B. Amorelli et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 2944–2947
2947
T. J.; Khan, A. R.; Cao, Z.; Robbins, P. W.; James, M. N.
G.; Triggs-Raine, B. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 19618;
(d) Drouillard, S.; Armand, S.; Davies, G. J.; Vorgias, C.
E.; Henrissat, B. Biochem. J. 1997, 328, 945.
unfavorable polar interaction. In particular, the portion
of the enzyme active site near the anomeric carbon and
the scissile bond, which must normally accommodate
the aglycon upon initial binding of the substrate, evi-
dently cannot accommodate bulky substituents at the
anomeric carbon when introduced in the context of
the GalNAc-thiazoline inhibitors. This is presumably a
consequence of the tightness of the enzyme binding
pocket surrounding the pseudo-equatorial C-1 b-substi-
tuent, which is H in the case of the best inhibitors 1a and
1b.
2. Gravel, R. A.; Clark, J. T. R.; Kaback, M. M.; Mahuran,
D.; Sandhoff, K.; Suzuki, K. In The Metabolic Basis of
Inherited Disease; Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W.
S., Valle, D., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1995; p
1807.
3. Mark, B. L.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Knapp, S.; Triggs-Raine, B.
L.; Withers, S. G.; James, M. N. G. J. Biol. Chem. 2001,
276, 10330.
4. (a) Macauley, M. S.; Whitworth, G. E.; Debowski, A. W.;
Chin, D.; Vocadlo, D. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25313;
(b) Tropak, M. B.; Blanchard, J. E.; Withers, S. G.;
Brown, E. D.; Mahuran, D. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 153.
5. (a) Torres, C. R.; Hart, G. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259,
3308; (b) Wells, L.; Vosseller, K.; Hart, G. W. Science
2001, 291, 2376; (c) Hanover, J. A. FASEB J. 2001, 15,
1865; Bacterial OGA (d) Dorfmueller, H. C.; Borodkin, V.
S.; Schimpl, M.; Shepherd, S. M.; Shpiro, N. A.; van
Aalten, D. M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16484.
6. (a) Macauley, M. S.; Whitworth, G. E.; Debowski, A. W.;
Chin, D.; Vocadlo, D. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25313;
(b) Cetinbas, N.; Macauley, M. S.; Stubbs, K. A.;
Drapala, R.; Vocadlo, D. J. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 3835.
7. (a) Lienhard, G. E. Science 1973, 180, 149; (b) Wolfenden,
R. Nature 1969, 223, 704; (c) Mader, M. M.; Bartlett, P. A.
Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1281.
Acknowledgements
We thank NIH (AI055760) for partial financial support,
and Rutgers University for a Reid graduate fellowship
to B.A. The work at UBC was supported by the Cana-
dian Institutes for Health Research, the Natural Science
and Engineering Research Council, and the University
of British Columbia. We thank Dr. Brian Patrick and
David Vocadlo at UBC for determining the 3-dimen-
sional structure of 1b.
Supplementary data
8. Wicki, J.; Williams, S. J.; Withers, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 4530.
Experimental procedures and copies of spectra for new
compounds. Crystallographic data (excluding structure
factors) for the structures in this paper have been depos-
ited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
as Supplementary Publication No. CCDC 678775. Sup-
plementary data associated with this article can be
9. Whitworth, G. E.; Macauley, M. S.; Stubbs, K. A.;
Dennis, R. J.; Taylor, E. J.; Davies, G. J.; Greig, I. R.;
Vocadlo, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 635.
10. Knapp, S.; Abdo, M.; Ajayi, K.; Huhn, R. A.; Emge, T. J.;
Kim, E. J.; Hanover, J. A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2321.
11. Mark, B. L.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Zhao, D.; Knapp, S.;
Withers, S. G.; James, M. N. G. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276,
42131.
12. Knapp, S.; Yang, C.; Haimowitz, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 7101.
References and notes
13. Knapp, S.; Amorelli, B.; Doss, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 8507.
14. Knapp, S.; Myers, D. S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2995.
15. Knapp, S.; Myers, D. S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3636.
16. Shioiri, T.; Ninomiya, K.; Yamada, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 6203.
1. (a) Tews, I.; Perrakis, A.; Oppenheim, A.; Dauter, Z.;
Wilson, K. S.; Vorgias, C. E. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 3,
638; (b) Tews, I.; Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. C.;
Perrakis, A.; Wilson, K. S.; Dijkstra, B. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 7954; (c) Mark, B. L.; Wasney, G. A.; Salo,