10.1002/anie.202005324
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
This chiroptical sensing workflow was first tested with
samples containing the alcohol 6 in varying amounts and
enantiomeric ratios to quantitatively correlate the variation in the
corresponding chiroptical readouts to the change of the analyte
concentration and er. Having established the relay flow we then
attempted the comprehensive sensing analysis of several alcohol
mixtures. The samples were subsequently treated with the
chlorophosphite and the aniline probe and the resulting mixtures
containing 37 and 39 in varying quantities were then subjected to
CD/UV analysis, Table 2. The results prove that the optical relay
sensing concept is very reliable and generates accurate
concentration and er data. The analysis of a nonracemic solution
of 6 with an S:R ratio of 83.4:16.6 and a total concentration (both
enantiomers combined) of 6.0 mM gave 84.1:15.9 and 6.2 mM,
see entry 1.The sensing of other mixtures with vastly different
amounts and enantiomeric compositions was also successful and
we obtained relatively small error margins that are acceptable for
high-throughput screening purposes, entries 2-7. The recording
of CD and UV spectra can be accomplished simultaneously by
modern CD spectrophotometers which takes full advantage of the
inherent speed of the underlying reactions and the continuous
relay workflow. The reproducibility and robustness of this
approach were validated with samples containing similar amounts
of acetophenone, see SI. We like to point out that chirality sensing
with chlorophosphites is not restricted to one particular probe
scaffold although the general scope and usefulness were
evaluated in depth using 1 and 5. Overall, these proved equally
valuable. However, 1 is commercially available which is certainly
advantageous.
altogether underscores the value and practicality of the sensing
with 1-5 described herein, Scheme 3.
Scheme 3. Sensing of the enantiomers and a racemic mixture of alcohol 6 with
(P)-40. The reactions were conducted at 20.0 mM and the CD spectra were
collected at 0.20 mM in chloroform.
In summary, we have introduced a new class of chiroptical
probes and a relay assay sensing strategy that enable accurate
on-the-fly stereochemical analysis of mono-alcohols, diols,
hydroxy acids, amines and amino alcohols – a variety that stands
out among previously reported UV, fluorescence and CD assays.
The chlorophosphite CD probes 1-5 and several aniline derived
UV indicators were evaluated and the commercially available
chlorobenzodioxaphosphite and para-anisidine were combined
into a continuous sensing workflow. The practicality of this
approach and the accuracy of the chiroptical concentration and
enantiomeric ratio analysis were demonstrated with seven 1-
phenylethanol samples. It is envisioned that this assay can be
adapted to high-throughput equipment and multiwell plate
technology which would allow fully automated operation and
simultaneous screening of hundreds of samples in parallel.
Table 2. Simultaneous chiroptical sensing of the concentration, absolute
configuration and enantiomeric ratio of nonracemic samples of 6.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the U.S.
National Science Foundation (CHE-1764135).
Sample composition
Sensing results
Entry
Conc.
Abs.
Conc.a Abs.
(mM) config.b
er
erc
(mM) config.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6.0
S
S
R
S
R
S
S
83.4:16.6
85.0:15.0
6.2
9.9
S
S
R
S
R
S
S
84.1:15.9
82.9:17.1
22.3:77.7
67.5:32.5
34.1:65.9
61.8:38.2
96.9:3.1
Keywords: Optical sensing • chirality • circular dichroism • UV
spectroscopy • chlorophosphites
10.0
13.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
24.0
25.0:75.0 13.8
71.9:28.1 15.6
33.3:66.7 18.6
62.5:37.5 20.5
[1]
[2]
[3]
a) A. McNally, C. K. Prier, D. W. C. MacMillan, Science 2011, 334, 1114-
1117. b) A. B. Santanilla, E. L. Regalado, T. Pereira, M. Shevlin, K.
Bateman, L.-C. Campeau, J. Schneeweis, S. Berritt, Z. -C. Shi, P.
Nantermet, Y. Liu, R. Helmy, C. J. Welch, P. Vachal, I. W. Davies, T.
Cernak, S. D. Dreher, Science 2015, 347, 49-53. c) K. D. Collins, T.
Gensch, F. Glorius, Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 859-871.
97.9:2.1
22.5
For examples of fast chiral HPLC enantioseparations: a) D. Kotoni, A.
Ciogli, C. Molinaro, I. D’Acquarica, J. Kocergin, T. Szczerba, H. Ritchie,
C. Villani, F. Gasparrini, Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 6805-6813. (b) C. L.
Barhate, L. A. Joyce, A. A. Makarov, K. Zawatzky, F. Bernardoni, W. A.
Schafer, D. W. Armstrong, C. J. Welch, E. L. Regalado, Chem. Commun.
2017, 53, 509-512.
aBased on the UV change at 308 nm. bBased on the sign of the induced Cotton
effects. cThe er was calculated based on the CD amplitude measured at 273
nm. See SI for details.
Finally, we examined if one could use an atropisomeric
BINOL derived chlorophosphite probe for sensing, too. We
expected that (P)-40 would have a strong CD signal originating
from the BINOL moiety that may be selectively altered upon
binding of either (R)- or (S)-1-phenylethanol, 6, because
diastereomeric products 41 are formed. This would be
fundamentally different from the use of the CD-silent
chlorophosphites 1-5 which are achiral or tropos-type agents that
give enantiomeric products with the chiral target compounds 6-33
thus generating induced CD effects. Interestingly, we found that
sensing of enantiopure 6 and its racemate with (P)-40 yields
essentially the same CD spectrum and therefore does not allow
chiroptical enantiodifferentiation and ee determination which
For recent advances with NMR chiral solvating agents, see a) L. Yang,
T. Wenzel, R. T. Williamson, M. Christensen, W. Schafer, C. J. Welch,
ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 332-340. b) G. Storch, M. Haas, O. Trapp, Chem.
Eur. J. 2017, 23, 5414-5418. c) Q. H. Luu, K. G. Lewis, A. Banerjee, N.
Bhuvanesh, J. A. Gladysz, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 5087-5099 and
references therein.
[4]
[5]
a) D. Leung, S. O. Kang, E. V. Anslyn, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 448-
479. b) C. Wolf, K. W. Bentley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5408-5424.
For a recent Perspective on this topic: c) B. T. Herrera, S. L. Pilicer, E.
V. Anslyn, L. A. Joyce, C. Wolf, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10385-
10401.
a) S. H. Shabbir, J. R. Clinton, E. V. Anslyn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2009, 106, 10487-10492. b) S. Nieto, J. M. Dragna, E. V. Anslyn, Chem.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.