Cu-Catalyzed Three-Component Reactions
TABLE 1. Reactivity of Different Azides in the Presence of
Aminesa
SCHEME 1
entry
R1
solvent
conv (%)b A/Bb yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
PhCH2
PhCH2
PhCH2
Ph
PhCO
(4-NO2)C6H4CO THF
(PhO)2PO
PhSO2
(4-Me)C6H4SO2 THF
THF
CH3CN
>99
>99
>99
95
27
>99
81
>99
>99
>99
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
1:>99
1:>99
1:>99
2:98
88 (A)
92 (A)
90 (A)
82 (A)
9 (B)
41 (B)
58 (B)
93 (B)
89 (B)
82 (B)
t-BuOH/H2Od
THF
THF
THF
5
However, when acyl, sulfonyl, or phosphoryl azides are
employed, the corresponding triazoles are obtained in poor yield
under the standard CuAAC conditions (vide infra). In fact, in
the presence of primary or secondary amines, sulfonyl azides
produce amidines in excellent yield at room temperature.5a,c The
scope of this mild three-component reaction is extremely broad
with regard to all three components, and phosphoryl azides also
served as a high-yielding type of azide to give the corresponding
N-phosphoryl amidines.5b Likewise, the copper-catalyzed reac-
tion of sulfonyl azides, 1-alkynes, and alcohols readily takes
place to afford imidates under similar conditions.6 Additionally,
a novel nonconventional approach for the formation of acyl
sulfonamides has been developed by using the same procedure,
employing water as the third reactant in this case (Scheme 1).7,22
The synthetic utility of generated molecules from the Cu-
catalyzed three-component couplings has been extensively
investigated in various areas. For example, amidine derivatives
are utilized as potent pharmacophores8 as well as efficient
organocatalysts.9 Imidates are used as key intermediates for the
conversion to useful synthetic building blocks,10 and acyl
sulfonamides are well-known to have interesting bioactivities.11
Moreover, this catalytic approach has been readily applied to
the preparation of other types of synthetically interesting
compounds such as azetidinimines,12 iminocoumarins,13 and
indoline derivatives.14 Recently, CuAAC with sulfonyl azides
was also employed for the synthesis of macrocycles.15 While
appreciation of the Cu-catalyzed three-component reaction as
a tool for the synthesis of high utility continues to expand, a
6e
7e
8
THF
THF
9
1:>99
1:>99
10 MeSO2
a Conditions: phenylacetylene (0.5 mmol), azide (1.2 equiv),
diisopropylamine (1.2 equiv), CuI (10 mol %) in the indicated solvent.
b Determined by 1H NMR relative to an internal standard,
1,3-benzodioxane.
c Isolated
yield.
d t-BuOH/H2O
)
3:1.
e Decomposition of azides occurred simultaneously and no detectable
side products resulting from reaction with phenylacetylene were
observed.
more detailed mechanistic description is required to further
synthetic developments. Herein, we report our results of detailed
mechanistic investigations of the Cu-catalyzed three-component
reaction based on the product distribution, intermediate trapping
experiments, kinetic parameters, and computational studies.
Results and Discussion
Product Distribution in the Cu-Catalyzed Three-Compo-
nent Reactions. While CuAAC between aryl- or alkyl azides
and 1-alkynes readily provides 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles,
it was observed that sulfonyl azides predominantly yield
amidines when the reaction is carried out in the presence of
primary or secondary amines.5a We were, therefore, interested
in the reactivity of similarly electron-deficient azides and the
effects of their substitution on the outcome of the reaction (i.e.,
triazole to amidine product ratio). As Table 1 illustrates, both
yields and chemoselectivity of these reactions are indeed
strongly dependent on the nature of the participating azides.
As expected, both benzyl and phenyl azides readily partici-
pated in the cycloaddition reaction, and no incorporation of the
diisopropylamine in the product was observed (Table 1, entries
1-4). In sharp contrast, when benzoyl azide was employed, an
amidine species (B, R1 ) PhCO) was exclusively observed with
much lower efficiency (entry 5). Introduction of an electron-
withdrawing group on the benzoyl azide reactants significantly
accelerated the reaction, leading to the corresponding amidine
in better yield (41%), still with excellent selectivity (entry 6).
Phosphoryl azide was similarly reactive, producing the corre-
sponding amidine species exclusively (entry 7). Unsurprisingly,
sulfonyl azides were the most reactive in this reaction, providing
amidines in highest yields, regardless of their electronic proper-
ties (entries 8-10).
(3) (a) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599. (b) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal,
M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064.
(4) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2004–2021.
(5) (a) Bae, I.; Han, H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2038–
2039. (b) Kim, S. H.; Jung, D. Y.; Chang, S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9769–
9771. (c) Kim, J. Y.; Kim, S. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1745–
1749.
(6) Yoo, E. J.; Bae, I.; Cho, S. H.; Han, H.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
1347–1350.
(7) (a) Cho, S. H.; Yoo, E. J.; Bae, I.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 16046–16047. (b) Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
1897–1900. (c) Cho, S. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Chang, S. Org. Synth. 2008, 85, 131–
137. (d) Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2836–2839.
(8) Greenhill, J. V.; Lue, P. Prog. Med. Chem. 1993, 30, 203–326.
(9) (a) Boyd, G. V. In The Chemistry of Amidines and Imidates; Patai, S.,
Rappoport, Z., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1991; Vol. 2,Chapter 8. (b) Barker, J.;
Kilner, M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1994, 133, 219–300. (c) Birman, V. B.; Li, X.;
Han, Z. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 37–40.
(10) (a) Neilson, D. G. In The Chemistry of Amdines and Imidates; Patai,
S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: London, UK, 1975; Chapter 8. (b) Kantlehner, W.
Synthesis of Iminium Salts, Orthoesters and Related Compounds. In Compre-
hensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford,
UK, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 485-599. (c) Kochi, T.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 15652–15653.
A similar trend on the azide reactivity was also observed when
alcohols were used as nucleophiles (Table 2). It should be noted
that a tertiary amine additive, representatively triethylamine, was
required to obtain satisfactory yields. As expected, reaction of
phenylacetylene with benzyl azide afforded the corresponding
triazole (A, R1 ) PhCH2) as a major product even in the
presence of benzyl alcohol (entry 1). Reaction of sulfonyl azides,
in sharp contrast, resulted in almost exclusive formation of
(11) Humphrey, J. M.; Chamberlin, A. R. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2243–2266.
(12) (a) Whiting, M.; Fokin, V. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3157–
3161. (b) Xu, X.; Cheng, D.; Li, J.; Guo, H.; Yan, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1585–
1587.
(13) Cui, S.-L.; Lin, X.-F.; Wang, Y.-G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4517–4520.
(14) Yoo, E. J.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1163–1166.
(15) Jin, Y.; Fu, H.; Yin, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Synlett 2007, 901–904.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 14, 2008 5521