerization.
JA710766J
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 8, 2008 2449