Banaag and Tius
SCHEME 3
atom is an essential feature of the chiral auxiliary. There must
be an interaction between its equatorial nonbonding electron
pair and the pentadienyl carbocation before the cyclopentenone
C-C bond is fully formed. If there were no such interaction,
then rotation about the anomeric C-O bond would take place,
thereby limiting the transmission of stereochemical information
from the pyranose to the cyclopentenone. (2) The pyran ring
must invert before the cyclopentenone C-C bond is fully
formed. If it did not invert, then the equatorial C4 substituent
that is critical for obtaining cyclopentenone products in high
optical purity, would be too far to influence the torquoselectivity
of the ring closure. (3) The pyran ring inversion is induced by
the electrostatic attraction between the developing oxocarbenium
ion and the nonbonding electron pair on an axial oxygen atom,
according to Woerpel’s analysis. All this strongly suggests some
degree of simultaneity of bond forming and bond cleavage
during the conversion of 15c to R-8.
In order for this model to be valid, the 3,4,5-triaxial
conformation of the pyran ring in 15c must be energetically
accessible, and one must postulate a late transition state for the
cyclization in which significant positive charge develops at the
anomeric carbon atom. The energetic accessibility of the triaxial
conformer is not in doubt, and is supported by a wealth of
precedent. In 1994, we prepared 2-deoxy C-glycoside 22 and
determined that the ground-state conformation is as shown, with
the three groups at C3, C4, and C5 axial and the C1 methyl
group equatorial.20 The configurational assignment of 22 is
supported by the small vicinal coupling constants that were
measured for the equatorial methine protons in the 500 MHz
1H NMR spectrum. Presumably the conformational preference
of 22 is determined by the relief of steric compression between
the adjacent C3 and C4 silyloxy groups. Suzuki and co-workers
showed that 2,6-dideoxyglucopyranosyl acetate 23 prefers the
3,4,5-triaxial conformation.21 In Suzuki’s example relief of steric
compression evidently overrides any stabilization of the 3,4,5-
triequatorial conformer through the anomeric effect. The bal-
ance, however, is delicate, as Yamada’s results demonstrate.22
Whereas the equatorial C3 and C4 OTBS groups in 24 are
accommodated, the larger OTBDPS groups in 25 induce
conformational inversion of the pyran resulting in the 2,3,4,5-
tetraaxial conformer. Roush’s work also supports the notion that
chair-to-chair conformational inversion of the pyran ring is
facile.23 The reasons for the preference for diaxial conformers
in trans-1,2-dihydroxycyclohexane trialkylsilyl ethers have
recently been described by Marzabadi.24
Scheme 2). We postulated that this was accomplished through
electron pair donation from the pyran oxygen atom to the
developing pentadienyl carbocation, or alternatively through a
charge-dipole interaction (see 15c, Scheme 2). This has the effect
of bringing the chiral auxiliary into closer proximity to the
pentadienyl cation, but this alone is not enough to explain why
there should be a large difference in the levels of asymmetry
transfer between 10 and 12. The only way there can be a large
difference between 10 and 12 is if the substituents on the sugar
were to move close enough to the pentadienyl cation to influence
the sense of conrotation. One way for this to happen is to
postulate conformational inVersion of the pyranose ring in the
stereochemistry-determining operation.8 If this were to happen,
the C4 ether group that is equatorial in 12 would become axial
in 15c, thereby blocking one face of the pentadienyl cation and
biasing the conrotation to take place so as to move the phenyl
group in 15c away from the bulk of the C4 OTBS group. This
leads to R-8 after loss of the chiral auxiliary as six-membered-
ring oxocarbenium ion 16. The key element is the conforma-
tional inversion of the pyran ring under the conditions for the
cyclization. This is supported by the work of Bowen18 and more
recently by Woerpel and co-workers who found that the
conformational preferences of six-membered-ring oxocarbenium
ions follow a pattern and are highly dependent on the electronic
nature of the substituents.19 Woerpel’s results that are sum-
marized in Scheme 3 are illuminating. Exposure of acetate 17
and allyltrimethylsilane to BF3 ·Et2O in dichloromethane leads
to a diastereomeric mixture of cis and trans products 18 and
19, respectively. When the substituent X is methyl the cis/trans
ratio is 94/6, whereas when X ) OBn the ratio of products is
inverted, 1/99. The result for X ) CH2Bn (93/7) suggests that
it is the electronic characteristic not the size of the substituent
that influences the diastereomeric ratio. Woerpel postulates an
equilibrium between conformers 20 and 21 of the six-membered-
ring oxocarbenium ion. When X is an alkoxy group, electron
pair donation from the oxygen atom to the positively charged
carbon atom favors conformer 20, resulting in top face attack
by the electrophile, leading to trans product 19. When X is an
alkyl group, conformer 21, in which the substituent is equatorial,
is favored and electrophilic attack takes place from the bottom
face, leading to cis product 18. According to this paradigm, the
conformational inversion leading to transition state 15c is driven
by the stabilization that results from bringing the nonbonding
electron pairs on the C4 OTBS group closer to the anomeric
carbon atom.
If the model that has been proposed in Scheme 2 is valid,
then the following four predictions can be made. First, deleting
the equatorial OTBS group from C3 in 12 should not affect the
optical purity of the product. In 15c this group is far from the
developing cyclopentenone C-C bond, and should not be able
to directly influence the stereochemical outcome of the cycliza-
tion. Second, deleting the equatorial C4 OTBS group from 12
should have a measurable deleterious effect on the optical purity
of the product. Third, if the C4 substituent is constrained to
The elements of the mechanistic hypothesis that has been
summarized in Scheme 2 are listed below: (1) The pyran oxygen
(20) Tius, M. A.; Busch-Petersen, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5181–5184.
(21) Hosoya, T.; Ohashi, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 663–666.
(22) Yamada, H.; Tanigakiuchi, K.; Nagao, K.; Okajima, K.; Mukae, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5615–5618.
(23) Roush, W. R.; Sebesta, D. P.; Bennett, C. E. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
8825–8836.
(24) Marzabadi, C. H.; Anderson, J. E.; Gonzalez-Outeirino, J.; Gaffney,
P. R. J.; White, C. G. H.; Tocher, D. A.; Todaro, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 15163–15173.
(18) Woods, R. J.; Andrews, C. W.; Bowen, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 859–864.
(19) (a) Ayala, L.; Lucero, C. G.; Romero, J. A. C.; Tabacco, S. A.; Woerpel,
K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15521–15528. (b) Shenoy, S. R.; Woerpel,
K. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1157–1160. (c) Lucero, C. G.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 2641–2647.
8136 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 21, 2008