724
Chemistry Letters Vol.37, No.7 (2008)
Ruthenium-catalyzed 1,4-Addition of Organoboronic Acids to ꢀ,ꢁ-Unsaturated Ketones
Ryo Shintaniꢀ and Tamio Hayashiꢀ
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502
(Received April 25, 2008; CL-080431; E-mail: shintani@kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp, thayashi@kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
A ruthenium-catalyzed 1,4-addition of organoboronic acids
Table 1. Ruthenium-catalyzed 1,4-addition of phenylboronic
acid (2a) to 1-phenyl-2-buten-1-one (1a)
to ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated ketones has been developed. The use of
2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl as the ligand in combination
with [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 complex catalyzes these reactions
to selectively give 1,4-adducts in good yield by effectively
suppressing Heck-type and reduced products.
O
Catalyst
(5 mol % Ru)
Me
Ph
Ph
O
Ph
O
O
1a
+
KOH (1.0 equiv)
Dioxane/H2O
(100/1)
Me
Ph Me
Ph Me
Ph
PhB(OH)2
2a (4.0 equiv)
3aa
4
5
90 °C, 24 h
Yield/%a
3aa
1,4-Addition of readily available and easy-to-handle carbon
nucleophlies such as organoboronic acids to electron-deficient
alkenes is a useful method for efficient construction of carbon–
carbon bonds. Traditionally, copper complexes have been typi-
cally employed as catalysts for 1,4-addition reactions,1 particu-
larly of alkyl nucleophiles such as alkylmagnesium halides,2
dialkylzincs,3 and trialkylaluminums.4 Within the context of
the addition of organoboronic acids, rhodium complexes have
been most widely used as effective catalysts since the first report
by Miyaura et al. in 1997,5 and its asymmetric variants have
also been successfully developed in the past decade.6 In addition
to rhodium complexes, palladium7 and nickel8 complexes have
also exhibited catalytic activity in the 1,4-addition reactions of
organoboronic acids and/or their derivatives. In contrast, the
use of other transition metals for these useful carbon–carbon
bond-forming reactions has been scarcely explored. In this
context, herein we describe the development of a ruthenium-cat-
alyzed 1,4-addition of organoboronic acids to ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated
ketones (eq 1).9
Entry
Catalyst
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RuCl2(PPh3)3
[RuCpꢀCl]4
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/dppf
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/PPh3
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/PCy3
4
14
2
5
6
5
38 16 20
17
5
4
22 17 18
34 12 11
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/P(t-Bu)2(2-PhC6H4) 70
6
7
aDetermined by H NMR against internal standard (MeNO2).
1
[Ru]
X
PhB(OH)2
O
[Ru]
H
[Ru] Ph
H2O
[Ru]
Ph
1a
3aa
−
X
Me
Ph
A
β
-H elimination
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2
(5 mol % Ru)
P(t-Bu)2(2-PhC6H4) (5 mol %)
4
+
O
R
O
O
[Ru]
+ RB(OH)2
(4.0 equiv)
(1)
KOH (1.0 equiv)
Dioxane/H2O (100/1)
90 °C, 24 h
R1
R2
[Ru]
H
H2O
R1
R2
Ph
1a
5
up to 83% yield
−
[Ru]
X
H
Me
B
H
We started the study by employing 1-phenyl-2-buten-1-one
(1a) as a model substrate and conducted reactions with
phenylboronic acid (2a) in the presence of 5 mol % of several
readily available ruthenium(II) complexes in aqueous dioxane
at 90 ꢁC. Among those examined (Table 1, Entries 1–3),
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 showed the highest catalytic activity, but
it gave a mixture of 1,4-adduct 3aa (38%), Heck-type product
4 (16%), and reduced product 5 (20%) rather nonselectively.
The formation of these products can be rationalized by the path-
ways proposed in Scheme 1. Thus, phenylruthenium species,
generated by transmetalation of phenyl group from boron to
ruthenium,9 adds to enone 1a in a 1,4-fashion to give intermedi-
ate A. Protonolysis of A gives 1,4-adduct 3aa, whereas ꢁ-hy-
dride elimination of A produces Heck-type product 4 along with
a ruthenium hydride. Hydroruthenation of this species to another
molecule of 1a, followed by protonolysis, leads to reduced
product 5. To improve the selectivity toward the formation of
1,4-adduct 3aa by suppressing the undesired ꢁ-hydride elimina-
tion of A, we decided to conduct the reaction in the presence of
added phosphine ligands. The use of bisphosphine ligands such
Scheme 1. Proposed reaction pathways for the formation of
3aa, 4, and 5.
as dppf did improve the selectivity toward 3aa over 4/5 to some
extent, but the overall reactivity became significantly lower
(Entry 4). Common tertiary monophosphines such as triphenyl-
phosphine and tricyclohexylphosphine did not show much
influence on reactivity or selectivity (Entries 5 and 6). In
contrast, the use of 2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl10 led to
the formation of 3aa in 70% yield by effectively minimizing
the formation of 4 and 5 (Entry 7).
Under the conditions using [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/2-(di-tert-
butylphosphino)biphenyl as the catalyst, several ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturat-
ed acyclic ketones can be used for 1,4-addition of phenylboronic
acid to give the corresponding products in 60–80% yield
(Table 2, Entries 1–4). For cyclic ketones such as 2-cyclopent-
en-1-one, the reaction proceeded better without using 2-
(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl (Entry 5). With regard to the
nucleophilic component, several aryl- as well as alkenylboronic
Copyright Ó 2008 The Chemical Society of Japan