B. T. Shireman et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 2103–2108
2107
tion of the pyrimidine maintained high affinity for 5-
HT2A while improving selectivity versus the remaining
5-HT2 receptors. In order to further evaluate the appro-
priate placement of the basic nitrogen in a piperidine or
azepine ring, we examined the effect that positioning of
this nitrogen had on affinity and selectivity for the 5-
HT2A receptor, Table 2. Positioning the nitrogen in
the 8-position of the 2-alkyl-4-aryl-tetrahydro-pyrimi-
do-azepine (34a, 5-HT2A Ki = 8.8 nM) gave a high affin-
ity compound with excellent selectivity for 5-HT2B
(Ki = 1300 nM). Poor selectivity over the 5-HT2C
(Ki = 150 nM) was observed for this compound. The
corresponding piperidine analog 19a (5-HT2A
Ki = 9 nM) possessed similar affinity for 5-HT2A with re-
duced selectivity for the 5-HT2B (Ki = 310 nM) and 5-
HT2C (Ki = 75 nM) receptors. Azepine analog 36a (5-
HT2A Ki = 130 nM), with the nitrogen in 6-position of
the tetrahydroazepine, showed decreased affinity for
the 5-HT2A receptor.
ing of a basic nitrogen relative to the 2,4-substituted
pyrimidine core. In addition, selectivity was largely af-
fected by the presence of a 4-fluorophenyl moiety in
the pyrimidine 4-position. In summary we have identi-
fied a promising series of potent and selective 5-HT2A
antagonists that merit further in vivo evaluation, details
of which will be reported in due course.
References and notes
1. Hoyer, D.; Hannon, J. P.; Martin, G. R. Pharmacol.
Biochem. Behav. 2002, 71, 533.
2. Hoyer, D.; Martin, G. R. Behav. Brain Res. 1996, 73, 263.
3. Raymond, J. R.; Mukhin, Y. V.; Gelasco, A.; Turner, J.;
Collinsworth, G.; Gettys, T. W.; Grewal, J. S.; Gar-
novskayam, M. N. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001, 92, 179.
4. Thompson, A. J.; Lummis, S. C. R. Curr. Pharm. Des.
2006, 12, 3615.
5. Roth, B. L.; Lopez, E.; Patil, S.; Kroeze, W. K. Neuro-
scientist 2000, 6, 252.
6. For a recent review on the 5HT2A receptor, see: Leyson, J.
E. Curr. Drug Targets CNS Neurol. Disord. 2004, 3, 11.
7. Stefanski, R.; Goldberg, S. R. CNS Drugs 1997, 7, 388.
8. Dugovic, C. J. Sleep. Res. 1992, 1, 163.
In an assay to determine functional activity18,20 a repre-
sentative set of compounds, 35b (pKb = 8.3), 35g
(pKb = 8.2), 18b (pKb = 8.1), and 18e (pKb = 7.1), were
determined to be high affinity antagonists of the 5-
HT2A receptor.
9. Sharpley, A. L.; Elliott, J. M.; Attenburrow, M.-J.;
Cowen, P. J. Neuropharmacology 1994, 33, 467.
10. Rinaldi-Carmona, M.; Congy, C.; Santucci, V.; Simiano,
J.; Gautret, B.; Neliat, G.; Labbeeuw, B.; Le Fur, G.;
Soubrie, P.; Breliere, J. C. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1992,
262, 759.
In conclusion, replacement of an aminopyrimidine in an
initial HTS hit with an alkylpyrimidine was found to
provide a novel series of subtype selective 5-HT2A antag-
onists. Utilizing a convergent synthesis, the synthetic
accessibility made it possible to rapidly evaluate this
series. Selectivity and affinity for the 5-HT2A receptor
was found to be highly dependent upon proper position-
11. Kehne, J. H.; Baron, B. M.; Carr, A. A.; Chaney, S. F.;
Elands, J.; Feldman, D. J.; Frank, R. A.; Van Giersber-
gen, P. L. M.; McCloskey, T. C.; Johnson, M. P.;
McCarthy, D. R.; Poirot, M.; Senyah, Y.; Siegel, B. W.;
Widmaier, C. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1992, 277, 968.
12. (a) Fish, L. R.; Gilligan, M. T.; Humphries, A. C.;
Ivarsson, M.; Ladduwahetty, T.; Merchant, K. J.; O’Con-
nor, D.; Patel, S.; Philipps, E.; Vargas, H. M.; Hutson, P.
H.; MacLeod, A. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15,
3665; (b) Fletcher, S. R.; Burkamp, F.; Blurton, P.; Cheng,
S. K. F.; Clarkson, R.; O’Connor, D.; Spinks, D.; Tudge,
M.; van Niel, M. B.; Patel, S.; Chapman, K.; Marwood,
R.; Shepheard, S.; Bentley, G.; Cook, G. P.; Bristow, L. J.;
Castro, J. L.; Hutson, P. H.; MacLeod, A. M. J. Med.
Chem. 2002, 45, 492.
13. Sanfilippo, P. J.; Urbanski, M.; Williams, L.; Press, J. B.;
Katz, L. B.; Shriver, D. A.; Fernandez, J. A.; Shatynski,
D.; Offord, S. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 27, 655.
14. Representative procedures for Schemes 1 and 3: To a t-
BuOH (0.4 M) solution of the appropriate b-ketoester (1.1
equiv), and amidine hydrochloride (1.0 equiv) was added
Et3N (3.0 equiv). The reaction solution was heated at reflux
for 48 h, cooled to rt, and concentrated. The resulting solid
was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and washed with water. The
aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined
organic layers were dried and concentrated to give a solid
that was triturated with Et2O to give 12, 13, or 25–27
typically as white solids. To a 0 °C solution of 12, 13, or 25–
27 (1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.2 M) was added Et3N (1.1
equiv) followed by trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride
(1.1 equiv) dropwise over 10 min. After 2 h at 0 °C, the
mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed with water.
The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2. The
combined organic layers were dried and concentrated.
The resulting residue was purified via SiO2 chromatogra-
phy (10–30% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 14, 15, or 28–30
typically as clear oils or white solids. To 14, 15, or 28–30
Table 2. 5-HT2 binding data for analogs 34a, 19a, and 36a
Compound Structure
Kia (nM)
5-HT2A 5-HT2B
5-HT2C
Ph
2
N
N
34a
8.8
( 0.7)
1300b
150
( 32.0)
9
4
HN
5
F
Ph
2
N
N
19a
9.0
( 1.0)
310 ( 85) 75
( 25)
8
4
HN
5
F
Ph
2
N
N
36a
9
130
10,000b
5000
4
( 3)
( 3000)
5
F
N
H
a Values are means of two or three experiments in triplicate unless
indicated, SEM is in parentheses.
b Values are single experiments in triplicate.