SYNTHONS FOR SULFUR-HETEROCYCLIC α-AMINO ACIDS
445
Finally, the reaction of 1d (Thp-Pro-synthon) with thiobenzoic acid occurred
smoothly in THF at room temperature to give the endothiodipeptide 18, whereas the
reaction with protected α-amino acids such as Boc-Val-OH led to tripeptides, for example,
1912 (Scheme 7). It is important to note that 19 in the crystal adopts a conformation, which
is almost identical with a β-turn in spite of the fact that no stabilization by an intramolecular
hydrogen bond is possible. This may be explained by the presence of the α,α-disubstituted
α-amino acid in analogy to the effect of aminoisobutyric acid (Aib; see ref. [14]).
The coupling reaction of 1d with 4-bromobenzoic acid gave 20a, and subsequent
saponification of the ester group led to the corresponding dipeptide acid, which was again
reacted with 1d, yielding tetrapeptide ester 20b. Repetition of these two steps led to the
hexapeptide 20c in good yield (Scheme 7). It was shown by X-ray crystallography and 1H-
NMR studies that these highly congested oligopeptides also exist in a helical conformation
in the crystalline state as well as in solution.
CONCLUSIONS
The new sulfur-containing 2H-azirin-3-amines can be prepared conveniently and
have been shown to be useful building blocks for novel heterocyclic α,α-disubstituted α-
amino acids in the synthesis of conformationally restricted oligopeptides. On the basis of
the general reactivity of 2H-azirin-3-amines, they may also be used for the synthesis of
novel sulfur containing heterocycles.
REFERENCES
1. Rens, M.; Ghosez, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 3765–3768.
2. Heimgartner, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 238–264.
3. Ametamey, S. M.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 1314–1328.
4. Wipf, P.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1988, 71, 140–154; (b) Wipf, P.; Heimgartner,
H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 13–24.
5. Luykx, R.T. N.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 4093–4111; (b) Pradeille,
N.; Zerbe, O.; Mo¨hle, K.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Chem. Biodivers. 2005, 2, 1127–1152; (c)
Altherr, W.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 1144–1169; (d) Dannecker-
Do¨rig, I.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011, 94, 993–1011; (e) Stoykova, S.
A.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2012, 95, 1325–1351.
6. Lehmann, J.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8721–8736; (b) Lehmann,
J.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 5359–5376; (c) Breitenmoser, R. A.;
Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 786–796; (d) Budzowski, A.; Linden,
A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2008, 91, 1471–1488; (e) Ba¨rtsch, A.; Bischof, B.;
Heimgartner, H. Pol. J. Chem. 2009, 83, 195–206.
7. Dietliker, K.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983, 66, 262–295; (b) Stamm, S.; Heimgartner,
H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 1371–1396.
8. Wipf, P.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 354–368.
9. Villalgordo, J. M.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1992, 75, 1866–1871.
10. Stra¨ssler, C.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 1528–1554.
11. Ra¨ber, J. L.; Brun, K. A.; Heimgartner, H. Heterocycles 2007, 74, 397–409.
12. Stoykova, S. A.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H., in preparation.
13. Stra¨ssler, C.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H., unpublished results.
14. 14 Ramachandran, G. N.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Sasisekharan, V. J. Mol. Biol. 1963, 7, 95–99;
(b) Toniolo, C. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1980, 9, 1–44; (c) Toniolo, C.; Benedetti, E. Trends
Biochem. Sci. 1991, 16, 350–353.