OCH2CH2CH2CH2); ESI-MS m/z: calcd for C72H108N4O12Na (M + Na)
1244.7, found 1243.6.
are used, macrocycles with well defined sequences of (different)
structural elements attached to these phenolic units will result."
Finally, suitable bifunctional fragments might be attached to the
urea residues in alternative ways (e.g. via easily cleavable ester
links), and reactions different from metathesis may also be used for
the ring closure (step iv), as long as these reactions are possible
under conditions in which the tetraurea dimers exist.
1
11 (n 5 1): yield: 65%. m.p. . 300 uC, phase transition 65–70 uC; H
NMR (dmso-d6): d 5 9.80 (s, 4H, –NH), 6.79 (br d, 8H, ArH), 6.20 (br t,
4H, ArH), 3.99 (br t, 16H, OCH2CH2OCH2), 3.63 (br t, 16H,
OCH2CH2O), 3.43 (br t, 16H, OCH2CH2O), 1.99 (s, 12H, C[O]CH3),
1.53 (m, 16H, OCH2CH2CH2); ESI-MS m/z: calcd for C64H92N4O20Na
(M + Na) 1260.4, found 1259.6.
" In a very recent publication (3,5-dialkenyloxy)benzyl ether residues were
attached to a bis(terpyridine) ligand, which forms a cyclic hexameric
complex with six Ru(III) cations. A metathesis reaction leads to a
connection of six units similar to 1 or 2, but the yield of the resulting
macrocycle is not reported; see ref. 14. While the preorganisation of six
‘‘monomeric units’’ is on principle advantageous, if wrong connections can
be avoided, an extension to the regular incorporation of different
monomeric units A, B, C is clearly not possible in this case.
This
work
was
supported
by
the
Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bo 523/14-4, SFB 625) and the Fonds
der Chemischen Industrie.
Yudong Cao,a Leyong Wang,a Michael Bolte,b Myroslav O. Vysotskya
and Volker Bo¨hmer*a
aAbteilung Lehramt Chemie, Fachbereich Chemie, Pharmazie und
Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg – Universita¨t, D-55099 Mainz,
Germany. E-mail: vboehmer@mail.uni-mainz.de
1 Templated Organic Synthesis, ed. F. Diederich and P. J. Stang, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
2 D. Voet, J. G. Voet and C. W. Pratt, Fundamentals of Biochemistry,
Wiley, New York, 2002.
bFachbereich Chemie und pharmazeutische Wissenschaften, Institut fu¨r
Organische Chemie, J.-W. Goethe Universita¨t, D-60439 Frankfurt/
Main, Germany
3 (a) A. Chuchuryukin, H. P. Dijkstra, B. M. J. M. Suijkerbuijk, R. J. M.
Klein Gebbink, G. P. M. van Klink, A. M. Mills, A. L. Spek and G. van
Koten, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 228; (b) S. Anderson,
H. L. Anderson and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1995, 2255–2267.
4 C. J. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 7017.
5 (a) S. Ho¨ger and A.-D. Meckenstock, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5,
1686–1691; (b) B. C. Gibb, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 5180.
6 (a) Molecular Catenanes, Rotaxanes and Knots, ed. J.-P. Sauvage and
C. Dietrich-Buchecker, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999; (b) O. Lukin and
F. Vo¨gtle, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1456–1477; (c) S. J. Cantrill,
K. S. Chichak, A. J. Peters and J. F. Stoddart, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005,
38, 1–9; (d) L. Wang, M. O. Vysotsky, A. Bogdan, M. Bolte and
V. Bo¨hmer, Science, 2004, 304, 1312–1314.
7 S. C. Zimmerman, M. S. Wendland, N. A. Rakow, I. Zharov and
K. S. Suslick, Nature, 2002, 418, 399–403.
8 Y. Kim, F. M. Mayer and S. C. Zimmerman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2003, 42, 1121–1126.
9 F. Hof, L. C. Craig, C. Nuckolls and J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2002, 41, 1488–1508.
10 M. O. Vysotsky, A. Bogdan, L. Wang and V. Bo¨hmer, Chem.
Commun., 2004, 1268–1269.
11 R. K. Castellano, B. H. Kim and J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 12671–12672.
12 T. M. Trnka and R. H. Grubbs, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 18–29.
13 See for example: A. Pop, M. O. Vysotsky, M. Saadioui and V. Bo¨hmer,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 1124–1125.
14 P. Wang, S. F. Moorefield and J. Newkome, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2005, 44, 1579–1683.
15 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for refinement of crystal
structures, University of Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
Notes and references
{ Single crystals of 6 (m 5 10, Y 5 CH3) could be obtained by slow
crystallisation from THF–methanol (2:1). Crystal data for 6:
C100H128N8O16?8 CH4O?1.5 H2O, M 5 1981.46, triclinic, space group
¯
P1, a 5 18.8106(15) s, b 5 23.1537(18) s, c 5 28.968(2) s, a 5 98.409(6)u,
b 5 104.443(6)u, c 5 102.706(6)u, V 5 11645.5(15) s3 T 5 173 K, Z 5 4,
Dc 5 1.130 g cm23, l (Mo Ka) 5 0.71073 s, 93167 reflections measured,
38675 unique (Rint 5 0.198) which were used in all calculations. The
structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXL-9715) and refined by full-
matrix least-squares methods on F2 with 2548 parameters. R1 5 0.1560 [I .
2s(I)] and wR2 5 0.3756, GOF 5 1.252; max/min residual density 1.379/
20.590 e s23. CCDC reference number 265476. See http://www.rsc.org/
suppdata/cc/b5/b505223h/index.sht for crystallographic data in CIF or
other electronic format.
§ General procedure for the synthesis of macrocycles 7: the compound 6
(m 5 8, 10, 14, 20) (0.025 mmol) was refluxed in acetic acid (20 mL) for
24 hours. After cooling, acetic acid was removed in vacuo. The residue was
separated and purified by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent
CH2Cl2–MeOH 5 20:1) giving 7 as the first eluted compound and 8.
Macrocycle 11 was prepared in a similar way.
7 (m 5 8): yield: 50%; m.p. . 300 uC, phase transition 136–140 uC; 1H
NMR (dmso-d6): d 5 9.79 (s, 4H, NH), 6.77 (br d, 8H, ArH), 6.14 (br t,
4H, ArH), 3.87 (t, 3J 5 6.5 Hz, 16H, OCH2), 1.99 (s, 12H, C[O]CH3), 1.66
(m, 16H, OCH2CH2), 1.38–1.24 (m, 32H, OCH2CH2CH2CH2); ESI-MS
m/z: calcd for C64H92N4O12Na (M + Na) 1132.4, found 1132.7.
7 (m 5 10): yield: 66%. m.p. . 300 uC, phase transition 130–135 uC; 1H
NMR (dmso-d6): d 5 9.78 (s, 4H, NH), 6.77 (d, 4J 5 2.0 Hz, 8H, ArH),
6.14 (br t, 4H, ArH), 3.87 (t, 3J 5 6.5 Hz, 16H, OCH2), 1.99 (s, 12H,
C[O]CH3), 1.67–1.63 (m, 16H, OCH2CH2), 1.36–1.23 (m, 48H,
3134 | Chem. Commun., 2005, 3132–3134
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005