electron-withdrawing groups,11 while the corresponding in-
tramolecular reactions5,12 have been mostly limited to indole
derivatives5,12e and to enamines with additional activation
provided by aryl groups.12b–d Alternatively, the less nucleophilic,
as well as more stable and easier to handle, enamide-type
systems have been widely employed in a variety of synthetic
applications.2 In fact, the reactions reported here appear to be
the first examples of 5-exo-trig radical cyclizations of systems
of type 9 (R ) alkyl) not involving indole derivatives.
SCHEME 3. Heck Reactions of Tetrahydropyridines 12
The regiochemistry of these radical cyclizations follows the
trends observed with typical hex-5-enyl radicals, which are
known to cyclize with high 5-exo-trig selectivity.13,14 In addition,
in this particular case, the observed 5-exo-trig mode of addition
is also consistent with the tendency displayed by intermolecular
radical additions to unconstrained enamines, where the regio-
chemistry appears to be governed by the preservation of
conjugation. As a result, addition takes place at the enamine
ꢀ-carbon with formation of a relatively stable R-aminoalkyl
radical.11 However, 5-exo to 6-endo cyclization ratios have also
been found to be very dependent on the extent of steric
congestion around the alkene terminus. For example, for simple
model systems, the ratio 5-exo/6-endo goes from nearly 50:1
in the unsubstituted hex-5-enyl radical to approximately 1:2 in
the 5-methylhex-5-enyl case.13,14 Therefore, in the cyclizations
of sterically encumbered enamines 12 the driving force provided
by the formation of an R-aminoradical 15 is remarkable,
particularly in the more substituted cases of 12b-d.
in the reaction of electron-rich-substituted phenyl derivative 12d,
and this could also be related to the use of that halide-scavenger
additive.17 Thus, in the presence of Tl(I) a cationic pathway is
presumably involved17 and, in that case, addition of the electron-
rich aryl group to the more electron-deficient R-carbon is
expected to be particularly favorable.18 Formation of both 16
and 17 took place with very high stereoselectivity since no other
stereoisomers were found. The stereochemistry of 16 and 17
was unambiguously established by NOE experiments and is
consistent with a reaction course involving carbopalladation
from the less hindered face of the enamine double bond,
followed by ꢀ-H elimination with the exocyclic methylene unit.
In conclusion, starting from readily available aldehydes 2 and
amine 11, the tactical combination of a condensation step and
either a radical- or Heck-type ring-closure provides a rapid build-
up of molecular complexity in a regiodivergent and very
stereoselective manner. The different regiochemistries displayed
by the radical and Pd-catalyzed reactions make the two methods
complementary, a feature also recognized in earlier work.7
Additionally, the presence of a lactone ring in 13 and 16 is
particularly convenient as it offers further possibilities for
structural diversification.1b It is noted, however, that simpler
tetrahydropyridines 3 (EWG ) CO2Et) are similarly available
from acyclic R,ꢀ-unsaturated esters.1a All of these combined
features contribute to make the methodology appealing for the
preparation of structurally diverse families of polycylic nitrogen
heterocycles.
The reactivity of enamines 12c,d under typical Heck condi-
tions was examined next. Ample precedent existed on the use
of enamides, formamidines, enaminones, enaminoesters, dehy-
droaminoesters, pyrroles, and indoles, which have all been
extensively utilized in intramolecular Heck reactions.3,6,15
However, reports on the alternative use of simple enamines are
very scarce and, in any case, restricted to 5-endo additions at
the enamine ꢀ-position.15c,16 After some experimentation, condi-
tions which led efficiently to intramolecular arylation products
were found (Scheme 3). The major products 16 displayed an
alkene moiety exocyclic to the piperidine ring, and were
accompanied by minor amounts of double bond isomerization
products 17. The use of TlOAc as additive was found to be
important to minimize this isomerization,7b,c,17 as shown by the
increased amount of 17c (16c/17c ) 1.4:1, 52%) obtained when
TlOAc was replaced by KOAc under otherwise similar condi-
tions. Additionally, a significantly higher efficiency was noticed
Experimental Section
General Procedure for the Preparation of Tetrahydropy-
ridines 12. In a typical experiment, to a solution of amine 111b,8
(0.402 g, 1.98 mmol) and the appropriate aldehyde 2 in CH2Cl2
(24 mL) was added powdered 4 Å molecular sieves (4.0 g), and
the resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 14 h.
The mixture was filtered over Celite and the solid was washed with
CH2Cl2 (3 × 15 mL). Evaporation of the combined filtrates afforded
an oil that was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel saturated
with Et3N) under the conditions indicated in the Supporting
Information for the individual cases.
General Procedure for Radical Cyclizations of Tetrahydropy-
ridines 12: Preparation of Azaspirocycles 13. In a typical experi-
ment, a solution of 12 (1.0 mmol), AIBN (0.164 g, 0.30 mmol),
and (TMS)3SiH (616 µL, 2.0 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was heated
at 100 °C (oil bath temperature) for 16 h under Ar. After cooling,
the mixture was either diluted with EtOAc (15 mL) and extracted
with 1 M HCl (4 × 20 mL) (in the case of 12a and 12b) or,
alternatively, evaporated to dryness, then the resulting residue was
redissolved in EtOAc (20 mL) and extracted with 1 M HCl (3 ×
15 mL) (in the case of 12c and 12d). In either case, the acidic
extracts were basified with saturated NaHCO3 to pH 8, the solution
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 25 mL), and the organic extracts
were washed with brine (10 mL) and dried (Na2SO4). The residue
after evaporation was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel
saturated with Et3N) under the conditions indicated in the Sup-
porting Information for the individual cases.
(12) (a) Glover, S. A.; Warkentin, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2115–2121.
(b) Cladingboel, D. E.; Parson, P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 1543–
1544. (c) Ozlu, Y.; Cladingboel, D. E.; Parsons, P. J. Synlett 1993, 357–358. (d)
Oezlue, Y.; Cladingboel, D. E.; Parsons, P. J. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2183–
2206. (e) Tanino, H.; Fukuishi, K.; Ushiyama, M.; Okada, K. Tetrahedron 2004,
60, 3273–3282.
(13) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Schiesser, C. H. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3925–3941.
(14) Beckwith, A. L. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1993, 22, 143–151.
(15) Recent examples: (a) Sorensen, U. S.; Pombo-Villar, E. HelV. Chim.
Acta 2004, 87, 82–89. (b) Wu, X.; Nilsson, P.; Larhed, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 346–349. (c) Lachance, N.; April, M.; Joly, M.-A. Synthesis 2005, 2571–
2577. (d) Michael, J. P.; de Koning, C. B.; Mudzunga, T. T.; Petersen, R. L.
Synlett 2006, 3284–3288.
(16) Ackermann, L.; Althammer, A. Synlett 2006, 3125–3129.
(17) Cabri, W.; Candiani, I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 2–7.
5196 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 13, 2008