not satisfying because of the relative unavailability of
Z-allylic alcohol sources and the competing rearrangement
boatlike transition state when a Z-allylic alcohol is applied.5
The ester-enolate Claisen rearrangement has been reported
for the synthesis of these molecules; however, limited chiral
starting materials and epimerization during the synthesis are
problems that remain to be solved.6 Most recently, our group
has achieved a synthesis of such amino acids via the
Eschenmoser-Claisen rearrangement with excellent diaste-
reoselectivity and good enantioselectivity.7 Here we report
on another novel, complementary synthesis via a thio-Claisen
rearrangement. This method is straightforward and highly
selective using a bulky C2 symmetric chiral auxiliary, and
the chiral auxiliary can be recycled after producing the final
amino acids.
the sulfur position. Thio-Claisen rearrangement occurred
when the reaction mixture was warmed up slowly to room
temperature or higher (when necessary) to afford thioamides
5 and 6 (Scheme 1).
Our first attempts at this reaction with 2.2 equiv of LDA
gave unsatisfactory results. The yields were extremely low
with large amounts of starting materials recovered. After
examining the structure more carefully, we realized that this
might be caused by a two-step deprotonation. The proton
on the R amino group is the most acidic one, which would
be removed first to give A. However, this makes the
deprotonation of the R proton much harder.10 The resulting
thioenolate dianion B is a new system that has never been
examined before to our knowledge. We postulated that B
might be capable of pulling the proton on the diisopropy-
lamine back, making the dianion formation a reversible
process (Scheme 2).11 If so, an excess amount of LDA
The C2 symmetric chiral auxiliary (2R,5R)-2,5-diphe-
nylpyrrolidine (1) was prepared in optically pure form8 and
coupled to NR-Cbz glycine to generate amide 2 using DIC/
HOAt as the coupling reagent. This coupling reaction gave
excellent yields despite the steric hindrance of the phenyl
rings (Scheme 1). A thionation reaction with Lawesson’s
Scheme 2. Equilibrium of Thio-Enolate Dianion Deprotonation
Scheme 1
.
Generation of Thio-Enolate Dianion and Asymmetric
Thio-Claisen Rearrangement
possibly can push the equilibrium toward the dianion, or
using a stronger base to make it an irreversible process might
solve the problem. To test this hypothesis, we increased the
amount of LDA to 3.2 equiv, and a significant improvement
in the reaction was observed: the yields were much better
and no starting material was observed after work up. A 2.2-
equiv portion of nBuLi also gave acceptable results, but extra
nBuLi is not desired because of the nucleophilicity of the
n-butyl anion. HMPA was also added before adding the
allylic bromide, and this was found to increase the product
yield and reduce the formation of C-alkylation side products.
The results of the rearrangement studied on six commercially
available allylic bromides are summarized in Table 1.
reagent converted the amide to the thioamide 3 in quantitative
yield.9 The thio-enolate was made by treatment of 3 with
freshly prepared LDA in THF at -78 °C, and then the allylic
bromide was added to the reaction to alkylate the enolate at
(4) (a) Kazmaier, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 998. (b)
Kazmaier, U. Synlett. 1995, 11, 1138. (c) Kazmaier, U.; Maier, S. Chem.
Commun. 1995, 19, 1991. (d) Mues, H.; Kazmaier, U. Synthesis 2001, 3,
487. (e) Qiu, W.; Gu, X.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Carducci, M. D.; Hruby,
V. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 145. (f) Kazmaier, U.; Mues, H.; Krebs,
A. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1850.
Despite higher temperatures being required in some cases,
the diastereoselectivities generally were excellent, and only
anti products were obtained as expected. In many cases, only
optically pure compounds were obtained. The absolute
configuration of the product 5d was determined by X-ray
(5) Kazmaier, U. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3694.
(6) (a) Sakaguchi, K.; Suzuki, H.; Ohfune, Y. Chirality 2001, 13, 357.
(b) Sakaguchi, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Kawamoto, T.; Ymada, T.; Shinada,
T.; Shimamoto, K.; Ohfune, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5869.
(7) (a) Qu, H.; Gu, X.; Min, B. J.; Liu, Z.; Hruby, V. J. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 4215. (b) Qu, H.; Gu, X.; Liu, Z.; Min, B. J.; Hruby, V. J. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 3997.
(10) Ishida, T.; Shinada, T.; Ohfune, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
311.
(8) Chong, J. M.; Clarke, I. S.; Koch, I.; Olbach, P. C.; Taylor, N. J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 409.
(11) (a) Laube, T.; Dunitz, T. D.; Seebach, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1985,
68, 1373. (b) Aebi, J. D.; Seebach, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1985, 68, 1507.
(9) Cava, M. P.; Levinson, M. I. Tetrahedron 1985, 22, 5061.
4106
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 18, 2008