conformational disorder plays a detrimental role in the
electrical conductance of OPEs, since the relative orientation
of the phenylene units determines the extent of orbital
overlapping and π-electron delocalization along the back-
bone.7 By affecting the conjugation length and bandgap, the
molecular conformation of the PE backbone inevitably affects
the spectroscopic properties and energy migration charac-
teristics along the molecules as well. Additionally, because
rigid, planar aromatic structures tend to promote strengthened
intermolecular interactions, the self-association behaviors are
also influenced by the backbone shape. Effectively, the
molecular dynamics of OPE/PPEs imposes critical influence
over all their aforementioned applications.
Despite the great importance of the planar conformation
of the PE structures, achieving precise control is challenging.
Previous strategies employed to constrain or maneuver the
relative orientation of the phenylene units in OPE/PPEs
involve covalently tethering,8a–c implementing surfactant
effect at the interface,8d increasing structural planarity in
nematic liquid crystal solutions,8e–g exploiting steric interac-
tions between backbone substituents,8h and introducing
charges into the molecules.8i,9 Our current study aimed to
sythesize a series of OPEs with their conformation confined
in the coplanar state by intramolecular H-bonds between the
side chains of adjacent phenylene units. A side-chain
H-bonding motif was previously introduced into meta-PE
oligomers, conferring a coplanar orientation for the diphe-
nylacetylene moieties.10 With newly developed synthetic
protocols, an analogous design is now implemented in the
para-PE system. The syntheses of such a series of OPEs
1-3 are presented here. Their monodispersed, systematically
extended chain lengths were designed to impart information
of intramolecular H-bonding effects and facilitate future
molecular-wire studies. Photophysical characterization of the
oligomers provided evidence for the rigid, planar structures
with extended effective conjugation lengths.
The synthetic routes of OPEs 1-3 are outlined in Scheme
1. The basic synthetic strategy was to join key intermediate
2,5-diethynyl-1,4-phenylenedihexanamide with (di)iodo-
substituted dihexyl terephthalate via repetitive Sonogashira
cross-coupling reactions and proper protection/deprotection
protocols.11 The NHs in the bisamide functionality and the
carbonyl groups of the terephthalate acted as the H-bonding
donor and acceptor, respectively, in the final OPEs. Such
H-bonding motif was previously proven to hinder the
rotational motion of the phenylene units in m-PE systems.10
As the chain length increased from 1 to 3, the solubility of
the molecules was noted to decrease drastically and OPE 3
was only sparsely soluble in chloroform, the best solvent
found.12 Thus, the purfication of 3 was difficult and strenu-
ous. This decrease in solubility suggested the presence of
rigid, planar backbones,13 which enhanced intermolecular
interactions and self-association.
The formation of intramolecular H-bonds in OPEs 1–3
1
was confirmed by H NMR spectroscopy. In intermediates
6 and 7 (as well as in compound 16), the amide protons (NH)
exhibited chemical shifts in the range of 7.8-8.0 ppm in
CDCl3, while all the amide protons in oligomers 1-3
displayed chemical shifts of ca. 9.0-9.2 ppm, indicating
intramolecular H-bond formation in the latter. It was hoped
that the formation and disruption of these H-bonds could be
reversibly controlled by varying the solution temperature or
by changing the solvent properties, thereby to study the
molecular properties under different conformations. Yet,
these intramolecular H-bonds proved to be robust. A minimal
chemical shift change was observed with the NH proton in
CDCl3 by varied-temperature NMR technique ranging from
20 to 60 °C (Figure S1), or by titrating DMSO-d6 into the
CDCl3 solution, indicating preservation of the H-bonds under
these conditions.14
Soc. 2008, 130, 1080. (b) Moore, A. M.; Mantooth, B. A.; Donhauser, Z. J.;
Yao, Y.; Tour, J. M.; Weiss, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10352. (c)
Yeganeh, S.; Galperin, M.; Ratner, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
13313. (d) Wang, C.; Batsanov, A.; Bryce, M. R.; Ashwell, G. J.; Urasinska,
B.; Grace, I.; Lambert, C. J. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 1. (e) Guo, X.;
Small, J. P.; Klare, J. E.; Wang, Y.; Purewal, M. S.; Tam, I. W.; Hong,
B. H.; Caldwell, R.; Huang, L.; O’Brien, S.; Yan, J.; Breslow, R.; Wind,
S. J.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Nuckolls, C. Science 2006, 311, 356. (f) Seferos,
D. S.; Blum, A. S.; Kushmerick, J. G.; Bazan, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 11260. (g) Xiao, X.; Nagahara, L. A.; Rawlett, A. M.; Tao,
N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9235.
