AKLRFGCPSRHWKFL-NH2 (1),[14] with the anticipated one-step
formation of a thioester: H-AKLRFG-SR (2). The reasons for se-
lecting peptide 1 were based on Aimoto’s experimental results,
in which a cysteinyl prolyl ester afforded peptide thioesters.[9]
However, subjecting peptide 1 to the nickel(II)-mediated reac-
tion failed to afford thioester 2.[15]
Table 1. Nickel(II)-mediated conversion of 5a to oxyesters.
We speculated that one possible reason for the failure was
related to the presence of the cysteinyl residue close to the
nickel(II)-bound active complex. We therefore examined the
hydrolysis of a peptide, H-AKLRFGAPSRHWKFL-NH2 (3), with
alanine substituted for cysteine. Although the nickel(II)-mediat-
ed hydrolysis of 3 (100 mm NiCl2, 508C, pH 8.2) did not go to
completion even after 48 h, we found that the reaction in the
presence of 0.2m tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) af-
forded a small amount of a Tris adduct, H-AKLRFGAP-Tris (4),
on the processed N-peptide, the N-terminal half of the cleaved
peptide (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). It is
worth noting that an appropriate oxygen nucleophile has
a good chance of being involved in the nucleophilic conver-
sion of the serine-isopeptide intermediate to the correspond-
ing oxyester via OÀO intermolecular acyl transfer. This suggest-
ed the feasibility of a stepwise conversion of an SRHW-contain-
ing peptide to a thioester through an oxyester. We therefore
next used Ac-LYRAASRHWKFL-NH2 (5a), which has a more
scissile alanyl–serine linkage, to examine the conversion to an
oxyester.
Entry
Conditions[a]
NiCl2 [mm]
Nucleophile
FC[b]
pH
[d]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
10
10
10
10
1
20
10
10
10
1
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
7.8
8.6
8.2
8.2
8.2
50% (v/v) TFE
–
–
[d]
50% (v/v) iPrOH
10% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
50% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
30% (v/v) MeOH
0.44
0.70
0.72
0.69
0.68
0.61
0.53
0.43
0.59
0.65
9
10[c]
11
12
10
[a] Reactions were performed in 0.2m HEPES buffer at 378C for 12 h in
the presence of 1 mm of 5a. [b] The fraction converted (FC) was deter-
mined by HPLC separation and integration (integ.) of 8a (or 9) as a frac-
tion of the sum of the integration of unreacted 5a+hydrolyzed 6a+8a
(or 9). [c] In the presence of 6m Gn·HCl. [d] Oxyesters were not obtained.
Standard hydrolysis reaction of 5a in 0.2m 2-[4-(2-hy-
droxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer
(pH 8.2) in the presence of 10 mm nickel(II) chloride at 378C
went to completion within 12 hours to give the corresponding
hydrolyzed peptides, Ac-LYRAA-OH (6a) and H-SRHWKFL-NH2
(7). Based on these hydrolysis conditions, the nickel(II)-mediat-
ed conversion of 5a to the corresponding oxyester in the pres-
ence of alcohols was examined (Table 1). The use of trifluoroe-
thanol (TFE) or propan-2-ol as a nucleophile failed to yield the
corresponding oxyester. However, methanol participated in the
nucleophilic attack to yield the methyl ester peptide,
Ac-LYRAA-OMe (8a). The fraction converted increased with in-
creasing methanol concentration (entries 3–5 Table 1). Across
the nickel(II) concentration range (1–20 mm), no significant dif-
ferences were observed (entries 4, 6 and 7 in Table 1). Metha-
nolysis at pH 8.2 gave the best result (entries 4, 8 and 9 in
Table 1).[16] The nickel(II)-mediated reaction tolerated the pres-
ence of guanidine hydrochloride (Gn·HCl), although the frac-
tion converted decreased (entry 10 in Table 1). Conversion to
OÀS acyl-transfer step under acidic conditions using an alterna-
tively synthesized l-alanine-containing peptide.[20]
To develop an alternative methodology to the OÀS acyl-
transfer step, we focused on an innovative protocol involving
a peptide hydrazide/azide, reported by Liu and co-workers.[21]
As such, we next examined thioester synthesis from methyl
ester 8a using hydrazide/azide. The nickel(II)-mediated alcohol-
ysis of 5a (0.2m HEPES, 10 mm NiCl2, 50% (v/v) MeOH, pH 8.2,
378C, for 12 h), followed by addition of hydrazine monohy-
drate (NH2NH2·H2O) to the reaction mixture (final concentra-
tion: 5% (v/v) NH2NH2·H2O) with additional reaction for 1 hour
at 258C, gave the peptide hydrazide, Ac-LYRAA-NHNH2 (11 a),
in 80% isolated yield.[22] Furthermore, the resulting 11 a was
converted to the corresponding sodium mercaptoethanesulfo-
nate (MESNa) thioester, Ac-LYRAA-SCH2CH2SO3Na (13a), using
Liu’s conditions via the peptide azide, Ac-LYRAA-N3 (12a), and
no epimerization was observed in the sequence of reactions.[23]
We named this thioesterification system SQAT, because the
thioesters were produced by sequential quadruple acyl transfer
(NÀO, OÀO, OÀN, and NÀS acyl transfers) as shown in
Scheme 2.
a
dithiodiethyl (DTDE; HOCH2CH2S-SCH2CH2OH) oxyester,
Ac-LYRAA-OCH2CH2S-SCH2CH2OH (9), also proceeded (en-
tries 11 and 12 in Table 1). Here, DTDE was selected due to the
anticipation of the OÀS acyl-transfer-mediated conversion of
the DTDE oxyester to a thioester.[4] Among several attempts to
achieve conversion to the thioesters,[17] the use of 0.1% (v/v)
trifluoromethanesulfonic acid/5% (v/v) para-thiocresol in tri-
fluoroacetic acid successfully converted 9 to the corresponding
methylphenyl thioester, Ac-LYRAA-SPh(4-Me) (10), via
a tandem thiol switch.[18,19] However, this procedure is accom-
panied by the formation of a considerable amount of alanine-
epimerized peptide. The origin of this was shown to be an
These results encouraged us to examine the applicability of
the protocol to the 20 other naturally occurring amino acids
(X)–serine junctions in Ac-LYRAXSRHWKFL-NH2 (5) (Table 2).
Several X-SRHW sequences were proven to be potential sites
for thioester synthesis.
The feasibility of preparing thioesters using the SQAT system
was confirmed by NCL-mediated syntheses of C-type and A-
type natriuretic peptides (CNP and ANP, 53- and 28- residue
naturally occurring peptides, respectively). For the preparation
ChemistryOpen 2015, 4, 448 – 452
449
ꢀ 2015 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim