simultaneously with the retro-cycloaddition reaction. For 1a
and 1b both processes take place, and the result (by HPLC)
is the formation of compound 2 and C60 in an almost 1:1
ratio (see Supporting Information). The behavior observed
for 1d resembles that observed for C-aryl-N-(4-nitrophenyl)-
2-pyrazolino[60]fullerenes, where only the retro-cycloaddi-
tion process was detected. Derivative 1c, which lacks the
allylic hydrogen, gives the highest efficiency for the retro-
cycloaddition process (96%).
weak interactions that contribute to stabilize the supramo-
lecular network. Hydrogen bonds (C-H···O-N) between
nitro and formyl groups (d ) 2.377 Å) and π-π stacking
between p-NO2-phenyl units (d ) 3.095 Å) led to the
formation of fullerene dimers in the crystal (Figure 3).
In order to shed some light on the allylic-type oxidation
process, we carried out a number of experiments under
different conditions. Thus, using the same protocol described
above, derivative 1a was stirred with a catalytic amount (6
% w/w) of copper triflate in refluxing o-DCB for 24 h. HPLC
analysis showed that compound 1a did not undergo any
oxidative process under these conditions, and only the
thermal retro-cycloaddition was observed.
It is worth mentioning that no other catalyst except for
copper(II) triflate such as CuCl2, Cu(OAc)2, KTf, or LaTf3
with different anions or metalic cations afforded aldehyde 2
(HPLC) (see Supporting Information).
Interestingly, reaction of compound 1a under standard
conditions in argon atmosphere and using dry o-DCB (dried
over calcium hydride) as solvent led to the formation of only
aldehyde 2, and no evidence of compound 3 was observed.
This result allowed us to conclude that atmospheric oxygen
could play a role in the oxidation of the double bond on the
fullerene cage to form 3.
We performed new experiments with 1a and 1b under
argon atmosphere in order to fully characterize the isolated
aldehyde 2. Both reactions were monitored by HPLC, and
evolution of the process revealed the competition between
the oxidation and retro-cycloaddition reactions. Once the
reaction was completed (by HPLC), we isolated compound
2 and carried out its full structural characterization. Analysis
by X-ray diffraction of a single crystal obtained by slow
diffusion of hexane vapor into a solution of 1a in chloroben-
zene5 evidenced the chemical structure of compound 2, where
the formyl group is responsible for the existence of different
Figure 3.
X-ray crystal structure of 2:5 (A) π-π stacking
interactions and (B) hydrogen bond interactions.
A plausible explanation for the formation of aldehyde 2
is that the oxidation of 1a and 1b takes place through
coordination of copper either to the N sp2 or the CdN in
the 2-pyrazole ring and to a neighbor CdC of the C60
sphere.6 Although the mechanism of this oxidation is not
yet clear, copper(II) triflate is the reagent that produces the
oxidation by assisting the allylic-type oxidation through the
formation of Cu/O complexes, which upon formation un-
dergo a rapid decomposition to yield compound 2.7 To the
best of our knowledge, this unexpected reaction represents
the first example of an allylic-type oxidation accomplished
in the presence of copper(II) triflate, without using classical
oxidants.8
(5) Crystal data: C68H5N3O3·1.5(C6H5Cl), Mr ) 1080.07, red thin plate
(0.6 × 0.6 × 0.04 mm3), triclinic, space group P-1, a ) 9.9093(8) Å, b
) 10.0293(8) Å, c ) 24.979(2) Å, R ) 80.616(2)°, ꢀ ) 85.699(1)°, γ )
62.232(1)°, V ) 2167.2(3) Å3, Z ) 2, Fcalcd ) 1.655 g cm-3, F(000) )
1089, µ ) 0.191 mm-1, 2θmax ) 50.0°, T ) 296(2) K, 7567 unique
reflections [R(int) ) 0.1106], R1 ) 0.0510, wR2 ) 0.1454 (all data),
GOF(F2) ) 0.957, N0/NV ) 7567/769, highest residual electron density
1.289 e Å-3. X-ray diffraction data were measured on a Bruker Smart CCD
diffractometer, with graphite-monochromated Mo-KR radiation (λ )
0.71073 Å) operating at 50 kV and 35 mA. The intensity data were collected
over a hemisphere of the reciprocal space by combination of three exposure
sets. Each exposure of 20 s covered 0.3 in ω. Reflection range for the data
collection were 1.65° < θ < 25.0°. The first 100 frames were recollected
at the end of the data collection to monitor crystal decay, and no appreciable
decay was observed. Structure solution and refinement: The structure was
solved by direct methods. The refinement was done by full matrix least-
squares procedures on F2 (SHELXTL version 5.1). The non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atoms were calculated at their
geometrical positions and refined as riding on their respective carbon atoms
except H2 bonded to C2 atom (from formyl group) which was located from
Fourier synthesis difference and the coordinates were refined. CCDC 687339
contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data
html (or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road,
Cambridge CB21EZ, UK; fax (+44)1223-336-033; or deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
To improve the allylic-type oxidation, we carried out the
reaction of 1a with SeO2 as a classical reagent used in related
allylic oxidations. Compound 1a was heated at reflux in the
presence of an excess of selenium dioxide under argon
atmosphere, and the reaction was monitored by HPLC. In
this case, the reaction was completed in 24 h, and almost no
retro-cycloaddition was detected, thus forming compound 2
in 60% yield.
(6) To shed light on the influence of the fullerene unit, we performed
the same experiments on a similar 2-pyrazolino-based molecule, 3-methyl-
1-phenylpyrazole without the fullerene moiety. TLC analysis of reaction
of this compound with copper(II) triflate in o-DCB at reflux for 2 days
revealed that this derivative does not undergo any oxidation process.
(7) (a) For a review, see: Gamez, P.; Aubel, P. G.; Driessen, W. L.;
Reedijk, J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2001, 30, 376. (b) Maiti, D.; Lucas, R.; Sarjeant,
A. A. N.; Karlin, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6998. (c) Mahapatra,
S.; Halfen, J. A.; Tolman, W. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11575.
(8) (a) Hudlicky, M. Oxidations in Organic Chemistry; ACS Monograph
186; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1990. (b) Alvarez, L.
X; Lorraine, C. M.; Sorokin, B. Appl. Catal., A 2007, 325, 303. (c) Hoang,
V. D. M.; Reddy, P. A. N; Kim, T.-J. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1026.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008
3707