346
E. W. Yue et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 343–346
Table 3. Enzymatic and cellular activity of 8q
uation. It displayed activity in CDK2/A and CDK1/B
and good selectivity against other kinase targets such as
the tyrosine kinase c-abl and protein kinases A and C
(Table 3). Compound 8q was also tested in a broad
panel of human and murine tumor cell lines. Very good
activity against these cell lines with several IC50 values
less than 50 nM was seen.
IC50 (nM)a
IC50 (nM)a
87
CDK2/A
CDK1/B6
c-abl
PKA
PKC
AG1523 (arrested)
B16-F1
H1299
13
HT29
HT1080
30
17,600
>42,000
<42,000
>21,000
160
L1210
MCF7
MiaPaCa2
NCI-H358
NCI-H460
PC3
105
23
26
18
104
125
25
The interesting profile of 8q resulted in extensive eval-
uation of its effects on the cell cycle and profiling in
vivo. The compound displayed good activity in HCT116
xenografts and in a MMTV neu transgenic model. These
results will be reported in detail in due course.
12
55
HMEC
Skut 1A
a Values correspond to n=2.
The current SAR studies have led to several significant
findings. Compound 8q was found to be quite active in
HCT116 even in the presence of plasma protein. Just as
important was the fact that it was inactive in AG1523
which may be an indicator of an enhanced therapeutic
window. In addition, 8q displayed good selectivity
against other kinase targets and very good activity in a
large panel of tumor cell lines. These results will allow
us to further refine our efforts in developing the optimal
CDK inhibitor in the indenopyrazole series.
HCT116, was used to determine the effectiveness of
these inhibitors in deterring cellular proliferation with
and without plasma proteins (human serum albumin
and a-1-acidglycoprotein). In addition, some of the
compounds were tested in AG1523, a normal human
fibroblast. AG1523 was chosen to give some indication
of the potential therapeutic window these inhibitors
possessed between proliferating cells versus arrested
normal cells. Most of the compounds in Table 1 showed
good translation from the enzymatic assays into the
cellular assay. Most notable were the thiazolyl analo-
gues 8n and 8q. Not only were they quite active in inhi-
biting HCT116, they retained their potency in the
presence of plasma proteins.
References and notes
1. (a) Lee, M.-H.; Yang, H.-Y. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58,
1907. (b) Owa, T.; Yoshino, H.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Nagasu,
T. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1487. (c) Sausville, E. A.;
Johnson, J.; Alley, M.; Zaharevitz, D.; Senderowicz, A. M.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2000, 910,
207. (d) McDonald, E. R., III; El-Deiry, W. S. Intl. J.
Oncol. 2000, 16, 871. (e) Fry, D.; Garrett, M. D. Cur.
Opin. Oncol. Endocrine Metab. Investig. Drugs 2000, 2, 40.
(f) Sielecki, T. M.; Boylan, J. F.; Benfield, P. A.; Trainor,
G. L. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1.
2. (a) Morgan, D. O. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997, 13,
261. (b) Pines, J. Semin. Cell Biol. 1994, 5, 399. (c) Hart-
well, L. H.; Kastan, M. B. Science 1994, 266, 1821. (d)
Sherr, C. J. Cell 1993, 73, 1059.
3. Nugiel, D. A.; Etzkorn, A.-M.; Vidwans, A.; Benfield,
P. A.; Boisclair, M.; Burton, C. R.; Cox, S.; Czerniak,
P. M.; Doleniak, D.; Seitz, S. P. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44,
1334.
4. Nugiel, D. A.; Vidwans, A.; Etzkorn, A.-M.; Rossi, K. A.;
Benfield, P. A.; Burton, C. R.; Cox, S.; Doleniak, D.;
Seitz, S. P. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5224.
5. Yue, E. W.; Higley, C. A.; DiMeo, S. V.; Carini, D. J.;
Nugiel, D. A.; Benware, C.; Benfield, P. A.; Burton, C. R.;
Cox, S.; Grafstrom, R. H.; Sharp, D. M.; Sisk, L. M.;
Boylan, J. F.; Muckelbauer, J. K.; Smallwood, A. M.;
Chen, H.; Chang, C.-H.; Seitz, S. P.; Trainor, G. L. J.
Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5233.
For the thienylamides of Table 2, the results in HCT116
showed moderate to good enzymatic to cellular transla-
tion. Unfortunately most of these thienylamides were
highly protein bound with IC50’s greater than 2500 nM
with the exception being 10p.
Analysis of the AG1523 data revealed that most of the
thienylamides tested had activity in AG1523 which was
deemed unacceptable (Table 2). For example compound
10p which had the best HCT116 protein-adjusted IC50
result was also quite potent against AG1523. Exami-
nation of the data in Table 1 revealed that semi-
carbazides derived from 1,1-dimethylhydrazine showed
poor selectivity for HCT116 over AG1523. The results,
however, improved with the cyclic semicarbazides.
Compound 8k had an IC50 in AG1523 greater than
17,000 nM. Although encouraging the HCT116 protein-
adjusted IC50 was still quite high. Further evaluation
revealed that both thiazolyl compounds, 8n and 8q were
inactive in AG1523 yet had activity in HCT116 even in
the presence of plasma proteins.
With its potent activity in HCT116 and large differential
in AG1523, compound 8q was selected for further eval-