1552
H. He et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1546–1552
studied. The excitation spectrum of the flower-like
Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O sample consists of a strong absorption band
with a maximum at 402 nm and lots of weak bands monitoring
with 642 nm emission of Sm3+ (Fig. 11a). The room-temperature
emission spectrum of the flower-like Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O exhibits
the typical red-orange emissions at 561, 596, 640 and 703 nm
under 402 nm excitation, which are ascribed to the transitions 4G5/
electrons. This work may present a way for the morphology-
controlled synthesis of other inorganic materials.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Structure Research Laboratory
of CAS. We thank S.Q. Fu (University of Science and Technology of
China) for the helpful discussion.
6
6
6
4
6
2 ! H5/2
,
4G5/2 ! H7/2
,
4G5/2 ! H9/2 and G5/2 ! H11/2, respec-
tively (black line of Fig. 11b), while the Sm2O3 powder shows
obviously different PL spectral emission (red line of Fig. 11b). (For
interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the
reader is referred to the web version of the article.) The emission
spectrum of Sm2O3 displays a broad emission band in the
wavelength range from 550 to 705 nm. It is well known that the
energy level structure of 4f electrons is the key factor controlling
the PL spectrum of rare earth ions, while the energy level structure
depends on the crystal field [31]. The different PL spectral emission
may be firstly explained by the different crystal field of the
monoclinic Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O and cube Sm2O3. Secondly, the
crystal field, namely, the energy level structure of 4f electrons in
microcrystal specimen is also influenced by the defects and the
reconstruction of atomic arrangement on the surface. Besides
them, reabsorption effect has a certain influence on the emission,
which occurs as dips in the broad emission feature and makes PL
spectral emission of Sm2O3 more unconspicuous [32,33]. As
illustrated in Fig. 11c, the emission colour of the above samples
can be expressed by the CIE (Commission International de
I’Eclairage 1931 chromaticity) coordinates. The flower-like
Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O and Sm2O3 emit red-orange and violet light
and their chromaticity coordinates are x = 0.4905, y = 0.3792 and
x = 0.3943, y = 0.2609, respectively.
References
[1] A.P. Alivisatos, Science 271 (1996) 933–937.
[2] M. Bottrill, L.K. Nicholas, N.J. Long, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 557–571.
[3] M. Andruh, J.P. Costes, C. Diaz, S. Gao, Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 3342–3359.
[4] H.T. Ng, J. Li, M.K. Smith, P. Nguyen, A. Cassell, J. Han, M. Meyyappan, Science 300
(2003) 1249.
[5] D. Li, J.T. McCann, Y.N. Xia, Small 1 (2005) 83–86.
[6] R. Chi, Y. Hu, G. Zhu, S. Xu, Z. Zhou, Z. Xu, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 34 (2003) 611–
617.
[7] L. Muresan, E.J. Popovici, R. Grecu, L.B. Tudoran, J. Alloys Compd. 471 (2009) 421–
427.
[8] A. Elizebeth, V. Thomas, G. Jose, G. Jose, N.V. Unnikrishnan, C. Joseph, M.A.
Ittyachen, Cryst. Res. Technol. 39 (2004) 105–110.
[9] C. Joseph, M.A. Ittyachen, K.S. Raju, B. Mater, Science 20 (1997) 37–48.
[10] M.J. Lochhead, L. Touryan, V. Vogel, J. Phys. Chem. B 103 (1999) 3411–3416.
[11] A. Mohanu, C. Brouca-Cabarrecq, J.C. Trombe, J. Solid State Chem. 179 (2006) 3–
17.
[12] M.V. John, M.A. Ittyachen, Mater. Sci. B 21 (1998) 387–391.
[13] W.X. Que, C.H. Kam, Opt. Commun. 206 (2002) 211–216.
[14] R. Chi, Z. Xu, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 30 (1999) 189–195.
[15] T. Hirai, N. Okamoto, I. Komasawa, Langmuir 14 (1998) 6648–6653.
[16] G.A.M. Hussein, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 37 (1996) 111–149.
[17] C. Brouca-Cabarrecq, J.C. Trombe, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 39 (2009) 786–798.
[18] X.B. Yin, Y.J. Zhang, Z.Y. Fang, Z.Y. Xu, W. Zhu, H.M. He, Cryst. Res. Technol. 45
(2010) 961–964.
[19] Y. Uwamino, Y. Ishizuka, H. Yamatera, J. Electron. Spectrosc. 34 (1984) 67–78.
[20] G. Dufour, R.D. Karnatak, J.M. Mariot, C. Bonnelle, Chem. Phys. Lett. 42 (1976)
433–434.
[21] Y.J. Zhang, K.D. Han, T. Cheng, Z.Y. Fang, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 4713–4717.
[22] J. Fujita, A.E. Martell, K.J. Nakamoto, J. Chem. Phys. 36 (1962) 324–338.
[23] T.D. Nguyen, C.T. Dinh, T.O. Do, Langmuir 25 (2009) 11142–11148.
[24] I.P.A.B. Optrajanov, Spectrochim. Acta: Part A: Mol. Spectrosc. 31 (1975) 309–316.
[25] F. Luo, C.J. Jia, W. Song, L.P. You, C.H. Yan, Cryst. Growth Des. 5 (2005) 137–142.
[26] Z.H. Xu, X.J. Kang, C.X. Li, Z.Y. Hou, C.M. Zhang, D.M. Yang, G.G. Li, J. Lin, Inorg.
Chem. 49 (2010) 6706–6715.
[27] Z.Q. Li, Y. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (2006) 7732–7735.
[28] T. Moeller, D.F. Martin, L.R.C. Thompson, R. Ferros, G.R. Feistel, Chem. Rev. 65
(1965) 1–50.
[29] Y.J. Sun, Y. Chen, L.J. Tian, Y. Yu, X.G. Kong, J.W. Zhao, H. Zhang, Nanotechnology 18
(2007) 1–9.
[30] G. Jia, H.P. You, L.H. Zhang, Y.H. Zheng, K. Liu, Y.J. Huang, H.J. Zhang, Crysteng-
comm 11 (2009) 2745–2750.
[31] J.F. Martel, S. Jandl, B. Viana, D. Vivien, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61 (2000) 1455–1463.
[32] J.F. Martel, S. Jandl, A.M. Lejus, B. Viana, D. Vivien, J. Alloys Compd. 277 (1998)
353–355.
4. Conclusions
In summary, a convenient and facile complex agent assisted
precipitation method has been utilized for the preparation of
Ln(C2O4)3ꢀnH2O (Ln = Sm, Gd, Dy, Lu, Yb). The condition experi-
ment results show room temperature, 24 h and the molar ratio of
Na3Cit to Sm3+ of 1.2:1 are the preferable experiment parameters
to synthesize the flower-like Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O. Further
researches show that besides the reaction conditions and the
additive amount of the complex agent, the morphology of the
lanthanide oxalates is also determined by the rare earth ions. The
optical properties of Sm2(C2O4)3ꢀ10H2O and Sm2O3 samples are
distinct, which is relevant to Sm3+ energy level structure of 4f
[33] S. Mochizuki, Physica B 340 (2003) 944–948.