metrically functionalized DBTFs were also prepared. The
structural, electronic, and redox properties of these com-
pounds were evaluated using X-ray crystallography, UV-
vis spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry, respectively.
Scheme 1. The Repeating Unit of the Polyenetetraamine
Shown Is Effectively a Derivative of Dibenzotetraazafulvalene
Various symmetrically and asymmetrically functionalized
DBTFs bearing electron-donating and -withdrawing groups13
are shown in Table 1. Symmetric DBTFs 1-4 were
synthesized using a two-step procedure. First, their respective
1-methylbenzimidazoles were alkylated with CH3I in CH3-
CN to afford the corresponding 1,3-dimethylbenzimidazo-
lium salts. These salts were then deprotonated with NaH,14
facilitated with a catalytic amount of KOtBu, in benzene to
generate the respective benzimidazolinylidenes in situ, which
ultimately dimerized to afford the desired DBTFs.15,16
To prepare an asymmetrically functionalized DBTF (i.e.,
a donor-acceptor analogue), a linker was required to ensure
proper registry. DBTF 5 was synthesized by first alkylating
5,6-dimethoxy-1-methyl-benzimidazole with excess 1,4-
dibromobutane in CH3CN. The resulting salt was then treated
with 4,5-dibromo-1-methylbenzimidazole to obtain the re-
spective bisbenzimidazolium salt. Subsequent deprotonation
using the protocol described above afforded the desired
asymmetric DBTF. To account for effects caused by the four-
carbon linker, tethered analogues 6 and 7 were synthesized
in a similar fashion17 and compared with their parent
compounds 2 and 3.
and as “super electron donor” reagents,10 less is known about
their structural and electronic properties.11 For example,
DBTF 1 (see Table 1) was reported12 to exhibit typical C-N
Table 1. Selected Structural Data of DBTFsa
no.
R
X
Y
CdCb (Å) CNCc (deg) τC)Cd (deg)
Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained for
2, 3, and 7 by slow diffusion of ether into saturated THF
solutions;18 ORTEP diagrams for 2 and 3 are shown in parts
A and B, respectively, of Figure 1.19 While the lengths of
the carbon-carbon double bonds were similar for each of
these compounds (see Table 1), comparison of 2 and 3
revealed that the geometries about the enetetraamine units
were strongly influenced by the pendant functional groups.
For example, the methoxy substituents in 2 appeared to
enhance N-pyramidalization (avg C-N-C angle ) 113°).
This structural arrangement effectively minimized steric
interactions between opposing N-methyl groups and afforded
a nearly planar enetetraamine moiety (abs torsion ) 7°).20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2H
H
H
1.344(4)
1.338(16)
1.348(8)
113
113
116
nd
nd
nd
14
7
2H
2H
2H
OMe OMe
Br
Cl
Br
Cl
27
nd
nd
nd
18
nd
nd
(CH2)2 OMe OMe nd
(CH2)2 Br Br 1.343(10)
(CH2)2 OMe Br
117
a See text for synthesis. b Average length of the carbon-carbon double
bond. c Average angle of the contiguous C-N-C systems. d Absolute
torsion angle about the enetetraamine. nd ) not determined.
lengths (∼1.43 Å) and a 14° torsion angle about the
enetetraamine unit; hence, electronic delocalization between
the arene rings appeared to be minimal in this compound.
The primary purpose of this study was to determine the
extent to which electronic communication occurs through
the enetetraamine linkage. In particular, the synthesis and
study of a donor-acceptor DBTF, featuring electron-
donating groups on one arene ring and electron-withdrawing
groups on the other, is described. For comparison, sym-
(13) 5-Nitro-1,3-dimethylbenzimidazolium bromide was found to de-
compose upon treatment with NaH/KOtBu.
(14) (a) Bourson, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1971, 3541. (b) Hu¨nig, S.;
Scheutzow, D.; Schlaf, H.; Quast, H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1972, 765, 110.
(15) Due to the extreme sensitivities of DBTFs toward O2 and/or H2O,
reaction mixtures were typically filtered through PTFE membranes to
remove residual inorganic salts and analyzed directly.
(16) Small amounts of free benzimidazolinylidenes were observed for
each of the DBTFs shown in Table 1. For an excellent, comprehensive
analysis of diaminocarbene dimerizations, see: Alder, R. W.; Blake, M.
E.; Chaker, L.; Harvey, J. N.; Paolini, F.; Schu¨tz, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 5896.
(17) For related syntheses, see: (a) Ames, J. R.; Houghtaling, M. A.;
Terrian, D. L.; Mitchell, T. A. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75, 28. (b) Taton, T.
A.; Chen, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1011. (c) Shi, Z.;
Thummel, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 16, 2741. (d) Thummel, R. P.;
Goulle, V.; Chen, B. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3057. (e) Hu¨nig, S.; Sheutzov,
D.; Schlaf, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1972, 765, 126.
(9) (a) Ku¨c¸u¨kbay, H.; C¸ etinkaya, E.; Cetinkaya, B.; Lappert, M. F. Synth.
Commun. 1997, 27, 4059. (b) Shi, Z.; Thummel, R. P. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 5935.
(10) (a) Schoenebeck, F.; Murphy, J. A.; Zhou, S.-Z.; Uenoyama, Y.;
Miclo, Y.; Tuttle, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13368. (b) Murphy, J.
A.; Zhou, S.-Z.; Thomson, D. W.; Schoenebeck, F.; Mohan, M.; Park, S.
R.; Tuttle, T.; Berlouis, L. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5178. (c)
Murphy, J. A.; Khan, T. A.; Zhou, S.-Z.; Thomson, D. W.; Mahesh, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1356.
(11) This is primarily due to their extreme sensitivities toward air and
water. As a result, very few X-ray structures of DTBFs are known.3b,5,12
(12) C¸ etinkaya, E.; Hitchcock, P. B.; Ku¨c¸u¨kbay, H.; Lappert, M. F.; Al-
Juaid, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1994, 481, 89.
(18) All attempts to grow quality crystals for 4-6 were unsuccessful.
(19) The structure of 7 was found to be superficially similar to 3; see
the Supporting Information.
(20) Low torsion (15°) and avg C-N-C (116°) angles were observed5
in a bibenzobisimidazolinylidene, another electron-rich DBTF.
5402
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 26, 2007