ReductiVe Openings of Acetals
SCHEME 1. Examples of Regioselective Openings of
Benzylidene Acetals
gives the 4-O-benzyl ether in combination with BH3 ·THF and
the 6-O-benzyl ether with BH3 ·NMe3.9
Results
In our investigations of reductive openings of compound 1
we found that, irrespective of the Lewis acid used (AlCl3,
BF3 ·OEt2, In(OTf)3, Cu(OTf)2, AgOTf), the 4-O-benzyl ether
2 was formed using BH3 ·THF, and the 6-O-benzyl ether 3 was
isolated using BH3 ·NMe3 as reducing agent, in THF as solvent.
To our surprise, reductions using BH3 ·NMe3 were generally
faster compared to reactions using BH3 ·THF, despite the general
belief that BH3 ·THF is the more reactive reagent.10
A. Lewis Acid Activation of BH3 ·NMe3. We have previ-
ously introduced benzylic-phenolic acetals for the synthesis
of fluorescently labeled probes.11 These acetals were opened
under reductive conditions to yield double benzylic ethers, and
we realized that these compounds form an excellent model
system to investigate regioselective reductive openings of cyclic
acetals. Compounds 4a-i (Scheme 3) were thus synthesized
from the corresponding dimethyl acetals and opened using
BH3 ·NMe3-AlCl3 in THF at 0 °C.12 In all cases, double
benzylic ethers (compounds 5a-i) were isolated as the single
products.
their attention to boranes. They found that the reagent combina-
tion BH3 ·NMe3-AlCl3 gave different regioselectivity in dif-
ferent solvents, i.e., 6-O-benzyl ethers in THF and 4-O-benzyl
ethers in toluene or dichloromethane/ether mixtures. Due to
degradation, reactions in toluene usually gave low yields. The
methods are summarized in Scheme 1.
The proposed mechanism for reductive opening of acetals
presumes coordination of the Lewis acid to one of the oxygen
atoms, according to path A in Scheme 4, followed by reduction
of either the unopened acetal or the oxocarbenium ion. Irrespec-
tive of mechanistic pathway, the Lewis acid must associate with
the oxygen that will become a free hydroxyl group. Since only
compounds 5a-i were isolated, the Lewis acid must have
coordinated to the phenolic oxygen.
Despite the numerous reports on acid-mediated nucleophilic
addition to acetals,6 and the immense importance of regio-
selective reductive openings of acetals for organic chemistry
in general and for carbohydrate chemistry in particular, the
underlying principles for the regioselectivity are still not
understood.7 However, one mechanism, proposed by Garegg
(Scheme 2),8 explain the regioselective outcome by the differ-
ence in steric bulk between AlCl3 and a proton. This means
that in the original method, AlCl3 is supposedly first coordinated
to the sterically less demanding oxygen at position 6 (path A).
In contrary, in the NaCNBH3-HCl method the proton, which
is not restricted by steric effects, coordinates to O-4 to give the
more stable oxocarbenium ion at C-6 (path B).
The electrostatic potentials of the oxygen atoms in compounds
4a-i were calculated using density functional theory at the
B3LYP/6-31G* level.13 Throughout the series, the benzylic
oxygen showed the highest electrostatic potential. Interestingly,
the benzylic oxygen is thus both the more basic and also the
less sterically hindered oxygen atom, but not the one chosen
by the Lewis acid. With respect to these calculations, there are
two alternative explanations: (i) the relative energies of the two
oxocarbenium ions direct the regiochemistry or (ii) the outcome
is instead directed by initial coordination of the borane, followed
by coordination of the Lewis acid and subsequent reduction
(Scheme 4, path B).
There are several problems associated with this mechanistic
explanation. The major issue is the problem to explain the
regiochemical outcome of the reaction with BH3 ·NMe3-AlCl3
in THF, which follows path B, despite the obvious conclusion
that the strongly solvated AlCl3 ·THF would preferably associate
with the less sterically hindered O-6 to give the 4-O-benzyl
ether.5 This mechanism also fails to rationalize why Cu(OTf)2
To investigate these two options, we calculated the energy
of BH3 associated to the oxygen atoms of compound 4a,
generating structures 7a and 7b, as well as the relative energies
of two analogous oxocarbenium ions, i.e., structures 8a and 8b
(Chart 1).14 From the energy differences, the ratios were
calculated using the Boltzmann distribution and showed exclu-
sive preference for 7a and 8a. This means that the most stable
oxocarbenium ion and the most stable boron complex would
lead to the same product (i.e., compound 5a). As a control, we
calculated the energy of AlCl3 associated to the two oxygen
(4) (a) Garegg, P. J.; Hultberg, H. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 93, C10–C11. (b)
Garegg, P. J.; Hultberg, H.; Wallin, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1982, 108, 97–101.
(5) (a) Ek, M.; Garegg, P. J.; Hultberg, H.; Oscarson, S. J. Carbohydr. Chem.
1983, 2, 305–311. (b) Fu¨gedi, P.; Garegg, P. J.; Kvarnström, I.; Svansson, L.
J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1988, 7, 389–397. (c) Fu¨gedi, P.; Birberg, W.; Garegg,
P. J.; Pilotti, Å Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 164, 297–312.
(6) (a) Sammakia, T.; Smith, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10998–
10999. (b) Bartels, B.; Hunter, R. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6756–6765. (c)
Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8089–8110. (d)
Mori, I.; Ishihara, K.; Flippin, L. A.; Nozaki, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Bartlett, P. A.;
Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6107–6115.
(9) Shie, C.-R.; Tzeng, Z.-H.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Uang, B.-J.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Hung,
S.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1665–1668.
(10) Smith, K.; Pelter, A. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 8, p 708
(11) Johnsson, R.; Mani, K.; Cheng, F.; Ellervik, U. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 3444–3451.
(7) Stick, R. V. Carbohydrates: The Sweet Molecules of Life; Academic Press:
London, 2001, p 53.
(12) Experimental details can be found in the Supporting Information.
(13) Spartan ‘02 for Macintosh, Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA.
(14) Jaguar, version 7.0, Schro¨dinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2007.
(8) Garegg, P. J. In PreparatiVe Carbohydrate Chemistry; Hanessian, S., Ed.;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996; pp 53-67..
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 14, 2008 5227