Angewandte
Chemie
ization strategy could expedite the assembly of natural
products that contain a highly substituted pyrrole core
[Eq. (2)]. We envisioned that the key structural architecture
of 1 could be directly installed from a simple pyrrole nucleus
À
by a metal-catalyzed C Hbond arylation to produce the
heterobiaryl framework, and subsequent oxidative PdII-cata-
À
lyzed pyrrole C Hbond cyclization to form the indolizinone
structure [Eq. (3)]. This strategy would facilitate the elabo-
ration of the pyrrole nucleus in comparison to the conven-
tional metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, and reinforce
À
the utility of catalytic C Hbond functionalization as a
powerful tactic in natural product synthesis.
For the synthesis of 1 [Eq. (2)], we were confident that we
could use our approach to control the site of arylation,
À
Scheme 2. Second step of the iterative pyrrole C H bond functionali-
zation strategy. Bz=benzoyl.
À
although it was not clear whether subsequent C Hbond
functionalizations could be similarly directed. Therefore, our
II
À
Pd -catalyzed C Halkenylation on 3c, it reacted predom-
À
initial investigation focused on the development of a C H
inantly at the C5 position to form 4c (9:1 C5:C2) presumably
because the C2 position is more sterically congested. Notably,
the nature of the aryl group at C3 did not influence the
selectivity (2-NO2Ph, Ph, and 4-NO2Ph gave the same C5
alkenylation products). Whereas this tactic provided a
straightforward method for a directed synthesis of 3,4- and
3,5-disubstituted pyrrole derivatives, it would not be amena-
ble for the assembly of the 2,3-disubstituted pyrrole motif of
1.
bond arylation reaction analogous to our previous alkenyla-
tion studies;[7b] however, despite our best attempts we were
unable to effect such a process suitable for rhazinicine (1).
Instead, we adopted the Ir -catalyzed C Hborylation,
developed by the groups of Smith–Malezcka and Hartwig–
Miyuara,[8] to furnish the desired pyrrole nucleus and then
performed a Suzuki coupling. When testing this strategy with
the Hartwig–Miyaura conditions[8b,c] (Table 1) we found that a
I
À
We therefore considered the installation of a temporary
blocking group for the C5 position. Upon closer examination
of other rhazinilam syntheses we noticed that in all cases the
route required the addition of a group to shield the C5
position of the pyrrole ring. Although not explicitly
explained, we propose that this step prevents competing
oxidative pyrrole dimerization reactions, which is in line with
our own observations regarding the behavior of these
heteroarenes. We installed a SiMe3 (TMS) group at C5 to
prevent the potential side reactions and to provide a handle
for controlling the selectivity of the reaction.
À
Table 1: Investigation of
a
regioselective one-pot C H arylation
process.[a]
Entry
R1
X
C3:C2
Product
Yield [%]
1
2
3
iPr3Si
iPr3Si
Boc
NO2
H
NO2
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
3a
3b
3c
82
68
78
The TMS-protected pyrrole 2c underwent a one-pot IrI-
catalyzed borylation and Suzuki coupling to form the desired
pyrrole isomer with arylation at C3 (Scheme 3). Presumably,
[a] B2pin2 =bis(pinacolato)diboron; cod=cycloocta-1,5-diene; dtbpy=
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine; S-Phos=2-dicyclohexylphosphino-
2’,6’-dimethoxy-1,1’-biphenyl; mw=microwave.
range of N-protected pyrroles underwent microwave-assisted
I
À
Ir -catalyzed C Hborylation, which was exclusively selective
for the C3 position of the pyrrole ring in the presence of both
N-Boc and N-TIPS groups. Moreover, the Suzuki coupling[9]
was performed as part of the same transformation by directly
adding the required components to the reaction mixture, thus
enabling the isolation of 3a–c in a single step from 2a–c in
excellent yield (Table 1).
À
Scheme 3. Iterative C H bond functionalization to 2,3-difunctionalized
pyrroles.
the SiMe3 group at C5 and the N-Boc motif cooperatively
directed borylation to C3, and hence, arylation to the C3
À
The next step in the model studies for an iterative
functionalization approach to rhazinicine (1), was to assess
position. In turn, C Hbond alkenylation is forced to the C2
position; it proceeded in good yield to form 4c, although the
reaction required higher temperatures because of the more
hindered nature of this position. This model iterative coupling
strategy now enables the formation of the 2,3-disubstituted
pyrrole isomer required for 1.
II
À
the selectivity of the subsequent Pd -catalyzed C Halkeny-
À
lation. The reaction with TIPS-protected pyrrole 3a led to C
Hbond alkenylation at the C4 position to give 4a, in
accordance with our hypothesis (Scheme 2).[7b] Boc-protected
pyrrole 3c could potentially react at either the C2 or the C5
position under these reaction conditions. When we tested the
Therefore, confident that we could control the function-
alization of pyrrole rings, we applied this tactic to our
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3004 –3007
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim