room temperature, the corresponding alcohol was isolated
in only 30% yield after 19 h. Thus, these arylzincs have quite
low nucleophilicity under the reaction conditions and need
to be activated for addition to aldehydes.
Table 1. Addition of the Arylzinc Generated from
m-Iodoanisole to Aldehydes in the Presence of (S)-1
Herein, we report our discovery of a catalytic process that
can not only activate the arylzincs prepared in situ from the
reaction of aryl iodides with Et2Zn for the nucleophilic
addition to aldehydes but can also provide excellent enan-
tioselectivity.
Previously, we found that the chiral 1,1′-binaphthyl
compound (S)-1, prepared in one step from (S)-H8BINOL
(5,5′,6,6′,7,7′,8,8′-octahydro-1,1′-bi-2-naphthol), was highly
enantioselective for the reaction of diphenylzinc with alde-
hydes.7 This compound was tested for the reaction of the
functional arylzincs with aldehydes. We were delighted to
find that in the presence of 10 mol % of (S)-1, the arylzinc
generated in situ from m-iodoanisole reacts with cyclohex-
anecarboxaldehyde to give the desired secondary alcohol not
only in greatly increased yield (94%) but also with very high
enantioselectivity (>99% ee). Thus, (S)-1 not only activates
the nucleophilic arylzinc addition to the aldehyde but also
has excellent stereocontrol.
Table 1 summarizes the reaction of the in situ prepared
(3-MeO-C6H4)2Zn with various aldehydes catalyzed by (S)-
1. In the presence of 10 mol % of (S)-1, the arylzinc additions
to aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes are activated. Without
(S)-1, the reactions are much slower with very low yields of
the alcohol products. For example, almost no product was
obtained for the arylzinc addition to m-nitrobenzaldehyde
in the absence of (S)-1 (entry 4). However, using (S)-1 led
to 93% yield of the desired diarylcarbinol. In addition, high
enantioselectivity (83->99% ee) was achieved for the
arylzinc addition to both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes.
In entry 8, the addition to a chiral aldehyde generated both
diastereomers in 1:1 ratio, each with over 99% ee.
Following is the general procedure used for the reactions
shown in Table 1. Under nitrogen, to a 10 mL round-bottom
flask (flame dried under vacuum) were added sequentially
Li(acac) (24 mg, 0.23 mmol, 0.25 equiv), 3-iodoanisole (238
µL, 2.0 mmoL, 2.2 equiv), and NMP (1.5 mL). This mixture
was cooled to 0 °C, and Et2Zn (115 µL, 1.1 mmoL, 1.2
equiv) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C
for 12 h to which a solution of (S)-1 (45 mg, 0.091 mmoL,
10 mol %) in THF (5 mL) was then transferred. This was
stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then warmed to room temperature.
An aldehyde (0.91 mmoL) was added, and the reaction was
monitored by TLC. Upon completion of the reaction,
ammonium chloride (saturated aqueous) was added to quench
the reaction. CH2Cl2 was used to extract the mixture three
times. The organic fractions were dried over Na2SO4 and
concentrated, and the residue was purified by flash column
a Third step. b The combined yield of both diastereomers.
chromatography on silica gel eluted with hexanes (or
petroleum ether)/ethyl acetate (0-12% ethyl acetate) to give
the alcohol product as either an oil or solid in 85 to 95%
yield. The ee’s were 83->99% determined by using HPLC:
Chiralcel OD-H column (solvent: hexanes/2-propanol). The
absolute configuration for (m-methoxyphenyl)phenylcarbinol
generated from (S)-1 was determined to be R by comparing
its optical rotation with that reported in the literature.8
Using a procedure similar to that described above, we
conducted the reaction of benzaldehyde with the arylzinc
generated in situ from methyl p-iodobenzoate and Et2Zn. As
shown in entry 1 of Table 2, this gave only low yield (47%)
and ee (67%) of the corresponding diarylcarbinol product.
Increasing the time for the arylzinc formation step at room
temperature increased the yield to 63% and the ee to 71%
(entry 2). Using Ph2Zn or Et2Zn to prepare the zinc complex
of (S)-1 as the catalyst increased the yield but decreased the
ee (entries 3,4). Increasing the amount of (S)-1 to 20 mol %
did not improve the enantioselectivity (entry 5). Changing
the solvent in the second step from THF to toluene or Et2O
(6) Kneisel, F. F.; Dochnahl, M.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1017–1021.
(7) Qin, Y.; Pu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 273–277.
(8) Kosaka, M.; Sugito, T.; Kasai, Y.; Kuwahara, S.; Watanabe, M.;
Harada, N.; Job, G. E.; Shvet, A.; Pirkle, W. H. Chirality 2003, 15, 324–
328.
2710
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 13, 2008