Table 1. Screening of various l3-iodanes and Lewis acids in RICR reac-
Therefore, we shifted our efforts to investigate the effect of
aromatic substituents on this RICR reaction, with the hope
that variation of the steric and electronic nature of the l3-io-
danes may favor [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement over re-
ductive elimination.
tions.[a]
Accordingly, iodoarene diacetates 1b–i, containing either
an electron-donating or an electron-withdrawing group,
were screened in the RICR reaction by using standard ex-
perimental conditions (allyltrimethylsilane, BF3·Et2O,
CH2Cl2, À258C, 2 h; Table 1, entries 9–16). These experi-
ments led to the identification of a very promising substrate,
3-methoxyiodobenzene diacetate 1 f, which reacted with al-
lyltrimethylsilane to provide a mixture of 4-allyl-3-iodoani-
sole 4 f, 2-allyl-3-iodoanisole 5 f, and 3-iodoanisole 6 f (4 f/
5 f/6 f=3.8:0.9:1; Table 1, entry 13), whereas reactions in-
volving the other IIII-containing compounds (1b–e and 1g–i)
produced the corresponding iodoarene 6 as the major prod-
uct. It is worth noting that neither 2-methoxyiodobenzene
diacetate 1e nor 4-methoxyiodobenzene diacetate 1g pro-
duced a significant amount of the corresponding ortho-ally-
liodoarene products (Table 1, entries 12 and 14). 3-Methylio-
dobenzene diacetate 1c gave an improved result over the
parent iodobenzene diacetate 1a (Table 1, entry 10), where-
as 2-methyl- and 4-methyliodobenzene diacetates (1b and
1d) produced comparable results to the parent iodobenzene
diacetate 1a (Table 1, entries 9 and 11). In addition, l3-io-
danes 1h and 1i, containing 3-trifluoromethyl- and 3-bromo-
substituents provided only a trace amount of the desired
products, although this was not completely unexpected
(Table 1, entries 15 and 16). These studies indicated that an
electron-donating group at the meta-position is required to
favor the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement reaction. In addi-
tion, 3-methoxyiodosylbenzene (9), prepared by alkaline hy-
drolysis[21] of 1 f, gave a comparable experimental outcome
to 1 f (Table 1, entry 17). However, the use of 3-methoxy-
Entry
l3-Iodanes
Lewis acid
Ratio
(4/5/6)[b]
Yield
[%][c]
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
1[7]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
7
7
7
7
7
7
1a
8
1b
1c
1d
1e
1 f
1g
1h
1i
9
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
none
SnCl4
TiCl4
not reported
(36)
n.d.
0
0
0
0.24:0:1[d]
–
–
–
–
ZnCl2
0
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
BF3·Et2O
0.1:0:1[d]
0.2:0:1[e]
0.17:0:1[e]
0.32:0.22:1
0.08:0:1[g]
–
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
80[f]
n.d.
trace
68 (55)
trace
trace
trace
65 (52)
n.d.
3.8:0.9:1
–
–
–
4.5:1.1:1
1.4:0.4:1
10
[a] Reaction conditions: [bisACHTNUTRGNEUNG(acetoxy)iodo]arene (0.6 mmol), allyltrime-
1
thylsilane (0.9 mmol), Lewis acid (0.72 mmol). [b] Estimated by H NMR
analysis of the crude products. [c] Combined isolated yield of regioisom-
ers 4 and 5. The isolated yield of major isomer 4 is reported in parenthe-
ses. n.d.=not determined. [d] Ratio of ortho-allyliodobenzene 4a to iodo-
benzene 6a. [e] Ratio of 2-allyl-6-methyliodobenzene 4b to 2-methylio-
dobenzene 6b. [f] Combined isolated yield of 4c, 5c and 6c. [g] Ratio of
2-allyl-4-methyliodobenzene 4d to 4-methyliodobenzene 6d.
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
(bis(trifluoroacetoxy)iodo)benzene (10)[22] provided an infe-
rior result (Table 1, entry 18), probably because the strongly
electron-withdrawing nature of trifluoroacetate promotes
the reductive elimination reaction. Therefore, iodoarene di-
acetates will be prepared and studied in the RICR reactions
because they are more readily available and more stable
than their iodosylarene counterparts.
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(phenyl)iodoniumACHTUNGTRENNUNG(III) complex (see 2), a reaction that com-
petes with the reductive iodonio-Claisen rearrangement. If
so, acceleration of the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement or
suppression of reductive elimination should favor formation
of ortho-allyliodobenzene 4a. It is well-known that a related
pericyclic reaction, the Claisen rearrangement, can be accel-
erated by electron-withdrawing or electron-donating sub-
stituents.[15] In addition, the anionic oxy–Cope rearrange-
ment was found to be approximately 1010 to 1017 times faster
than the neutral oxy–Cope rearrangement,[16] probably be-
Because 3-methoxyiodobenzene diacetate 1 f was identi-
fied as a promising substrate for this RICR reaction, further
optimization of the reaction conditions was carried out by
using this substrate (Table 2). Our investigations resulted in
the discovery that acetonitrile is a superior solvent for this
rearrangement, which significantly increased the proportion
of the ortho-allyliodoarenes (4 f and 5 f) formed relative to
iodoarene 6 f (Table 2, entry 2). Presumably, acetonitrile sta-
bilizes the iodoniumACTHNUTRGNE(NUG III) species (see 2, Scheme 1) through
cause of weakening of the adjacent C C bond by the
coordination[23] to the iodine center and thus suppresses the
reductive elimination reaction. Lowering the temperature
also slightly improved the reaction outcome (Table 2,
entry 5). Further optimization led to the discovery that
using a mixed solvent (CH2Cl2/CH3CN (1:1), À508C) pro-
vided the optimal reaction conditions, under which the de-
À
oxygen anion, as suggested by the density functional theory
(DFT) calculations.[17] Furthermore, the introduction of a
thioalkoxy group on the C4 or C6 position[18,19] or additional
unsaturated substituents on the terminal position has been
found to accelerate anionic oxy–Cope rearrangements.[20]
&
2
&
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!