substituent was located at a meso position. Here we describe
the synthesis of bacteriochlorins bearing lipophilic swallow-
tail motifs at the 2,12- or 3,13-positions.19 Such bacterio-
chlorins are of interest for PDT studies, the results of which
will be described elsewhere.
The de novo bacteriochlorin synthesis relies on a dihy-
drodipyrrin that can undergo self-condensation by virtue of
a free R-pyrrole position and an acetal at the R-position of
the pyrroline ring.3,9,20 Introduction of ꢀ-pyrrole substituents
can be achieved via precursors to the pyrrole or by bromi-
nation of the pyrrole employed to prepare the dihydrodipyr-
rin. The route to the swallowtail-substituted dihydrodipyrrin
is modeled on the reported synthesis of p-tolyl-substituted
dihydrodipyrrins, which accordingly required the synthesis
of a swallowtail pyrrole.
Figure 2. Newman projection showing the swallowtail alkyl chains
above and below the plane of a tetrapyrrole macrocycle.
that are stable by virtue of the presence of a geminal dimethyl
group in each reduced ring.9 The bacteriochlorins prepared
previously also contained p-tolyl groups at the 2- and 12-
positions,9,10 or bromo groups at the 3- and 13-positions.3
The latter provided a versatile scaffold for the introduction
of auxochromes (e.g., acetyl, ethynyl, vinyl) at the 3- and
13-positions via a variety of Pd-mediated coupling reactions.
For applications in photomedicine, the ability to tailor the
bacteriochlorin with groups ranging in polarity from lipo-
philic to hydrophilic is desirable for selectively targeting
biological organisms, organelles, or molecules. For lipophilic
architectures, we were drawn to the use of branched alkyl
(i.e., “swallowtail”)11 groups attached directly to the bacte-
riochlorin macrocycle. Swallowtail groups adopt a conforma-
tion wherein alkyl moieties project above and below the face
of the macrocycle (Figure 2), thereby suppressing aggregation
of the macrocycles. The suppression of aggregation is
important for retaining photochemical activity (i.e., fluores-
cence for optical imaging, intersystem crossing, and energy
transfer to oxygen for PDT). Swallowtail groups have been
employed with porphyrins,12–16 chlorins,17 and multipor-
phyrin arrays.18 The swallowtail groups include all-hydro-
carbon units (pent-3-yl,12 tridec-7-yl13,18 ) that afford in-
creased solubility in organic media, and polar-terminated
analogues (e.g., 1,5-diphosphonopent-3-yl) that afford solu-
bility in aqueous media.14–17 In each case, the swallowtail
A swallowtail-substituted pyrrole was prepared via the van
Leusen method,21 which employed swallowtail aldehyde 1
as a precursor. Two aldehydes, bearing methoxy or benzyl-
oxy termini were investigated. The benzyl ether proved
unstable to the final Ti(III)-mediated reductive cyclization
(Supporting Information). Methyl ether-substituted swallow-
tail aldehyde 1 was synthesized from commercially available
bromoethyl methyl ether via one of the two routes shown in
Scheme 1. Aldehyde 1 is a known compound,22 but the only
reported procedure requires five steps and a 20-fold excess
of the costly bromoethyl methyl ether. Route A follows
reported procedures for the synthesis of symmetrically
branched aldehydes23 and entails deprotonation of acetonitrile
with LDA followed by dialkylation with bromoethyl methyl
ether. The product after column chromatography contained
small amounts of monoalkylated and trialkylated nitriles;
reduction of this material with DIBALH followed by
chromatography afforded 1 in pure form. Route B employs
commercially available 4-methoxybutanol as the starting
material. Swern oxidation24 followed by treatment of the
crude product with cyclohexylamine and subsequent Kugel-
rohr distillation gave imine 3 in 89% yield. The procedure
to give 3 was readily carried out at >10 g scale. Deproto-
nation of the imine with LDA followed by alkylation with
bromoethyl methyl ether yielded 1 in 63% yield from 3, and
56% overall yield from 4-methoxybutanol. Route B was
superior owing to cleanliness, avoidance of aluminum salts,
and low cost of the starting materials.
(6) Brandis, A.; Mazor, O.; Neumark, E.; Rosenbach-Belkin, V.;
Salomon, Y.; Scherz, A. Photochem. Photobiol. 2005, 81, 983–993.
(7) (a) Limantara, L.; Koehler, P.; Wilhelm, B.; Porra, R. J.; Scheer, H.
Photochem. Photobiol. 2006, 82, 770–780. (b) Vakrat-Haglili, Y.; Weiner,
L.; Brumfeld, V.; Brandis, A.; Salomon, Y.; McIlroy, B.; Wilson, B. C.;
Pawlak, A.; Rozanowska, M.; Sarna, T.; Scherz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 6487–6497.
Reaction of
1
with (carbethoxymethylene)triphe-
nylphosphorane yielded unsaturated ester 4 in excellent yield.
Van Leusen reaction of 4 with TosMIC in Et2O/DMSO (2:
1) in the presence of NaH furnished swallowtail carbethoxy-
(8) Kozyrev, A. N.; Chen, Y.; Goswami, L. N.; Tabaczynski, W. A.;
Pandey, R. K. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1949–1960.
(9) Kim, H.-J. Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5475–5486.
(10) Fan, D.; Taniguchi, M.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
5350–5357.
(17) Borbas, K. E.; Chandrashaker, V.; Muthiah, C.; Kee, H. L.; Holten,
D.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3145– 3158.
(18) Thamyongkit, P.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5796–
5799.
(11) (a) Demmig, S.; Langhals, H. Chem. Ber. 1988, 121, 225–230. (b)
Langhals, H.; Demmig, S.; Potrawa, T. J. Prakt. Chem. 1991, 333, 733–
748.
(12) Wiehe, A.; Stollberg, H.; Runge, S.; Paul, A.; Senge, M. O.; Ro¨der,
(19) Preliminary studies concerning the 2,12-disubstituted bacteriochlo-
rins have been described in a patent application: Lindsey, J. S.; Laha, J. K.;
Muthiah, C.; Borbas, K. E. WO 2007/064842 A2.
B. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2001, 5, 853–860
.
(13) Thamyongkit, P.; Speckbacher, M.; Diers, J. R.; Kee, H. L.;
Kirmaier, C.; Holten, D.; Bocian, D. F.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
(20) Kim, H.-J.; Dogutan, D. K.; Ptaszek, M.; Lindsey, J. S. Tetrahedron
69, 3700–3710
.
2007, 63, 37–55.
(14) Borbas, K. E.; Mroz, P.; Hamblin, M. R.; Lindsey, J. S. Biocon-
jugate Chem. 2006, 17, 638–653
(21) van Leusen, A. M.; Siderius, H.; Hoogenboom, B. E.; van Leusen,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 5337–5340.
.
(15) Yao, Z.; Borbas, K. E.; Lindsey, J. S. New J. Chem. 2008, 32,
(22) Cheeseman, E. N. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1990, 22, 519–521.
(23) Vader, J.; Sengers, H.; de Groot, A. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2131–
2142.
436–451
.
(16) Borbas, K. E.; Kee, H. L.; Holten, D.; Lindsey, J. S. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2008, 6, 187–194
.
(24) Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 165–185.
1932
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008