.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 2: The reaction of 1a or 4a with various sulfonyl azides under
optimal reaction conditions.
amine in the substrate since previous mechanistic studies have
proved the necessity of a tertiary amine for N-sulfonyl
ketenime formation.[15] The novelty of both the reaction
itself and the structure of 2a motivated us to carry out further
investigations on path a.
Efforts to improve the selectivity by changing the reaction
medium and the copper(I) source were not fruitful (entries 1–
4, Table 1). Reactions carried out in tetrahydrofuran (THF),
Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions for the metal-catalyzed
reaction of 1a with TsN3.[a]
Entry
Cat.
Base
Solvent
Yield [%][b]
3a/2a
1
2
3
4
5
CuTc
CuTc
CuTc
CuI
none
none
none
none
DIPEA
(1 equiv)
DIPEA
(3 equiv)
DIPEA
(5 equiv)
Et3N
toluene
CH2Cl2
THF
THF
THF
84
1.0:1.1
1.0:1.1
1.0:1.2
1.0:1.5
1.0:3.0
85
Mbs=p-methoxybenzenesulfonyl, Mts=mesitylenesulfonyl, Nos=4-
nitrobenzenesulfonyl, PMB=para-methoxybenzyl, SES=2-[(trimethyl)-
ethyl]sulfonyl.
86[c]
87
CuI
65
6
7
CuI
CuI
THF
THF
82
88
1.0:12
0:1.0
temperature using CuI (5 mol%) as the catalyst and anhy-
drous THF as the solvent.
The impact of the sulfonyl azide on this reaction was
inspected under the optimal reaction conditions (Table 2).
Sulfonyl azides with different electronic and steric properties
reacted with the benzylamino enyne 1a or p-methoxybenzyl-
amino enyne 4a to form the corresponding six- or five-
membered cyclic amidines reliably in excellent yields.
Replacement of the benzyl group in 1a or the p-
methoxybenzyl moiety in 4a with other substituents resulted
in an array of substrates (1b–f and 4b–i, Table 3), which were
subjected to the optimal reaction conditions. The electronic
nature of the para substituent on the benzyl group has
a negligible effect, if any, on the reaction yield. Substrates
with either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups
gave more than 90% yields (2b–e; 10a–e). Other N-alkyl
groups such as the carboethoxymethyl and hexyl groups
provided almost equally high yields (2 f, 10 f–g), thus demon-
strating the scope of compatible N-alkyl substituents. Inter-
estingly, the benzyl amine 4i, bearing an ortho-hydroxy group,
unlike the prototype 1a, does not react at room temperature
without an external base, however, it proceeds smoothly at
608C to produce the non-aza-Claisen product 10i in 86%
yield. We assumed that intramolecular hydrogen bonding
masks the basic nitrogen center at low temperature and 10i is
formed by 1,4-elimination of o-quinone methide[16] (13) from
the cyclized zwitterion IV4i (Figure 3a). Removal of this
interaction by acylation of the phenolic group brought 4h
back into the desired reaction manifold.
8
9
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuTc
Cu(OTf)2
AgOTf
CuI
CuI
CuI
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
CHCl3
toluene
DMSO
MeCN
tBuOH
CH2Cl2
76
78
78
75
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
0:1.0
Py
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2,6-lutidine
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
DIPEA
69[d]
38[e]
73
72
70
74
68
CuI
CuI
CuI
83
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 equiv, 0.1m), TsN3 (1.1 equiv), DIPEA,
and metal catalyst (5 mol%) were stirred in solvent at RT for half an hour.
[b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Reaction performed at 608C. [d] Recov-
ered 25% starting material. [e] Complex reaction mixture. DMSO=di-
methyl sulfoxide, THF=tetrahydrofuran, Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl.
CH2Cl2, and toluene all gave 2a and 3a, largely in equal
amounts, and catalysis by CuI instead of CuTc slightly favored
path a (entry 4). The use of higher temperature did not afford
a significant change (entry 3). As expected, the introduction
of an external organic base shifts the reaction course to path a
substantially (entries 5–10), and the use of 5 equivalents of
base completely excluded the formation of 3a. While other
organic bases function well, diisopropylethyl amine (DIPEA)
proved to be the best in terms of the yield. Several other
catalysts were tested under these reaction conditions but were
found to be inferior to CuI. For example, 5 mol% Cu(OTf)2 is
not sufficient for full conversion of the starting material and
AgOTf delivered a complex reaction mixture (entries 11–13).
Although THF is the optimum solvent among those tested,
the reaction tolerates various types of solvent, even with
nucleophilic DMSO and tert-butyl alcohol offering 70 and
68% yield, respectively. The current optimal reaction con-
ditions involve reacting the enyne 1 with the sulfonyl azide
(1.1 equiv) in the presence of DIPEA (5.0 equiv) at room
Next, variations on the allyl segment were examined, thus
leading to the discovery that substitution on each of the three
positions is well tolerated with respect to yields (1g–m!2g–
m; 4j–l!10j–l, Table 3) as clean reactions and high yields
were obtained without exception (85–95%). Normally diffi-
cult quaternary carbon centers are constructed with ease by
this method (10j–k, 2g). Substrates of bis(allyl) amino enynes
such as 1l and 1m raise the issue of chemoselectivity. The fact
that almost equal amounts of the cyclic amidines 2l and 2l’
were obtained indicates that conjugation to the ester carbonyl
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!