treating 19 at 50À60 °C with MeMgBr at rates of 1À2 mL/
min, effecting clean conversion to 19. Treatment with
TBSOTf, followed by chemoselective deprotection of
ÀOTES, afforded stereotetrad 11 on scales up to 4.5 g
(Scheme 2A). Similarly, alcohol 21 was converted to
stereotetrad 9 on scales up to 8 g (Scheme 2B).
aldehyde-ester 34 was quite troublesome since it was
exceptionally prone to air oxidation giving the carboxylic
acid. Fortunately, it was found that aldehyde-PMB ether 7
is inert to air oxidation. The aldehyde 7 was obtained in
four steps from vinyl sulfone 10 (Schemes 4 and 7).
Fragment 4, possessing the stereotetrad (C7ÀC10), can
be obtainedfrom cyclic vinyl sulfone 9. Similarly, fragment
8 with C23ÀC26 can be prepared from cyclic vinyl sulfone
11. Following our previous report, fragment 10 was chosen
to introduce the C15ÀC20 array 7. Notably, β-ketopho-
sphonate 6 was adopted for joining iodide 4 and aldehyde 7
as developed by Paterson and Calter.6b,6e
Scheme 4. Synthesis of C15ÀC20 Terminii-Differentiated Seg-
mentsa
The synthesis starts with vinyl sulfone 9 which was
converted to lactone 30 upon ozonolysis followed by
reductive workup (Scheme 3). After protection of the
primary alcohol in 30 as the silyl ether, the lactone was
converted to acyclic dimethylamide16 31 using a protocol
developed for making Weinreb amides.17 Interestingly,
synthesis of the specific methoxymethyl amide failed under
these conditions. Super-Hydride (LiBEt3H) reduction of
the dimethylamide yielded the primary alcohol18 in vir-
tually quantitative yield, which was subsequently converted
to iodide 4 (71% yield over three steps).
a Ozonolysis was performed in CH2Cl2/MeOH (4:1).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Iodide 4
The synthesis of C21ÀC27 intermediate 8 commences
with ozonolysis20 of 11 followed by reduction to afford
lactone-alcohol 35 (Scheme 5). DCAD Mitsunobu
coupling21 of 35 followed by lactone opening generated
Weinrebamide 37, which was transformed to alcohol 38via
the intermediate aldehyde. Initial attempts to protect the
alcohol with a benzyl group were unsuccessful due to the
TBS migration and TES deprotection. To circumvent these
difficulties, TIPS protection was adopted. Final m-CPBA
oxidation delivered the C21ÀC27 fragment sulfone 8.
With 8 and 32 in hand, JuliaÀKocienski olefination
(Scheme 6) was investigated to construct the C15ÀC27
subunit of aplyronine A. Low E/Z ratios were obtained,
using Li or KMHDS in THF (entries 1 and 3). Changing
the solvent to DME22 gave a better ratio (E/Z = 5.5:1)
(entry 2). Much to our delight, application of Jacobsen’s
solvent combination (DMF/HMPA)23 gave the best selec-
tivity (E/Z = 12:1) in a yield of 60%, 83% based upon
recovered starting material. Subsequent DIBAL reduction
afforded aldehyde 40 in 92% yield.
The synthesis of the C15ÀC20 target starts with known
vinyl sulfone 10 that underwent ozonolysis to give acyclic
ester-aldehyde 32 as the JuliaÀKocienski olefination sub-
strate (Schemes 4 and 6).8b
In 2007, our group reported a variant of the Taber
reaction,19 in which cyclic vinyl sulfone 10 was converted
to transposed vinyl phosphate 33 featuring a formal end-
for-end REDOX transposition. Treatment of 10 with the
sodium salt of diethylphosphite gave vinyl phosphonate 33
in 93% yield. Oxidative cleavage of 33 provided aldehyde-
ester 34 desired for the HornerÀWadsworthÀEmmons
(HWE) coupling step (Schemes 4 and 7). Handling
With compounds 4, 5, 6, and 7 in hand, attention was
directed to the C1ÀC20 segment synthesis (Scheme 7). The
(20) Ozonolysis was performed successfully in CH2Cl2 and in acet-
one, based on “the added aldehyde effect”. For ozonolysis in acetone,
see: (a) Su, J.; Murray, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 678. (b) Schiaffo,
C. E.; Dussault, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4688. (c) For stabilization
of carbonyl oxide with acetone, see Figure 4 in Supporting Information.
(21) Lipshutz, B. H.; Chung, D. W.; Rich, B.; Corral, R. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 5069.
(16) Occasionally, quenching with aqueous NH4Cl resulted in some
global elimination. See Figure 5 in Supporting Information for sug-
gested mechanism and characterization.
(17) Levin, J. I.;Turos, E.;Weinreb, S. M. Synth. Commun. 1982, 12, 989.
(18) Brown, H. C.; Kim, S. C.; Krishnamurthy, S. J. Org. Chem.
1980, 45, 1.
ꢀ
(22) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A.
Synlett 1998, 26.
(23) (a) Liu, P.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10772.
(b) Smith, A. B.; Dong, S.; Brenneman, J. B.; Fox, R. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 12109.
(19) Taber, D. F.; Saleh, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4817.
6344
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 24, 2011