stannylene acetal of 5.11 Subsequent acylation of the remain-
ing hydroxyl with acryloyl chloride provided easy access to
triene 4 in 70% yield over two steps and set the stage for
examination of the proposed metathesis reaction.
Scheme 2. Preparation and RCM of 4
To establish the feasibility of our approach, we first needed
to determine the regiochemical outcome of ring-closing
metathesis of 4. Two modes of closure, metathesis between
the acrylate group and either the proximal olefin to give 3
or the distal olefin to give 6, are possible (Scheme 2). At
the outset, it was unclear which pathway would be favored;
however, both 3 and 6 are potentially valuable synthetic
intermediates, so we felt that either outcome would be
productive. In the event, we found that treatment of 4 with
10 mol % of the second generation Grubbs’ catalyst 712 in
either refluxing PhH or CH2Cl2 resulted in the formation of
3 as the only isolable product in 52 and 58% yield,
respectively. The assignment of 3 as the RCM product was
based on the relatively large downfield shifts of the â proton
(7.47 ppm) in the 1H NMR spectrum and the carbonyl carbon
(172.6 ppm) in 13C NMR spectrum and later confirmed by
comparison (vide infra). In a preliminary examination of the
effect of the protecting group on regioselectivity, we found
that RCM of the TBS-protected analogue of 4 also gave only
the five-membered lactone product (55%). Efforts to ma-
nipulate the observed RCM regiochemistry to provide for
complementary preparation of dihydropyranones such as 6
are in progress.
2-enyl)-5H-furan-2-ones, such as muricatacin precursor 2,
could be constructed directly from acyclic trienes (4) by a
tandem process in which lactone ring formation and chain
extension are achieved by olefin metathesis. Initial ring-
closing metathesis7 (RCM) of 4 would provide an intermedi-
ate butenolide 3, in which the two olefins are clearly
differentiated by their electronic environments. Intermolecu-
lar cross metathesis8 (CM) between the terminal olefin of 3
and an alkene coupling partner (RCHdCH2) would complete
the tandem to provide an extended hydroxyalkenylbutenolide
(2).9 Specific to our proposed muricatacin synthesis, benzyl-
protected acrylate ester 4, available from C2-symmetric
dienediol 5, and 1-dodecene would serve as substrates for
the RCM/CM tandem.
Encouraged by the yield and selectivity observed for RCM
of 4, we turned our attention to its incorporation into the
proposed RCM/CM process for the preparation of the chain-
extended butenolide 2. Two procedures were examined: a
sequential method in which the cross coupling partner (1-
dodecene) was added after RCM of 4 was complete and a
tandem method in which both 1-dodecene and triene 4 were
present at the time of addition of metathesis catalyst 7.13 Our
results are summarized in Table 1. For the sequential
procedure, a 0.005 M solution of triene 414 and catalyst 7
(10 mol %) in either PhH or CH2Cl2 was refluxed until TLC
analysis indicated complete conversion of 4 to RCM product
3 at which time 5 equiv of 1-dodecene was added (entries 1
and 2). At either temperature, conversion of 4 to 3 required
approximately 24 h. We were pleased to find that addition
of the alkene coupling partner resulted in completion of the
metathesis sequence to provide 2 in respectable overall yields.
CM generated 2 with complete (E)-selectivity for the acyclic
Preparation of metathesis substrate 4 began with (R,R)-
hexa-1,5-diene-3,4-diol 5, which is conveniently prepared
in multigram quantities from D-mannitol (Scheme 2).10
Desymmetrization was achieved by monobenzylation of the
(4) For examples, see: (a) Yoshimitsu, T.; Makino, T.; Nagaoka, H. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1993. (b) Sinha, S. C; Sinha, S. C; Keinan, E. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7067. (c) Ha, J. D.; Cha, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 10012. (d) Pearson, W. H.; Hembre, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 7217.
(5) For recent syntheses of muricatacin, see: (a) Yoshimitsu, T.; Makino,
T.; Nagaoka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7548. (b) Bernard, A. M.; Frongia,
A.; Piras, P. P.; Secci, F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2923. (c) Popsavin, V.; Krstic,
I.; Popsavin, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8897. (d) Raghavan, S.; Joseph,
S. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 101. (e) Carda, M.; Rodriguez,
S.; Gonzalez, F.; Castillo, E.; Villanueva, A.; Marco, J. A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 15, 2649. (f) Chandrasekhar, M.; Chandra, K. L.; Singh, V.
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2773. (g) Konno, H.; Hiura, N.; Yanura,
M. Heterocycles 2002, 57, 1793. (h) Baylon, C.; Prestat, G.; Heck, M. P.;
Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3833. (i) Trost, B. M.; Rhee,
Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11680. (j) Solladie, G.; Hanquet, G.;
Izzo, I.; Crumbie, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3071. (k) Couladouros,
E. A.; Mihou, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4861.
1
olefin as determined by H NMR (J ) 15.4 Hz). None of
the (Z)-isomer was detected.
For the tandem procedure, catalyst 7 (10 mol %) was
added to a 0.005 M solution of triene 414 and 5 equiv of
1-dodecene in either PhH or CH2Cl2, and the reaction
mixtures were heated to reflux. Considering the expected
rate difference for intra- vs intermolecular metatheses, we
(6) For two recently isolated examples, see: (a) Liaw, C. C.; Chang, F.
R.; Wu, M. J.; Wu, Y. C. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 279. (b) Xie, H. H.; Wei,
X. Y.; Wang, J. D.; Liu, M. F.; Yang, R. Z. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2003, 14,
588.
(7) For recent reviews on the use of ring-closing metathesis for the
synthesis of heterocycles, see: (a) Dieters, A.; Martin, S. F. Chem. ReV.
2004, 104, 2199. (b) Walters, M. A. Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2003, 15, 1.
(c) Furstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012.
(8) For a recent review of olefin cross metathesis, see: Connon, S. J.;
Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42, 1900.
(9) For synthesis of δ-alkenyl â,γ-unsaturated δ-lactones by RCM/CM,
see: Virolleaud, M. A.; Bressy, C.; Piva, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
8081.
(10) (a) Burke, S. D.; Sametz, G. M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 72. (b) Crombez-
Robert, C.; Benazza, M.; Frechou, C.; Demailly, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1997,
303, 359.
(11) Rama Rao, A. V.; Mysorekar, S. V.; Gurjar, M. K.; Yadav, J. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 2183.
(12) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
953.
(13) For definitions of sequential and tandem reactions, see: Denmark,
S. E.; Thorasen, A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 137.
(14) Yields were greatly diminished if reactions were performed at higher
concentration.
4144
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 23, 2004