(6) Okuyama, K.; Hasegawa, T.; Ito, M.; Mikami, N. J. Phys. Chem.
1984, 88, 1711.
(7) For recent studies, see: (a) Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yin, G. Comput. Mater.
Sci. 2007, 39, 775. (b) Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yin, X.; Liu, H.; Yin, G. Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1186. (c) Amadei, A.; D’Abramo, M.; Nola,
A. D.; Arcadi, A.; Cerichelli, G.; Aschi, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 434,
194. (d) James, P. V.; Sudeep, P. K.; Suresh, C. H.; Thomas, K. G. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2006, 110, 4329. (e) Haiss, W.; Wang, C.; Grace, I.; Batsanov,
A. S.; Schiffrin, D. J.; Higgins, S. J.; Bryce, M. R.; Lambert, C. J.; Nichols,
R. J. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 995. (f) Bauschlicher, C. W.; Ricca, A. Phys.
ReV. B 2005, 71, 205406.
In order to delineate the effects of H-bonding, compounds
Cary, J. M.; Moore, J. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4663. (c) Yang, X.; Brown,
A. L.; Furukawa, M.; Li, S.; Gardinier, W. E.; Bukowski, E. J.; Bright,
F. V.; Zheng, C.; Zeng, X. C.; Gong, B. Chem. Commun. 2003, 56. (d)
Yang, X.; Yuan, L.; Yamato, K.; Brown, A. L.; Feng, W.; Furukawa, M.;
Zeng, X. C.; Gong, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3148.
(8) (a) Crisp, G. T.; Bubner, T. P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 11899. (b)
McFarland, S. A.; Finney, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1178. (c)
Brizius, G.; Billingsley, K.; Smith, M. D.; Bunz, U. H. F. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 3951. (d) Kim, J.; Swager, T. M. Nature 2001, 411, 1030. (e) Zhu, Z.;
Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9670. (f) Nesterov, E. E.;
Zhu, Z.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10083. (g) Ohira, A.;
Swager, T. M. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 19. (h) Yang, J.-S.; Yan, J.-L.;
Hwang, C.-Y.; Chiou, S.-Y.; Liau, K.-L.; Tsai, H.-H. G.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng,
S.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14109. (i) Terashima, T.; Nakashima,
(11) By carefully controlling the amount of potassium carbonate and
the reaction time, selectively cleaving one or both of the TMS groups in 5
can be achieved under respectively optimized conditions.
(12) OPEs 1-3 all have terephthalate as terminal units. Oligomers having
phenylenedihexanamide as terminal units had very low solubility in common
organic solvents or simply failed to be synthesized in a purified form due
to extremely low solubilities. Such low solubilities likely resulted from
intermolecular H-bonding formed by terminal amide groups not engaged
in intramolecular H-bonding.
(13) Similar solubility was observed among oligomers 13-15, confirm-
ing the solubility change in 1-3 is a result from planarization of the aromatic
backbone, rather than merely from the chain extension.
(14) The chemical shift of H-bonded NH only changed by ca. 0.09 ppm
as the temperature increased from 20 to 60 °C, compared to a 0.05 ppm
shift for non-hydrogen bonded NH proton and ca. 0.02 ppm shift for
aromatic protons. No significant chemical shift change was observed when
T.; Kawai, T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4195
.
(9) Extensive efforts have also been made at attaining planar structures
in oligo- and polyphenylenes; for examples of laddered polyphenylenes and
derivatives, see: (a) Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen, K. Macromol. Rapid
Commun. 2007, 28, 1676. (b) Tour, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7477.
For conformational control via noncovalent interactions, see: (c) Delnoye,
D. A. P.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8717. (d) Vetrichelvan, M.; Valiyaveettil, S.
Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5889
.
(10) (a) Kemp, D. S.; Li, Z. Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4175. (b)
2670
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 13, 2008