extensively for peptide mimetic studies.2 However, the
bioactive conformation of biologically active peptides, such
as peptide ligands targeting a G protein-coupled receptor
(GPCR), is usually unclear. In these cases, a series of
cyclopropane-containing amino acids with stereochemical
diversity, where the side chains are located in a variety of
spatial arrangements owing to the conformational restriction,
can be used to identify the bioactive conformation and to
develop peptide mimetics with high potency.
Figure 1. Structures of belactosin A (3) and its cis-cyclopropane
stereoisomer (4).
We describe here an efficient synthetic method for a series
of chiral 2,3- and 3,4-methanoamino acid equivalents III
(Scheme 1) with cis/trans, D/L, and syn/anti stereochemical
equivalents of L- or D-2,3- and -3,4-methanoamino acids IV,
since a vinyl group is stable under various reaction conditions
and can be converted easily into a carboxyl group.7 Com-
pounds III would be derived from compounds II, the
symmetric CH2dCHC*H(NH)- moiety of which would be
constructed via the diastereoselective Grignard addition to
the (R)- and (S)-t-butanesulfinyl imines I.8 Grignard additions
to the t-butanesulfinyl imines are known to occur highly
stereoselectively, where the stereochemical outcome is
dependent on the configuration at the sulfinyl moiety.8
Scheme 1
Table 1. Grignard Reaction of (S)-t-Butanesulfinyl Imine 6
diversity. Using these equivalents, we synthesized belactosin
A (3),4,5 a tripeptidic proteasome inhibitor containing a
3-(trans-2-aminocyclopropyl)-L-alanine (trans-3,4-methano-
L-ornithine), and its cis-cyclopropane stereoisomer 4 (Figure
1). The biological evaluation showed that the unnatural cis-
isomer 4 is a more potent proteasome inhibitor than the
natural belactosin A having the trans-cyclopropane structure.
The stereoselective synthesis of cyclopropane derivatives
with a desired stereochemistry is often troublesome.2,3,6 To
solve this problem, we recently developed chiral units
composed of four stereoisomeric cyclopropanes, 1 and 2,
and their enantiomers ent-1 and ent-2 (Scheme 1), for
preparing various cyclopropane derivatives bearing adjacent
carbon substituents in a cis or a trans relationship.3a These
units were employed as synthons in this study.
d
entrya,b
temp (°C)
conc (M)c
yield (%)
D/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
rt
rt
rt
rt
110
110
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.01
quant
quant
quant
97
98
94
1:4.6
1:6.7
1:5.1
1:7.4
1:10
1:8.1
1:16
quant
a Solvent: entries 1 and 2, CH2Cl2; entry 3, THF; entries 4-7, toluene.
b Equivalent of Grignard reagent: entries 1-5, 3 equiv; entry 6, 1.5 equiv;
entry 7, 1.1 equiv. c Concentration of the substrate. D or L indicates the
d
stereochemistry of the cyclopropane amino acid by replacing the vinyl group
of the Grignard reaction product with a carboxyl, and the ratio was
determined by HPLC.
We designed the cyclopropane derivatives III with a
CH2dCHC*H(NHPg)- side chain (Scheme 1) as versatile
We investigated the Grignard reaction using a series of (R)-
and (S)-t-butanesulfinyl imines 6-13 with a cis- or trans-
cyclopropane structure (Tables 1 and 2).9 The trans-cyclopro-
pane t-butanesulfinyl imines 6-9 were prepared from the chiral
trans-cyclopropane unit 1 (Scheme 2). Similarly, the cis-
(4) (a) Asai, A.; Hasegawa, A.; Ochiai, K.; Yamashita, Y.; Mizukami,
T. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 81–83. (b) Asai, A.; Tsujita, T.; Sharma, S. V.;
Yamashita, Y.; Akinaga, S.; Funakoshi, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Mizukami, T.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 67, 227–234
.
(5) Total synthesis of belactosin A: (a) Armstrong, A.; Scutt, J, N. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 510–511. (b) Larionov, O. V.; de Meijere, A. Org. Lett.
(8) (a) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Kim, K.; Backes, B. J.; Ellman, J. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8011–8019. (b) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Ellman,
J. A. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8883–8904. (c) Davis, F. A.; McCoull, W. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3396–3397. (d) Senanayake, C. H.; Krishnamurthy,
D.; Lu, A.-H.; Han, Z.; Gallou, I. Aldrichimica Acta 2005, 38, 93–104.
(9) Stereochemistries of the Grignard reaction products were determined
by the modified Mosher method.
2004, 6, 2153–2156
.
(6) For examples see: (a) Stammer, C. H. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2231–
2254. (b) Kodama, H.; Shimohigashi, Y. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1994,
52, 180–191. (c) Shimamoto, K.; Ohfune, Y. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 407–
¨
423. (d) Demir, A. S.; Sesenoglu, O HelV. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 106–119,
and references therein
(7) Cooper, T. S.; Laurent, P.; Moody, C. J.; Takle, A. K. Org. Biol.
.
(10) (a) Adamas, J. Nat. ReV. Cancer 2004, 4, 349–360. (b) Ciechanover,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5944–5996.
Chem. 2004, 2, 265–267
.
3572
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 16, 2008