130
P. B. Reddy et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2008, 341, 126–131
pounds synthesized, compound 10f, which contained a Synthesis of compound 10b
To a solution of 10a (2 mmol) in acetic anhydride (6 mL), pyri-
dimethoxy moiety on ring E and a glucose moiety on the
triazolyl ring, was found to be the most promising in this
study.
In Table 3, a list of QSAR parameters for the derivatives
is presented comparing them with the standard etopo-
side, a drug derived from podophyllotoxin itself. Similar
to etoposide, the molecular weight of each analogue gen-
erated by us exceeded the Lipinski limit (etoposide M.W.
588.56). The log P values of the derivatives ranged
between –0.78 to +1.87.
In conclusion, a series of novel 4b-[(4-substituted)-1,2,3-
triazol-1-yl]podophyllotoxin derivatives were synthesized
and screened for anticancer activity against a panel of six
human cancer cell lines. From the derived cytotoxicity
data it was found that all the compounds with a dime-
thoxy moiety on ring-E are having activity comparable
with that of the standard drug etoposide. It was observed
that compound 10f is most active among all the screened
compounds, and even more potent than etoposide
against the above studied cell lines.
dine (1.5 mL) was added and stirred at room temperature for 6 h.
After completion, water was added (40 mL) and extracted with
ethylacetate (2620 mL). The combined extracts were dried over
Na2SO4 and evaporated on rotary evaporator to give white solid
(95%).
25
Spectral data (10f): mp. 208–2108C; [a]D –36.86 (c = 0.8,
MeOH); IR (KBr): 1058, 1126, 1239, 1458, 1591, 1774, 2923,
1
3440 cm– 1; H-NMR (200 MHz, CD3OD): 3.19–3.36 (m, 8H, C11-
CH2b, C2-CH, C3-CH, C3999-CH, C4999-CH, C5999-CH, C6999-CH2), 3.65–3.79
(m, 8H, C11-CH2a, C2999-CH, C39-OCH3, C59-OCH3), 4.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
2H, C699-CH2O), 4.75–4.79 (m, 2H, C1999-CH, C1-CH), 5.98 (d, J =
4.3 Hz, 2H, OCH2O), 6.26 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H, C4-CH), 6.38 (s, 2H, C29-
CH, C69-CH), 6.65 (s, 1H, C8-CH), 6.68 (s, 1H, C5-CH), 7.83 (s, 1H, C599-
C=CH-N);13C-NMR (50 MHz, CD3OD): 38.58 (C-3), 44.80 (C-1), 45.21
(C-4), 56.82 (26OCH3), 59.93 (C-2), 63.07 (C-6999), 68.86 (C-699), 69.00
(C-11), 71.63 (C-4999), 75.00 (C-3999), 76.55 (C-5999), 78.10 (C-2999), 103.27
(-OCH2O-), 103.91 (C-1999), 109.35 (C-29, C-69), 111.25 (C-5, C-8),
124.36 (C-49), 126.12 (C-599), 133.41 (C-10), 135.63 (C-9), 136.57 (C-
19), 144.57 (C-6), 147.65 (C-499), 150.81 (C-7), 152.23 (C-39, C-5'),
173.26 (C-12); ESI MS [M + Na]+: 666.2; Anal. calcd. (C30H33N3O13):
C: 55.99, H: 5.17, N: 6.53; found C: 55.92, H: 5.11, N: 6.51; Anal.
calcd. (C30H33N3O13): C: 55.99, H: 5.17, N: 6.53; found C: 55.92, H:
5.11, N: 6.51.
Authors thank CSIR, New Delhi, for the award of fellowships to
the graduate students.
References
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
[1] K. H. Lee in The Human Medicinal Agents from Plants: Ameri-
can Chemical Society, Symposium Series (Ed: A. D. Kinghorn,
M. Balandrin), American Chemical Society, Washington,
DC, 1993, pp. 170–190; W. D. MacRae, J. B. Hudson, B. H.
Towers, Planta Med. 1989, 55, 531–535.
Experimental
Melting points were recorded on Bꢀchi Melting point apparatus
D-545 (Bꢀchi Labortechnik, Flawil, Switzerland); IR spectra (KBr
discs) were recorded on Bruker Vector 22 instrument (Bruker
Bioscience, Billerica, MA, USA). NMR spectra were recorded on
Bruker DPX instrument (Bruker) in CDCl3 with TMS as internal
standard for protons and solvent signals as internal standard for
carbon spectra. Chemical shift values are given in d (ppm) and
coupling constants are given in Hz. Mass spectra were recorded
on ESI-esquire 3000 Bruker Daltonics instrument (Bruker). The
progress of all reactions was monitored by TLC on 265 cm pre-
coated silica gel 60 F254 plates of thickness of 0.25 mm (Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany). The chromatograms were visualized
under UV 254–366 nm and iodine.
[2] I. Jardine in The Anticancer Agents based on Natural Product
Models” (Ed: J. M. Cassady, J. Douros), Academic Press,
New York, 1980, p. 319.
[3] H. Stahelin, Eur. J. Cancer 1973, 9, 215–221.
[4] H. Stahelin, Eur. J. Cancer 1970, 6, 303–311.
[5] B. F. Issell, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1982, 7, 73–80.
[6] R. M. Moraes, F. E. Dayan, C. Canel, Studies in Natural
Products Chemistry, 2002, 26, 149.
[7] W. Choy, Genelabs Technologies, personal communica-
tion.
[8] T. Terada, K. Fujimoto, M. Nomura, J. Yamashita, et al., J.
Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1689–1699.
General procedure
Synthesis of compounds 10a, 10c–10i
[9] T. Utsugi, J. Shibata, Y. Sugimoto, K. Aoyagi, et al., Cancer
Res. 1996, 56, 2809–2814.
To a solution of 9 (3 mmol) in t-butyl alcohol and water (1 : 2,
10 mL) was added CuSO465 H2O (3.0 mmol), sodium ascorbate
(15.0 mmol) followed by epipodophyllotoxin azide (3 mmol).
The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 8 h.
After completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with 30 mL
of water and extracted with ethylacetate (3620 mL). The com-
bined extracts were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and
evaporated on rotary evaporator. The crude product obtained
was crystallized in diethyl ether to yield the pure product.
[10] J. A. W. Byl, S. D. Cline, T. Utsugi, T. Kobunai, et al., Bio-
chemistry 2001, 40, 712–718.
[11] T. L. Macdonald, E. K. Lehenert, J. T. Loper, K. C. Chow, W.
E. Ross, “DNA Topoisomerase in Cancer”, Oxford University
Press, New York, 1991, p. 119.
[12] Z. Xiao, K. F. Bastow, J. R. Vance, K. H. Lee, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2004, 12, 3339–3344.
i 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim