Gabriele et al.
TABLE 5. 5. Synthesis of 2-Alkoxymethylbenzofurans 5a-g and
6a-g by Acid-Catalyzed Allylic Nucleophilic Substitution of
2-Methylene-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols 2a-g with Primary
Alcoholsa
respectively) could be used to give the corresponding 2-alkoxym-
ethylbenzofurans 5 and 6 in good to excellent yields (69-95%),
as exemplified by the results reported in Table 5.4 DME was
the solvent of choice for these reactions in the presence of a
5-fold excess of ROH with respect to starting 2-methylene-2,3-
dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols 2.
Conclusions
entry
2
R1
2a Me
2b
2e Me Cl
R2
R3
R
product yield of productb (%)
In conclusion, we have shown that a simple catalytic system,
consisting of PdX2 in conjunction with 2 equiv of KX (X )
Cl, I) and in the presence of a base such as morpholine, is an
excellent catalyst for the conversion of 2-(1-hydroxyprop-2-
ynyl)phenols 1 into 2-methylene-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols
2 in high to excellent yields (80-98%).5 With PdI2 + 2KI as
the catalyst, the use of a stoichiometric rather than catalytic
amount of base led to better results in terms of reaction rate
and product yield. On the other hand, the use of PdCl2 + 2KCl
led to better results in the presence of a catalytic rather than a
stoichiometric amount of base. The 2-methylene-2,3-dihy-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Bu
Bu
Bu
Bu
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
5a
5b
5e
5f
95
80
83
76
81
71
88
69
H
2f
2a Me
2b
2e Me Cl
2f OMe
H
OMe
H
6a
6b
6e
6f
H
H
H
a All reactions were carried out in the presence of a 5-fold excess of
ROH with respect to 2, in a 9:1 mixture of DME-H2SO4 (0.02 M in
DME) (substrate concentration ) 0.22 mmol of 2/mL of solvent, 0.6
mmol scale based on 2) at room temperature for 15 h. Substrate
conversion was quantitative in all cases. b Based on starting 2.
(3) We have recently shown that PdI2 in conjunction with an excess of KI is
an excellent catalyst for the heterocyclization of several acetylenic substrates
bearing a suitably placed nucleophilic group. See ref 2r, ii, yy and: (a) Gabriele,
B.; Mancuso, R.; Salerno, G.; Lupinacci, E.; Ruffolo, G.; Costa, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 4971–4977. (b) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; Salerno, G.; Plastina,
P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 756–759. (c) Plastina, P.; Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.
Synthesis 2007, 3083–3087. (d) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; Salerno, G.; Ruffolo,
G.; Plastina, P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6873–6877. (e) Gabriele, B.; Plastina,
P.; Salerno, G.; Mancuso, R.; Costa, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3319–3322. (f)
Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G. PdI2. In e-EROS, Electronic Encyclopedia of Reagents
for Organic Synthesis; Crich, D., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2006. (g)
Gabriele, B.; Plastina, P.; Salerno, G.; Mancuso, R. Synthesis 2006, 4247–4251.
(h) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A.; Veltri, L. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348,
2212–2222. (i) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Veltri, L.; Mancuso, R.; Li, Z.; Crispini,
A.; Bellusci, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7895–7898. (j) Bacchi, A.; Costa, M.;
Della Ca`, N.; Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Cassoni, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
4971–4979. (k) Gabriele, B.; Plastina, P.; Salerno, G.; Costa, M. Synlett 2005,
935–938. (l) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Costa, M. Synlett 2004, 2468–2483. (m)
Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8,
919–946. (n) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Plastina, P. Lett. Org. Chem. 2004, 1,
134–136. (o) Costa, M.; Della Ca`, N.; Gabriele, B.; Massera, C.; Salerno, G.;
Soliani, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2469–2477. (p) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.;
Plastina, P.; Costa, M.; Crispini, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 351–358. (q)
Bacchi, A.; Costa, M.; Della Ca`, N.; Fabbricatore, M.; Fazio, A.; Gabriele, B.;
Nasi, C.; Salerno, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 57, 4–585. (r) Gabriele, B.;
Salerno, G.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 687, 219–
228. (s) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7853–
7861. (t) Chiusoli, G. P.; Costa, M.; Cucchia, L.; Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Veltri,
L. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 204, 133–142. (u) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.;
Fazio, A.; Pittelli, R. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6251–6259. (v) Bacchi, A.; Costa,
M.; Gabriele, B.; Pelizzi, G.; Salerno, G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4450–4457.
(w) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A.; Campana, F. B. Chem. Commun. 2002,
1408–1409. (x) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Veltri, L.; Costa, M.; Massera, C.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 460, 7–4613. (y) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A.;
Bossio, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1339–1341. (z) Gabriele, B.; Salerno,
G.; Fazio, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 351–352. (aa) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; De
Pascali, F.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 593, 409–
415. (bb) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; De Pascali, F.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7693–7699. (cc) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Lauria, E. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7687–7692. (dd) Chiusoli, G. P.; Costa, M.; Gabriele, B.;
Salerno, G. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 143, 297–310. (ee) Bacchi, A.;
Chiusoli, G. P.; Costa, M.; Sani, C.; Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1998, 562, 35–43. (ff) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; De Pascali, F.; Tomasi
Sciano`, G.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli, G. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6877–6880.
(gg) Bacchi, A.; Chiusoli, G. P.; Gabriele, B.; Righi, C.; Salerno, G. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1209–1210. (hh) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G. Chem. Commun. 1997,
1083–1084. (ii) Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; De Pascali, F.; Costa, M.; Chiusoli,
G. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 147–154. (jj) Bonardi, A.; Costa,
M.; Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Chiusoli, G. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7495–
7498. (kk) Gabriele, B.; Costa, M.; Salerno, G.; Chiusoli, G. P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1994, 1429–1430.
drobenzofuran-3-ols 2 thus obtained could be efficiently con-
verted into functionalized benzofurans by acid-promoted allylic
isomerization (with formation of 2-hydroxymethylbenzofurans
3 in 65-90% yields) or allylic nucleophilic substitution with
primary alcohols as nucleophiles (with formation of 2-alkoxym-
ethylbenzofurans 4-6 in 65-98% yields). The methodology
here reported allows an easy entry to both 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran
and benzofuran derivatives starting from readily available
starting materials.
Experimental Section
Starting 2-(1-hydroxyprop-2-ynyl)phenols 1 were prepared as we
already described.2ii,3b,6 Typical procedures for the synthesis of
2-methylene-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols 2, 2-hydroxymethylben-
zofurans 3, and 2-alkoxymethylbenzofurans 4-6 are given below.
Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of 2-Methylene-2,3-
dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols 2 in the Presence of PdI2+2KI. We
report here as a typical procedure the preparation of 3-methyl-2-
methylene-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-3-ol 2a (Table 1, entry 4). Details
for the preparation of all the other 2-methylene-2,3-dihydrobenzo-
furan-3-ols 2b-g can be found in the Supporting Information. In
a typical experiment, PdI2 (10.5 mg, 2.92 × 10-2 mmol), KI (9.7
mg, 5.84 × 10-2 mmol), and morpholine (253.0 mg, 2.90 mmol)
were added under nitrogen to a solution of 1a (470.0 mg, 2.90
mmol) in anhydrous MeOH (13.2 mL) in a Schlenk flask. The
resulting mixture was stirred under nitrogen at 40 °C for 2 h. Solvent
was evaporated and the crude product purified by column chro-
matography on silica gel using 80:20 hexane-AcOEt as eluent to
(5) To our knowledge, this is the first method reported in the literature of
catalytic conversion of 2-(1-hydroxyprop-2-ynyl)phenols into 2-methylene-2,3-
dihydrobenzofuran-3-ols. The cyclization of 4-hydroxy-4-(2-hydroxyphenyl)pent-
2-ynoic acid ethyl ester (obtained by in situ HgCl2-promoted deprotection of
the corresponding methylthiomethyl ether) by classical intramolecular conjugate
addition to give a mixture of (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-3H-benzofuran-2-ylidene)
acetic acid ethyl ester (15%) and hydroxy-(3-methylbenzofuran-2-yl)acetic acid
ethyl ester (68%) was reported some years ago. Pflieger, D.; Muckensturm, B.
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2031–2040.
(6) We report here the correct GC-MS data for 2-(1-hydroxyprop-2-
ynyl)phenol 1b and 2-(1-hydroxyprop-2-ynyl)-4-methoxyphenol 1f, which were
inadvertently reported incorrect in refs 2ii and 3b: MS (EI, 70 eV) for 1b, m/z
) 148 (4) [M+], 130 (25), 121 (3), 103 (11), 102 (100), 91 (8), 77 (19), 76 (26),
75 (12), 74 (10), 65 (14), 63 (14), 53 (11), 51 (16), 50 (11); for 1f, m/z ) 178
(13) [M+], 161 (13), 160 (87), 145 (7), 132 (21), 118 (16), 117 (41), 103 (30),
102 (43), 89 (100), 77 (22), 63 (59), 62 (23), 53 (33), 51 (22).
(4) The methodology could not be applied to alcohols of low nucleophilicity,
such as isopropyl alcohol (R ) i-Pr) or tert-butylalcohol (R ) t-Bu), or to phenols
(R ) Ar); in these cases, the GLC, GLC-MS, and TLC analyses of the reaction
crudes showed that substrates 2 preferentially underwent decomposition, with
formation of small amounts of the desired products, which, however, owing to
the complexity of the mixture, could not be isolated at the pure state.
7340 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 18, 2008